How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge
Open accessAbstract
The Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) is an open-access resource providing up-to-date taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic data for global mammal species. Since its launch in 2018, the MDD has transformed the traditionally static process of updating mammalian taxonomy into regular online releases reflecting the latest published research. To build on this foundation, we here present version 2.0 of the MDD (MDD2), which catalogs 6,759 living and recently extinct mammal species, representing net increases of 4.1% and 24.8% over MDD version 1.0 and Mammal Species of the World, 3rd edition (MSW3), respectively. Additionally, we identify a net increase of 68.8% (+2,754; 3,149 splits + de novo, 395 lumps) species since 1980 at a rate of ∼65 species/yr based on past totals from 14 mammalian compendia, leading to projections of ∼7,079 species by 2030 and ∼8,376 by 2050 if these trends continue. Key updates in MDD2 include: (i) codings of US state, country, continent, and biogeographic realm geographic categories for each species; (ii) a comprehensive nomenclatural dataset for 50,230 valid and synonymous species-rank names, curated with type locality and specimen information for the first time; and (iii) integration between the MDD and the databases Hesperomys and Batnames for greater data accuracy and completeness. These updates bridge critical gaps in the taxonomic and nomenclatural information needed for ongoing revisions and assessments of mammalian species diversity. Using these data, we evaluate temporal and geographic trends over the past 267 yr, identifying 4 major time periods of change in mammalian taxonomy and nomenclature: (i) the initial monographic description of traditionally charismatic species (1758 to 1880); (ii) the peak of descriptive taxonomy, describing subspecies, and publishing in journals (1881 to 1939); (iii) the shift toward revisionary taxonomy and recognizing polytypic species (1940 to 1999); and (iv) the current technology-driven period of integrative revisionary taxonomy (2000 to present). Geographically, new species recognition since MSW3 has been concentrated in equatorial, mountainous, and island regions—highlighting areas of high mammal endemism (e.g., Madagascar, Philippines, Andes, East Africa, Himalayas, Atlantic Forest). However, gaps in 21st-century taxonomic activity are identified in West and Central Africa, India, and some parts of Indonesia. Additionally, lagging conservation assessments are alarming, with 25% of the MDD2-recognized mammal species allocated to the “understudied” conservation threat categories of Data Deficient (11%) or Not Evaluated (14%), underscoring the need for greater taxonomic integration with conservation organizations. Governance advancements in MDD2 include the establishment of external taxonomic subcommittees to guide data collection and curation, a rewritten website that improves access and scalability, a cross-platform mobile application that provides offline access, and new partnerships to continue linking MDD data to global biodiversity infrastructure. By providing up-to-date mammalian taxonomic and nomenclatural data—including links to the text of original name descriptions, type localities, and type specimen collections—the MDD provides an integrative resource for mammalogists and conservationists to more easily track the status of their study organisms.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
MDD2 catalogs 6,759 living and recently extinct mammal species, a net increase of 4.1% over MDD1 and 24.8% over MSW3, alongside 50,230 species-rank names and new geographic/nomenclatural metadata. It documents 267 years of taxonomic change and projects ~7,079 mammal species by 2030 and ~8,376 by 2050 if recent trends continue.
Key findings
- MDD2 recognizes 6,759 valid mammal species (6,629 wild extant; 113 recently extinct; 17 domestic), which is 267 more (+4.1%) than MDD1 and 1,343 more (+24.8%) than MSW3; the 2024-1 IUCN Red List lists 5,983 species, 776 fewer (−11.5%) than MDD2.
- Since 1980, MDD2 identifies a net increase of 2,754 species (+68.8%; 3,149 splits + de novo, 395 lumps) at ~65 species/yr; linear regression across 14 compendia gave y = 64.86x − 124587.19, R² = 0.98, projecting ~7,079 species by 2030, ~7,727 by 2040, ~8,376 by 2050, and ~11,619 by 2100.
- MDD2 includes 50,230 species-rank names: 28,382 available names, 2,127 unavailable names, 3,445 spelling variants, 16,182 name combinations, and 435 other subsequent uses; type localities are recorded for 99.6% of originally available names and all valid species, and type specimen locations for 73.3% of originally available names (87.9% of valid species).
- Of 6,742 wild mammal species, 25.5% (1,716) are “understudied” on the IUCN Red List—11.5% (773) Data Deficient and 14.0% (943) Not Evaluated—while 19.2% (1,295) are threatened (VU, EN, CR, EW); new species recognition since MSW3 is concentrated in equatorial, mountainous, and island regions, with gaps in West and Central Africa, India, and parts of Indonesia.
Methods
- MDD2 used a taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic cutoff of 15 August 2024; it compared MDD2 taxonomy to 14 major compendia since 1980 and all 18 MDD versions, then used linear regression of species totals to project future recognized richness.
- Curation tracked peer-reviewed mammal taxonomy, mostly following the most recent published evidence, with documented subjective decisions; nomenclatural data were integrated with Hesperomys and Batnames, and geographic distributions were coded for countries/offshore territories, country subregions (US states only), continents, and 8 terrestrial biogeographic realms.
- Analyses summarized name descriptions since 1758, type localities, species richness, endemism, conservation status, and website/database usage; R code and supplementary data are available via GitHub and Zenodo.
Limitations
- The paper states that future richness projections are based on compendia totals rather than year-by-year split, lump, and de novo data; it notes the 2100 estimate “seems more far-fetched” because trends likely level off, and that MDD has refrained from tracking subspecies due to inconsistent use.
- The paper states that type specimen coverage is nearly complete for North America but incomplete for many names likely housed in European collections, and that some taxonomic decisions are subjective or can be “ricochetal” amid conflicting literature.
- Evident from the text: country subregions are implemented only for the United States; type-locality coordinates are available for just 9.8% of available names and 27.4% of valid species; and MDD recognizes 17 domestic forms as species despite acknowledging this contradicts much evolutionary and taxonomic research.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
25 of 130 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The IUCN Red List subsequently provided the sole source of digital range maps for mammals until Marsh et al. (2022) digitized range maps aligned to 3 alternative taxonomies: HMW (6,253 species); CMW (6,431 species); and MDD version 1.2 (6,362 species).
“The IUCN Red List subsequently provided the sole source of digital range maps for mammals until Marsh et al. (2022) digitized range maps aligned to 3 alternative taxonomies: HMW (6,253 species); CMW (6,431 species); and MDD version 1.2 (6,362 species; note that each taxonomy also contains unmapped species that are extinct or data deficient—see tables later in the text Tables 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Marsh et al. 2022 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationown data
Comparison among these datasets documents how the geographic concepts of species-rank mammal taxa have changed over relatively short time periods, mostly from taxonomic changes, in contrast to actual range shifts over longer periods.
“Comparison among these datasets documents how the geographic concepts of species-rank mammal taxa have changed over relatively short time periods, mostly from taxonomic changes, in contrast to actual range shifts over longer periods (but see Pacifici et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pacifici et al. 2020 source
- Interpretationcitation
Integration of nomenclatural data from Hesperomys has greatly strengthened the MDD.
“In particular, integration of nomenclatural data from Hesperomys (Zijlstra 2024)—an online database cataloging the nomenclature of living and extinct animals, with a focus on mammals—has greatly strengthened the MDD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zijlstra 2024 source
- Findingcitation
MDD2 includes a newly curated list of species-rank synonyms for every mammal species in the MDD, totaling 50,230 synonyms.
“MDD2 includes a newly curated list of species-rank synonyms—created in collaboration with Hesperomys (Zijlstra 2024)—for every mammal species in the MDD, totaling 50,230 synonyms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zijlstra 2024 source
The dataset Description (no page number) identifies Hesperomys as a mammal-focused taxonomy and nomenclature database with data on names, supporting its identification in the citation. It does not state that Hesperomys collaborated on MDD2’s newly curated synonym list or verify the figure of 50,230 synonyms. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Some mammal species appear capable of retaining phenotypic and ecological distinctiveness from related species even in the face of substantial introgressive hybridization (e.g., mustelids, felids, bats).
“Some mammal species appear capable of retaining phenotypic and ecological distinctiveness from related species even in the face of substantial introgressive hybridization (e.g., mustelids, felids, bats; Li et al. 2019; Colella et al. 2021; Foley et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Li et al. 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Colella et al. 2021 source
- cites Foley et al. 2024 source
The Results section (‘A link between introgression and swarming behavior?’; page unavailable) reports exceptionally pervasive introgression among distinct Myotis bat species, including species from divergent clades. It does not establish that those species retain phenotypic and ecological distinctiveness despite that introgression. The other mammal examples have separate citations and are not attributed to Foley et al. alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Comparative genomic evidence in cats and house mice suggests that some regions on the X chromosome are 'protected' from recombination, causing hybrid male offspring to be sterile if altered, thereby reinforcing the distinction among lineages.
“For example, comparative genomic evidence in cats (Bredemeyer et al. 2021) and house mice (Forejt et al. 2021) suggests that some regions on the X chromosome are “protected” from recombination, causing hybrid male offspring to be sterile if altered, thereby reinforcing the distinction among lineages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Most specimens from tropical regions are housed in European and North American institutions.
“Most specimens from tropical regions are housed in European and North American institutions (see figure 2 in Heberling et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Heberling et al. 2021 source
The Results section and Fig. 2 caption (page unavailable) compare where biodiversity is studied with where researchers are affiliated; they do not show where specimens are housed. The Discussion says specimens have historically been held in museums, but gives no geographic breakdown of tropical specimens. Searches for tropical specimen holdings and institutional locations found no passage establishing the claimed majority. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
This shortfall is most evident in parts of Africa, Asia, and South America, such as West and Central Africa, the Amazon Basin, Central Asia, most of India, and some Indonesian islands.
“This is most evident in parts of Africa, Asia, and South America, such as West and Central Africa, the Amazon Basin, Central Asia, most of India, and some Indonesian islands (e.g., Java, Sumatra, Borneo), supporting calls for regional taxonomic work (e.g., Klopper et al. 2002; Chatterjee et al. 2020; Monadjem et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Klopper et al. 2002 source
- cites Chatterjee et al. 2020 source
- cites Monadjem et al. 2024 source
The Limitations section identifies under-sampled bat regions in Central and parts of West Africa, supporting the African portion of the sentence. The paper does not address the claimed shortfalls in the Amazon Basin, Central Asia, India, or Indonesian islands; its stated need is for more sampling across Africa. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Parsons et al. (2022) used mitochondrial genetic data from a subset of 4,310 mammal species to find that body mass and range size rank as the top predictors of unrecognized cryptic species.
“Parsons et al. (2022) used mitochondrial genetic data from a subset of 4,310 mammal species to find which covariates best predict unrecognized cryptic species, with body mass and range size ranking as the top predictors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Parsons et al. 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Rodents, bats, and eulipotyphlans are predicted to be the largest sources of unrecognized mammal species despite high rates of new species recognition in these clades.
“Rodents, bats, and eulipotyphlans are predicted to be the largest sources of unrecognized mammal species despite the high rate of new species recognition in these clades.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Parsons et al. 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Less speciose mammal taxa like Hyracoidea, Scandentia, Pilosa, Pholidota, Lagomorpha, and Perissodactyla that have received comparatively less taxonomic attention in the 21st century are also likely to contain cryptic species.
“However, less speciose mammal taxa like Hyracoidea, Scandentia, Pilosa, Pholidota, Lagomorpha, and Perissodactyla that have received comparatively less taxonomic attention in the 21st century are also likely to contain cryptic species (Parsons et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Parsons et al. 2022 source
The Results (Species Delimitation; page unavailable) support the general point that mammal species may contain hidden diversity, but identify Chiroptera, Rodentia, and Eulipotyphla as the orders expected to contain the majority. The copy does not make that prediction for the six named orders. The Discussion (Predictors of Hidden Species in Mammals; page unavailable) also associates hidden species with taxa more represented in recent taxonomic publications, rather than comparatively less attention. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
This imbalance between where mammals live and where their specimens are preserved helps to perpetuate geographic disparities in biodiversity knowledge and conservation outcomes.
“This imbalance between where mammals live and where their specimens are preserved helps to perpetuate geographic disparities in biodiversity knowledge and conservation outcomes (see Pritchard et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pritchard et al. 2022 source
In “The Need for Critical Perspectives on Conservation Data,” the paper says biodiversity data are biased toward particular locations and that these biases affect the distribution of conservation resources. The “Risks of Global Prioritization Analyses” section also describes how data omissions can make places or species less visible. It does not address the specific imbalance between where mammals live and where their specimens are preserved. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
New species recognition since MSW3 has been concentrated in equatorial, mountainous, and island regions.
“Geographically, new species recognition since MSW3 has been concentrated in equatorial, mountainous, and island regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There has been a net increase of 68.8% (+2,754; 3,149 splits + de novo, 395 lumps) in mammal species since 1980.
“we identify a net increase of 68.8% (+2,754; 3,149 splits + de novo, 395 lumps) species since 1980”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The species totals from the 14 mammalian compendia are comparable and accurate enough to estimate a global rate of species recognition.
- Findingown data
The rate of mammal species increase since 1980 is approximately 65 species per year, based on past totals from 14 mammalian compendia.
“at a rate of ∼65 species/yr based on past totals from 14 mammalian compendia”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The species totals from the 14 mammalian compendia are comparable and accurate enough to estimate a global rate of species recognition.
- Findingown data
Gaps in 21st-century taxonomic activity are identified in West and Central Africa, India, and some parts of Indonesia.
“However, gaps in 21st-century taxonomic activity are identified in West and Central Africa, India, and some parts of Indonesia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The MDD taxonomy now tracks categorical changes in the country, continent, and biogeographic realm distributions of accepted species as a core aspect of taxonomic curation.
“Because geographic knowledge is expected to keep evolving, the MDD taxonomy now tracks categorical changes in the country, continent, and biogeographic realm distributions of accepted species as a core aspect of taxonomic curation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
MDD2 integrates with the databases Hesperomys and Batnames for greater data accuracy and completeness.
“(iii) integration between the MDD and the databases Hesperomys and Batnames for greater data accuracy and completeness”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 includes a comprehensive nomenclatural dataset for 50,230 valid and synonymous species-rank names, curated with type locality and specimen information for the first time.
“(ii) a comprehensive nomenclatural dataset for 50,230 valid and synonymous species-rank names, curated with type locality and specimen information for the first time”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 represents a net increase of 24.8% over Mammal Species of the World, 3rd edition (MSW3).
“representing net increases of 4.1% and 24.8% over MDD version 1.0 and Mammal Species of the World, 3rd edition (MSW3), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 includes codings of US state, country, continent, and biogeographic realm geographic categories for each species.
“Key updates in MDD2 include: (i) codings of US state, country, continent, and biogeographic realm geographic categories for each species”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 represents a net increase of 4.1% over MDD version 1.0.
“representing net increases of 4.1% and 24.8% over MDD version 1.0 and Mammal Species of the World, 3rd edition (MSW3), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
25% of MDD2-recognized mammal species are allocated to the "understudied" conservation threat categories of Data Deficient (11%) or Not Evaluated (14%).
“with 25% of the MDD2-recognized mammal species allocated to the “understudied” conservation threat categories of Data Deficient (11%) or Not Evaluated (14%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Version 2.0 of the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD2) catalogs 6,759 living and recently extinct mammal species.
“we here present version 2.0 of the MDD (MDD2), which catalogs 6,759 living and recently extinct mammal species”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 catalogs nomenclatural data for 50,230 valid and synonymous species-rank scientific names.
“along with nomenclatural data for 50,230 valid and synonymous species-rank scientific names”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Starting in January 2024 with MDD v1.12 and Batnames v1.5, all MDD species and higher-rank taxa of bats are matching between these databases.
“Coordination with Batnames (Simmons and Cirranello 2024) has also been critical to standardize the taxonomic arrangement of the Order Chiroptera so that, starting in January 2024 with MDD v1.12 and Batnames v1.5, all MDD species and higher-rank taxa of bats are matching between these databases”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Simmons and Cirranello 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Linear regression of estimates across 14 compendia recovered a significant increase in mammal species recognition from 1980 to 2024 (y = 64.86x − 124587.19; R2 = 0.98).
“Linear regression of estimates across 14 compendia recovered a significant increase in mammal species recognition from 1980 to 2024 (y = 64.86x − 124587.19; R2 = 0.98; Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The total species counts from the compared compendia (other than IUCN) are representative of the number of recognized mammal species at their time.
- Findingown data
The MDD-Hesperomys search efforts have located names not included in recent taxonomic compendia (e.g., MSW3), which are added to the MDD-Hesperomys synonym dataset.
“These efforts have also located names that were not included in recent taxonomic compendia (e.g., MSW3), which are added to the MDD-Hesperomys synonym dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over a broader time period, MDD2 recognizes 2,754 more species (+68.8% over 44 yr; 3,149 splits + de novo, 395 lumps) than the 4,005 species recognized in 1980 by C&H1.
“MDD2 recognizes 2,754 more species (+68.8% over 44 yr; 3,149 splits + de novo, 395 lumps) than the 4,005 species recognized in 1980 by C&H1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 includes 267 more species (+4.1% over 7 yrs) than the 6,495 species recognized in MDD1.
“MDD2 includes 267 more species (+4.1% over 7 yrs) than the 6,495 species recognized in MDD1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
MDD v1.2 is the only version that cataloged more species lumps than additions.
“which makes MDD v1.2 the only version that cataloged more species lumps than additions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
46 mammalian names were described by Raymond Hoser between 2018 and the MDD2 cutoff date.
“but 46 mammalian names were described between 2018 and the MDD2 cutoff date.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over August 2017 to August 2024, the MDD cataloged a total of 305 de novo species, 392 split species, and 435 lumped species.
“Over this period, the MDD cataloged a total of 305 de novo species, 392 split species, and 435 lumped species”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ∼25% increase over 20 yrs in recognized mammal species is comparable to the 31.1% increase (+1,246 species) over a 22-yr period from the 1982 release of MSW1 to the 2004 taxonomic cutoff of MSW3.
“The ∼25% increase over 20 yrs in recognized mammal species is comparable to the 31.1% increase (+1,246 species) over a 22-yr period from the 1982 release of MSW1 to the 2004 taxonomic cutoff of MSW3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 includes 1,343 more species (+24.8% over 20 yrs) than the 5,416 in MSW3.
“1,343 more (+24.8% over 20 yrs) than the 5,416 in MSW3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 catalogs the taxonomy and distribution of 6,759 valid mammal species.
“MDD2 catalogs the taxonomy and distribution of 6,759 valid mammal species (6,629 wild extant; 113 extinct; 17 domestic)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The IUCN includes 5 families that MDD2 does not (Capromyidae, Eschrichtiidae, Megalonychidae, Myocastoridae, Neobalaenidae).
“while the IUCN includes 5 families that MDD2 does not (Capromyidae, Eschrichtiidae, Megalonychidae, Myocastoridae, Neobalaenidae”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There are considerably fewer species-rank names described from 1758-1880 compared to the 19th and 20th centuries.
“There are considerably fewer species-rank names described from this period compared to the 19th and 20th centuries, although there are 2 notable single-year spikes in species descriptions associated with single”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Fully 25.5% (1,716 species) of MDD2-accepted mammal species are either listed as DD or are NE relative to the IUCN Red List.
“Thus, fully 25.5% (1,716 species) of MDD2-accepted mammal species are either listed as DD or are NE relative to the IUCN Red List”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Since MSW3, there has been a net increase of 1,353 recognized mammal species (+24.8%).
“leading to a net increase of 1,353 species (+24.8%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Most publications from 1758-1880 were monographs adding to or revising previously published global animal or mammal taxonomies rather than journal articles describing individual species or clades.
“Most of these publications were monographs adding to or revising previously published global animal or mammal taxonomies rather than journal articles describing individual species or clades.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 10 countries with the most available name type localities are the United States (2,552 names), Indonesia (1,732), Mexico (1,301), Brazil (1,088), China (1,084), Russia (975), South Africa (916), Australia (895), India (689), and Kenya (523).
“The 10 countries with the most available name type localities are the United States (2,552 names), Indonesia (1,732), Mexico (1,301), Brazil (1,088), China (1,084), Russia (975), South Africa (916), Australia (895), India (689), and Kenya (523”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Type localities of new species-rank names described since 2000 show a strong latitudinal gradient, with a larger proportion from tropical than temperate regions.
“The type localities of new species-rank names described since 2000 have a global distribution, but there is a strong latitudinal gradient, with a larger proportion of names described from tropical than temperate regions (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 includes 8 families that the IUCN does not (†Archaeolemuridae, Cetotheriidae, Choloepodidae, Heterocephalidae, †Megaladapidae, Potamogalidae, Zapodidae, and Zenkerellidae).
“MDD2 includes 8 families that the IUCN does not (†Archaeolemuridae, Cetotheriidae, Choloepodidae, Heterocephalidae, †Megaladapidae, Potamogalidae, Zapodidae, and Zenkerellidae)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
These three orders collectively make up 71.5% of total mammal species richness in MDD2.
“collectively making up 71.5% of total mammal species richness in MDD2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
During 1758-1880, many species were renamed or described multiple times across publications, resulting in many synonymous names for single species.
“During this period, many species were renamed or described multiple times across publications, resulting in many synonymous names for single species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The history of mammalian taxonomic study shows an arc of changing biodiversity knowledge from 1758 to 2024.
“The history of mammalian taxonomic study shows an arc of changing biodiversity knowledge from 1758 to 2024 (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Species-rank available names were described from 1758 to 2023 at an average rate of 106.2 names per year.
“Species-rank available names were described from 1758 to 2023 at an average rate of 106.2 names per year”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 contains a curated dataset of 50,230 species-rank names applicable to all currently recognized mammal species.
“MDD2 contains a curated dataset of 50,230 species-rank names that are applicable to all currently recognized mammal species”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There are 23,973 more species-rank names listed in MDD2/Hesperomys compared to MSW3, which listed 26,257 such names.
“There are 23,973 more species-rank names listed in MDD2/Hesperomys compared to MSW3, which listed 26,257 such names.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of all available mammal names are considered synonyms of valid species on MDD2 (21,254 names; 74.9% of available names).
“The majority of all available mammal names are considered synonyms of valid species on MDD2 (i.e., 21,254 names; 74.9% of available names).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Across terrestrial biogeographic realms, the Neotropical realm harbors the greatest number of currently recognized mammal species, followed by the Afrotropical, Palearctic, Indomalayan, Australasian, Nearctic, and Oceanian realms.
“the Neotropical realm harbors the greatest number of currently recognized mammal species, followed by the Afrotropical, Palearctic, Indomalayan, Australasian, Nearctic, and Oceanian realms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Of the 6,742 wild mammal species recognized in MDD2 (excluding 17 domestic species not assessed by the IUCN), 14.0% (943 species) are Not Evaluated (NE) on the IUCN Red List because they are not recognized in the IUCN taxonomy.
“Of the 6,742 wild mammal species (excluding the 17 domestic species not assessed by the IUCN) recognized in MDD2, 14.0% (943 species) are Not Evaluated (NE) on the IUCN Red List because they are not recognized in the IUCN taxonomy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IUCN 2024a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Species-rank name type localities are concentrated in high-elevation regions, islands, and biodiversity hotspots.
“Species-rank name type localities are concentrated throughout high-elevation regions (e.g., Andes, East African and Ethiopian highlands, and Himalayas), islands (e.g., Madagascar, the Philippines, and Sulawesi), and in biodiversity hotspots (e.g., Atlantic Forest).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
A large proportion of the names proposed as species during 1881-1939 are now treated as subspecies or synonyms.
“A large proportion of the names proposed as species during this time period are now treated as subspecies or synonyms (Fig. 1, upper panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 44 years since the publication of C&H1 (1980) have seen a nearly 70% increase in the number of recognized mammal species.
“The 44 yrs since the publication of C&H1 (Corbet and Hill 1980) have seen a nearly 70% increase in the number of recognized mammal species (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Mammal species estimates further decreased to 4,237 species in Morris (1965).
“Mammal species estimates further decreased to 4,237 species in Morris (1965), who based his total on various compendia plus recent primary literature that had synonymized names described in previous decades.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Morris (1965)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The historical estimates of mammal species richness from different sources are comparable enough to track trends.
- Findingreasoning
New data and tools have not quieted the debate regarding 'how distinct' a given population should be to be recognized as a separate species, especially given the substantial histories of introgressive hybridization now being uncovered within some mammal clades.
“Nevertheless, new data and tools have not quieted the debate regarding “how distinct” a given population should be to be recognized as a separate species, especially given the substantial histories of introgressive hybridization that are now being uncovered within some mammal clades.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Total recognized species richness has increased by ~25% since MSW3 (2005).
“Similarly, total recognized species richness has increased by ∼46% in the 4 decades since MSW2 (Wilson and Reeder 1993; Cole et al. 1994), ∼25% since MSW3 (Wilson and Reeder 2005; Reeder et al. 2007), and ∼4% since the release of MDD1 (Burgin et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wilson and Reeder 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Reeder et al. 2007 source
- Findingreasoning
These dynamics contributed to the description of many names initially proposed as species or subspecies that are now recognized as a single species with intraspecific variation (e.g., over 200 available synonymous names referable to Thomomys bottae).
“These dynamics contributed to the description of many names initially proposed as species or subspecies that are now recognized as a single species with intraspecific variation (e.g., over 200 available synonymous names referable to Thomomys bottae, as defined in MDD2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The earliest known estimate following the descriptive peak is ~15,000 extant mammal species in the first edition of General Zoology (Storer 1943).
“The earliest known estimate following the descriptive peak is ∼15,000 extant mammal species in the first edition of General Zoology (Storer 1943).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Storer 1943
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The historical estimates of mammal species richness from different sources are comparable enough to track trends.
- Findingcitation
Estimates of total mammal species richness continued to decrease before reaching a low in 1980 when Corbet and Hill listed 4,005 recent mammal species (C&H1).
“Estimates of total mammal species richness continued to decrease before reaching a low in 1980 when Corbet and Hill listed 4,005 recent mammal species (C&H1), being the first known publication since the peak of mammalian descriptive taxonomy to include a complete list of every then-recognized valid mammal species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C&H1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The historical estimates of mammal species richness from different sources are comparable enough to track trends.
- Findingcitation
Total recognized species richness has increased by ~46% in the 4 decades since MSW2 (1993).
“Similarly, total recognized species richness has increased by ∼46% in the 4 decades since MSW2 (Wilson and Reeder 1993; Cole et al. 1994), ∼25% since MSW3 (Wilson and Reeder 2005; Reeder et al. 2007), and ∼4% since the release of MDD1 (Burgin et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wilson and Reeder 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Cole et al. 1994 source
- Findingnone given
By the 1920s, new taxonomic descriptions usually appeared in articles focused on individual taxa, regions, or expeditions published in journals instead of monographic books.
“By the 1920s, new taxonomic descriptions usually appeared in articles focused on individual taxa, regions, or expeditions published in journals instead of monographic books.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Total recognized species richness has increased by ~4% since the release of MDD1 (2018).
“Similarly, total recognized species richness has increased by ∼46% in the 4 decades since MSW2 (Wilson and Reeder 1993; Cole et al. 1994), ∼25% since MSW3 (Wilson and Reeder 2005; Reeder et al. 2007), and ∼4% since the release of MDD1 (Burgin et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burgin et al. 2018 source
- Findingown data
Recent changes to mammal taxonomy have been bidirectional, often involving both synonymization and new species recognition.
“Despite controversy over whether this shift constitutes “taxonomic inflation” (e.g., Zachos et al. 2013; Groves 2014), the recent changes to mammal taxonomy have been bidirectional, often involving both synonymization and new species recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingreasoning
Descriptive taxonomic activity began decreasing after the 1920s, especially into the late 1930s and 1940s following the Great Depression and World War II.
“Descriptive taxonomic activity began decreasing after the 1920s, and especially into the late 1930s and 1940s following the Great Depression and leading into World War II.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
These generic revisions have changed the binomial names of at least 514 species that are recognized in both MDD2 and MSW3, a conservative estimate that does not consider generic changes to the many post-MSW3 species recognitions.
“These generic revisions have changed the binomial names of at least 514 species that are recognized in both MDD2 and MSW3, a conservative estimate that does not consider generic changes to the many post-MSW3 species recognitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Most names described during 1881-1939 were not actively cataloged in global-scale compendia (other than Trouessart's series).
“Furthermore, most of the names described during this period were not actively cataloged in global-scale compendia (other than E.-L. Trouessart’s series cataloging living and fossil mammals earlier in the period; Trouessart 1897, 1899, 1905).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trouessart 1897, 1899, 1905
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The 64.9 species/yr rate is higher than the rate of 27.4 species/yr reported in Burgin et al. (2018) based on de novo descriptions alone.
“which is higher than the rate of 27.4 species/yr reported in Burgin et al. (2018) based on de novo descriptions alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burgin et al. 2018 source
- Findingown data
Some geographic regions have fewer newly recognized species and type localities than expected given their latitude and species richness.
“In contrast, some geographic regions have fewer newly recognized species (and type localities) than expected given their latitude and species richness (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Many mammal taxa lack sufficient geographic and taxonomic sampling to identify and interpret such hybridization histories (e.g., in the case of M. keenii and M. evotis).
“Many mammal taxa lack sufficient geographic and taxonomic sampling to identify and interpret such hybridization histories (e.g., in the case of M. keenii and M. evotis; Lausen et al. 2019, 2021; Morales et al. 2021; Upham et al. 2022b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
A linear regression of compendia-based data reveals an average rate of 64.9 species recognized per year.
“Conducting a linear regression of these compendia-based data reveals an average rate of 64.9 species recognized per year”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Recent progress in bridging the Linnaean shortfall for mammals has followed a latitudinal gradient, with more newly split species and de novo descriptions coming from tropical over temperate regions.
“Geographically, recent progress in bridging the Linnaean shortfall for mammals has followed a latitudinal gradient, with more newly split species and de novo descriptions coming from tropical over temperate regions (Fig. 2, Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 recognizes 6,759 mammal species.
“With 6,759 recognized mammal species and >50,000 species-rank names, MDD2 provides a comprehensive resource that not only lessens aspects of the Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls but also highlights critical remaining knowledge gaps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The total number of IUCN-assessed species is 759 fewer than recognized in MDD2 (excluding domestic species not assessed by the IUCN).
“The total number of IUCN-assessed species is also 759 fewer than recognized in MDD2 (excluding domestic species not assessed by the IUCN).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In China, extensive systematic research throughout the 21st century has resulted in many newly recognized species.
“In China, extensive systematic research throughout the 21st century has resulted in many newly recognized species (see Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Approximately 25% of mammal species remain understudied on the IUCN Red List.
“MDD2 also reveals a pressing conservation challenge: the ∼25% of mammal species that remain understudied on the IUCN Red List raises alarms about the need to address these knowledge gaps and prevent unrecognized biodiversity loss (Ceballos et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDD2 includes more than 50,000 species-rank names.
“With 6,759 recognized mammal species and >50,000 species-rank names, MDD2 provides a comprehensive resource that not only lessens aspects of the Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls but also highlights critical remaining knowledge gaps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
∼25% of wild mammal species remain "understudied" relative to the IUCN Red List-either Not Evaluated (∼14%) or Data Deficient (∼11%).
“Despite advances in the understanding of species-rank taxonomy and geographic distributions since MSW3, ∼25% of wild mammal species remain “understudied” relative to the IUCN Red List–either Not Evaluated (i.e., unclassified; ∼14%) or classified as Data Deficient (∼11%; Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If the observed trends continue, there will be approximately 7,079 mammal species by 2030.
“leading to projections of ∼7,079 species by 2030 and ∼8,376 by 2050 if these trends continue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The past rate of mammal species recognition/description since 1980 will continue into the future.
- Rests on an assumption: The species totals from the 14 mammalian compendia are comparable and accurate enough to estimate a global rate of species recognition.
- Premisecitation
Identifying which species are recognized and how they are defined affects inferred biodiversity patterns at local, regional, and global scales, including assessments of conservation priorities and threats.
“Progress in this arena is critical because identifying which species are recognized and how they are defined affects inferred biodiversity patterns at local, regional, and global scales, including assessments of conservation priorities and threats (Mace 2004; Thomson et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
If the observed trends continue, there will be approximately 8,376 mammal species by 2050.
“leading to projections of ∼7,079 species by 2030 and ∼8,376 by 2050 if these trends continue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The past rate of mammal species recognition/description since 1980 will continue into the future.
- Rests on an assumption: The species totals from the 14 mammalian compendia are comparable and accurate enough to estimate a global rate of species recognition.
- Premisecitation
In mammals, recent advances in morphometric, molecular, statistical, and ecological tools used to distinguish previously cryptic taxa-coupled with the increasing globalization of mammalogical research efforts-have led to widespread taxonomic changes.
“In mammals, recent advances in the morphometric, molecular, statistical, and ecological tools used to distinguish previously cryptic taxa—coupled with the increasing globalization of mammalogical research efforts—have led to widespread taxonomic changes (Patterson 2000; Reeder et al. 2007; Burgin et al. 2018; Álvarez-Castañeda et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisereasoning
Species boundaries are constantly changing over time via advances in taxonomy-related fields, leading to the lumping, splitting, and new description of species.
“However, species boundaries are constantly changing over time via advances in taxonomy-related fields, leading to the lumping, splitting, and new description of species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Groves and Grubb (2011) recommended a large number of taxonomic changes within Perissodactyla and terrestrial Artiodactyla that were largely based on qualitative morphological characteristics with small sample sizes.
“Groves and Grubb (2011) recommended a large number of taxonomic changes within Perissodactyla and terrestrial Artiodactyla that were largely based on qualitative morphological characteristics with small sample sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groves and Grubb 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductcitation
The MDD retained changes from Groves and Grubb that have been subsequently validated by peer-reviewed research (e.g., Nanger gazelles).
“The exception was for the MDD to retain changes that have been subsequently validated by peer-reviewed research (e.g., Nanger gazelles; Lorenzen et al. 2008; Siegismund et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lorenzen et al. 2008 source
- cites Siegismund et al. 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Corbet and Hill (1980) is the first publication to include a complete list of contemporarily recognized mammal species in the 20th century.
“Corbet and Hill (1980) is the first publication to include a complete list of contemporarily recognized mammal species in the 20th century, which is why we use that publication as the starting point.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Corbet and Hill (1980)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Projecting the observed rate of species recognition to the future, there would be ∼11,619 species by 2100.
“∼11,619 by 2100”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The observed trend in mammal species recognition from 1980 to 2024 will continue into the future.
- Interpretationcitation
The largest single-version difference-between versions 1.1 and 1.2-is largely attributed to the removal of the Groves and Grubb (2011) taxonomy for Perissodactyla and terrestrial Artiodactyla.
“The largest single-version difference—between versions 1.1 and 1.2—is largely attributed to the removal of the Groves and Grubb (2011) taxonomy for Perissodactyla and terrestrial Artiodactyla”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groves and Grubb (2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Projecting the observed rate of species recognition to the future, there would be ∼7,079 species by 2030.
“Projecting this rate of species recognition to the future, there would be ∼7,079 species by 2030”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The observed trend in mammal species recognition from 1980 to 2024 will continue into the future.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The MDD excluded a number of recently suggested taxonomic changes and new species, subspecies, and generic names described by Raymond Hoser.
“Second, the MDD excluded a number of recently suggested taxonomic changes and new species, subspecies, and generic names described by Raymond Hoser, who has prolifically named species in a self-published journal, generally using data from other publications as justification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Projecting the observed rate of species recognition to the future, there would be ∼7,727 species by 2040.
“∼7,727 by 2040”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The observed trend in mammal species recognition from 1980 to 2024 will continue into the future.
- Interpretationreasoning
Projecting the observed rate of species recognition to the future, there would be ∼8,376 species by 2050.
“∼8,376 by 2050”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The observed trend in mammal species recognition from 1980 to 2024 will continue into the future.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The MDD excluded almost all of the new taxonomic arrangements proposed in Groves and Grubb's Ungulate Taxonomy.
“The first was to exclude almost all of the new taxonomic arrangements proposed in Groves and Grubb’s Ungulate Taxonomy (Groves and Grubb 2011; Groves et al. 2011; Burgin et al. 2020)—a change that was made in MDD v1.2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Groves and Grubb 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Groves et al. 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Burgin et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Manual data curation by a dedicated team of students and volunteers has been crucial in collating data and linking contained biodiversity knowledge for the MDD.
“Because much of the information used to update the MDD is in rare archives, offline sources, or behind paywalls, manual data curation by a dedicated team of students and volunteers has been crucial in collating these data and linking their contained biodiversity knowledge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Much of the information used to update the MDD is in rare archives, offline sources, or behind paywalls.
- Interpretationreasoning
This standardization contributed to the rapid increase in mammalian taxonomic activity during the late 19th and early 20th century.
“This standardization contributed to the rapid increase in mammalian taxonomic activity during the late 19th and early 20th century, which was also characterized by an increasing prevalence in the use of the subspecies rank (replacing forms and varieties).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The decrease in species-rank name descriptions during 1940-1999 likely stems from multiple factors, including global political instability that shifted research funding away from systematics.
“This decrease in species-rank name descriptions likely stems from multiple factors, including global political instability that shifted research funding away from systematics (e.g., World War II, the Cold War).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Significant advances in the philosophy of species concepts, evolutionary theory, availability of specimens, and molecular methods during 1940-1999 contributed to a shift from descriptive to revisionary taxonomy.
“There were also significant advances in the philosophy of species concepts, evolutionary theory, availability of specimens, and molecular methods during this period that contributed to a shift from descriptive to revisionary taxonomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The order Primates likely contains considerably less remaining cryptic species, owing to focused and ongoing taxonomic research during the 21st century (161 new species since MSW3, 30.8% of valid Primates species in MDD2).
“Conversely, the order Primates likely is predicted to contain considerably less remaining cryptic species, owing to focused and ongoing taxonomic research during the 21st century (161 new species since MSW3, 30.8% of valid Primates species in MDD2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Sampling difficulties are often exacerbated by the costs of fieldwork, specimen curation, and genome sequencing.
“Sampling difficulties are often exacerbated by the costs of fieldwork, specimen curation, and genome sequencing, but newfound efficacy with the sequencing of genomes from preserved museum specimens promises to soon fill many populational gaps (e.g., Card et al. 2021; Raxworthy and Smith 2021; Benham and Bowie 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Contemporary mammal systematics focuses on evaluating the number of independent lines of evidence that support or refute distinctiveness of a taxon (integrative taxonomy).
“Contemporary mammal systematics now focuses on evaluating the number of independent lines of evidence that support or refute distinctiveness of a taxon (i.e., integrative taxonomy; Dayrat 2005; Padial”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Newfound efficacy with the sequencing of genomes from preserved museum specimens promises to soon fill many populational gaps.
“Sampling difficulties are often exacerbated by the costs of fieldwork, specimen curation, and genome sequencing, but newfound efficacy with the sequencing of genomes from preserved museum specimens promises to soon fill many populational gaps (e.g., Card et al. 2021; Raxworthy and Smith 2021; Benham and Bowie 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisereasoning
Those estimates were both based on partial histories of mammal species description that ignore taxonomic changes from species splitting and lumping, focusing only on de novo species descriptions.
“However, those estimates were both based on partial histories of mammal species description that ignore taxonomic changes resulting from species splitting and lumping, instead focusing only on de novo species descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Considerable gaps remain in collective knowledge of mammal species-rank taxonomy and geographic distributions (the Linnaean and Wallacean shortfalls).
“Despite recent progress, considerable gaps remain in our collective knowledge of mammal species-rank taxonomy and geographic distributions—termed the Linnaean and Wallacean shortfalls, respectively (Hortal et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hortal et al. 2015 source
- Premisecitation
The potential for unidentified cryptic mammal species remains high, particularly within small-bodied and wide-ranging taxa.
“The potential for unidentified cryptic mammal species remains high, particularly within small-bodied and wide-ranging taxa.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A meta-analysis across metazoans similarly supported the conclusion that body mass and range size predict unrecognized cryptic species.
“A meta-analysis across metazoans similarly supported this conclusion (Cahill et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cahill et al. 2024 source
- Premisecitation
That pace exceeded the previous estimate of 7,500 total species based on the same method.
“That pace exceeded the previous estimate of 7,500 total species based on the same method (Reeder et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reeder et al. 2007 source
- Interpretationcitation
These geographic concentrations of mammal taxonomic activity are consistent with previous estimates.
“These geographic concentrations of mammal taxonomic activity are consistent with previous estimates (Patterson 2000; Reeder et al. 2007; Burgin et al. 2018; Moura and Jetz 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The recent taxonomic history of primates and terrestrial ungulates best illustrates the impact that conservation can have on species recognition.
“The recent taxonomic history of primates and terrestrial ungulates (Perissodactyla and non-cetacean Artiodactyla) best illustrates the impact that conservation can have on species recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Failing to integrate MDD with IUCN risks unnoticed species declines or population extinctions for the ∼25% of mammal species that are understudied and the other ∼25% classified as threatened.
“Failing to do so risks unnoticed species declines or population extinctions, both for the ∼25% of mammal species that are understudied and the other ∼25% classified as threatened.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The IUCN-to-MDD2 gap is due to multiple infrastructural and sociological factors that lead to delays in integrating the latest research findings into the IUCN taxonomy.
“This IUCN-to-MDD2 gap is due to multiple factors, both infrastructural and sociological, that lead to delays in the integration of the latest research findings into the IUCN taxonomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Conservation practices in mammals often prioritize named taxonomic units like species and subspecies as the primary units of conservation, as seen in global frameworks like the IUCN Red List and national frameworks like the Endangered Species Act and Species at Risk Act.
“Conservation practices in mammals often prioritize named taxonomic units like species and subspecies as the primary units of conservation, as seen in global frameworks like the IUCN Red List and national frameworks like the Endangered Species Act in the United States and Species at Risk Act in Canada.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The publication of Ungulate Taxonomy (Groves and Grubb 2011), which split many ungulate species, served as a similar catalyst for taxonomic revision within ungulates.
“The publication of Ungulate Taxonomy (Groves and Grubb 2011), which split many ungulate species, served as a similar catalyst for taxonomic revision within ungulates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groves and Grubb 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Not all MDD2-IUCN differences are due to a lack of updated taxonomy; some clades have more regularly updated taxonomic arrangements that differ from MDD2 based on taxonomic opinion, such as marine mammals and primates.
“It should be noted that not all MDD2-IUCN differences are due to a lack of updated taxonomy since some clades have had more regularly updated taxonomic arrangements that differ from MDD2 based on taxonomic opinion, such as marine mammals and primates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These two groups have experienced contrasting taxonomic trajectories thus far in the 21st century.
“However, the similarities end there because these 2 groups have experienced contrasting taxonomic trajectories thus far in the 21st century.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The proposed "traffic-light system" of Kitchener et al. (2022) focused mainly on the extent of species evidence.
“In contrast, the proposed “traffic-light system” of Kitchener et al. (2022) focused mainly on the extent of species evidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kitchener et al. 2022 source
- Interpretationreasoning
MDD2 lessens aspects of the Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls.
“MDD2 provides a comprehensive resource that not only lessens aspects of the Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls but also highlights critical remaining knowledge gaps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 70
- May combine two claims. 93
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationA collaboration with Yale University researchers enabled the digitization of geographic range maps as polygon shapefiles for all mammal species, as matched to the taxonomies of MDD v1.2, HMW series, and CMW.
“A further collaboration with Yale University researchers enabled the digitization of geographic range maps as polygon shapefiles for all mammal species, as matched to the taxonomies of MDD v1.2, HMW series, and CMW (see Marsh et al. 2022 and map downloads updated to MDD v1.4 via the “mddmaps” R package; Robles-Fernández 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Marsh et al. 2022 source
The Introduction and Materials and Methods describe digitized range maps harmonized to MDD v1.2, HMW, and CMW and provided as shapefiles; the Biosketch identifies the lead author as based at Yale University. However, Table 1 and the Harmonisation between data sources section state that a few species in each taxonomy lack georeferenced range maps, so the claim that shapefiles were produced for all species is too absolute. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Robles-Fernández 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese changes have been controversial within the mammalogical community, and many specialists have subsequently reverted to the taxonomy presented in MSW3.
“These changes have been controversial within the mammalogical community, and many specialists have subsequently reverted to the taxonomy presented in MSW3 (e.g., Holbrook 2013; Gutiérrez and Garbino 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Holbrook 2013 source
- cites Gutiérrez and Garbino 2018 source
The Introduction and the section on objective criteria describe recent criticism of Groves and Grubb’s ungulate taxonomy and identify several controversial aspects of it. They do not report that many specialists subsequently reverted to the taxonomy in MSW3 (searched: MSW3 and reversion to earlier taxonomy). Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecognition of these domestic forms as distinct species by the MDD contradicts much of the evolutionary and taxonomic research on these taxa, which has shown that the wild and domestic forms should be considered a single species in most cases.
“Recognition of these domestic forms as distinct species by the MDD contradicts much of the evolutionary and taxonomic research on these taxa, which has shown that the wild and domestic forms should be considered a single species in most cases (e.g., Driscoll et al. 2007; Groenen 2016; Jackson et al. 2019, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Driscoll et al. 2007 source
- cites Groenen 2016 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Jackson et al. 2019, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe recent and rapid net increase in recognized mammal species is comparable to activity in other major clades of life, for example, reptiles: +49% from 1995 to 2024; amphibians: +60% from 1985 to 2024; foraminifera: +21% from 1987 to 2020.
“The recent and rapid net increase in recognized mammal species is comparable to activity in other major clades of life, for example, reptiles: +49% from 1995 to 2024 (Uetz 2016; Uetz et al. 2024); amphibians: +60% from 1985 to 2024 (AmphibiaWeb 2024); foraminifera: +21% from 1987 to 2020 (Hayward et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Uetz 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Uetz et al. 2024 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites AmphibiaWeb 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHistorically, much of the mammalogical research done in Global South countries was done by researchers from Europe and North America, leading to limited taxonomic research funding and access to museum specimens for Global South researchers.
“Historically, much of the mammalogical research done in Global South countries was done by researchers from Europe and North America, leading to limited taxonomic research funding and access to museum specimens for Global South researchers (Salvador et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Salvador et al. 2022 source
The Discussion’s Geography section says developing countries lack taxonomists, infrastructure, and funding, and the Abstract identifies lack of research funding especially in the Global South. Neither passage establishes that European and North American researchers historically conducted much of the mammalogical research in Global South countries, that this caused the funding gap, or that Global South researchers lack access to museum specimens. Page numbers were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese shortfalls pose hurdles to zoonotic disease studies and other biomedical research as well as to implementation of species conservation and management plans.
“These shortfalls pose hurdles to zoonotic disease studies and other biomedical research (Upham et al. 2021) as well as to the implementation of species conservation and management plans (Senior et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Upham et al. 2021 source
- cites Senior et al. 2024 source
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that conservation interventions are insufficient or absent for many threatened species, and the Main section calls better documentation a critical first step toward improving conservation practices. This supports a broad link between the shortfalls and conservation action, but the paper does not specifically assess whether they hinder implementation of species conservation or management plans. The biomedical-research portion is attributed to a different citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation17% to 93% of the genomes of European Myotis bats apparently have introgressive origins, suggesting that many genomic regions can be freely exchanged as long as certain other regions are conserved, protecting the distinctiveness of a given species.
“Consistent with this finding is the observation that 17% to 93% of the genomes of European Myotis bats apparently have introgressive origins (Foley et al. 2024), suggesting that many genomic regions can be freely exchanged as long as certain other regions are conserved, protecting the distinctiveness of a given species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Foley et al. 2024 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMammals can serve as sentinels of change in threatened ecosystems or key nodes in pathogen-sharing networks.
“This is particularly true for mammals given that they can serve as sentinels of change in threatened ecosystems (Moore 2008; Marneweck et al. 2022) or key nodes in pathogen-sharing networks (Plowright et al. 2021; Venkatesan 2023; Weber et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTaxonomy and nomenclature are not static; creation of species lists is plagued by gaps in biodiversity knowledge, differing taxonomic opinions, failure to track and digitally integrate changing taxonomies, and inconsistencies in ICZN Code implementation.
“However, as discussed throughout this article, taxonomy and nomenclature are by no means static—the creation of species lists is plagued by gaps in biodiversity knowledge (i.e., the Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls), differing taxonomic opinions, failure to track and digitally integrate those changing taxonomies, and inconsistencies in how the ICZN Code is implemented (Garnett and Christidis 2017;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Garnett and Christidis 2017 source
- cites Raposo et al. 2017, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Franz and Sterner 2018 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRecognized Giraffa diversity has ranged from 1 to 11 species, but most workers now recognize 4 species based on integrative taxonomic approaches.
“For example, recognized Giraffa diversity has ranged from 1 to 11 species, but most workers now recognize 4 species based on integrative taxonomic approaches (Winter et al. 2018; Petzold and Hassanin 2020; Coimbra et al. 2021; Kargopoulos et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Winter et al. 2018 source
The Introduction and Discussion support a historical one-species classification and this paper’s evidence for four species. But the Introduction says up to eleven *subspecies*, not eleven species; the Discussion mentions proposals of up to eight species. The paper also says the four-species conclusion may not be fully accepted and calls for revision of the IUCN’s one-species classification, so it does not support the claim that most workers now recognize four. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Petzold and Hassanin 2020 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) documents a historical one-species classification and reports that two studies proposed four species. It does not document a range extending to 11 species or say that most workers now recognize four; instead, it describes the four-species proposal as controversial. The Abstract and conservation-management conclusion (pages unavailable) favor three species based on this paper’s analyses. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Coimbra et al. 2021 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis practice can overlook finer-scale intraspecific diversity and taxonomically unrecognized species in understudied taxa, resulting in loss of cryptic biodiversity.
“However, this practice can overlook finer-scale intraspecific diversity (Des Roches et al. 2021) and taxonomically unrecognized species in understudied taxa (i.e., “dark extinctions”; Boehm and Cronk 2021), resulting in the loss of cryptic biodiversity (see review by Hending 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Des Roches et al. 2021 source
- cites Boehm and Cronk 2021 source
- cites Hending 2025 source
The Introduction (‘Why do many cryptic species remain undetected?’; page unavailable) says morphologically indistinguishable species have historically been overlooked. ‘Cryptic species recognition’ says visually based assessments underestimate biodiversity and can misinform conservation, while ‘Recent taxonomic description’ identifies greater extinction risk for newly recognized species. These passages support the concern behind the citation, but do not establish that overlooking them has resulted in an actual loss of cryptic biodiversity. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMDD2 governance includes a rewritten website that improves access and scalability.
“a rewritten website that improves access and scalability”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe American Society of Mammalogists launched the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) in 2018, which then recognized ∼20% more mammal species (+1,251 and -172 species) compared to MSW3.
“the American Society of Mammalogists launched the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) in 2018, which then recognized ∼20% more mammal species (+1,251 and –172 species) compared to the previous authoritative compendium, the Mammal Species of the World, third edition (MSW3; Wilson and Reeder 2005; Burgin et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wilson and Reeder 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Burgin et al. 2018 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAreas of high mammal endemism include Madagascar, Philippines, Andes, East Africa, Himalayas, and Atlantic Forest.
“highlighting areas of high mammal endemism (e.g., Madagascar, Philippines, Andes, East Africa, Himalayas, Atlantic Forest)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMDD2 governance includes the establishment of external taxonomic subcommittees to guide data collection and curation.
“Governance advancements in MDD2 include the establishment of external taxonomic subcommittees to guide data collection and curation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMDD2 governance includes a cross-platform mobile application that provides offline access.
“a cross-platform mobile application that provides offline access”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMDD2 governance includes new partnerships to continue linking MDD data to global biodiversity infrastructure.
“and new partnerships to continue linking MDD data to global biodiversity infrastructure”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe paper identifies 4 major time periods of change in mammalian taxonomy and nomenclature over the past 267 years: (i) 1758 to 1880 initial monographic description of traditionally charismatic species; (ii) 1881 to 1939 peak of descriptive taxonomy, describing subspecies, and publishing in journals; (iii) 1940 to 1999 shift toward revisionary taxonomy and recognizing polytypic species; and (iv) 2
“identifying 4 major time periods of change in mammalian taxonomy and nomenclature: (i) the initial monographic description of traditionally charismatic species (1758 to 1880); (ii) the peak of descriptive taxonomy, describing subspecies, and publishing in journals (1881 to 1939); (iii) the shift toward revisionary taxonomy and recognizing polytypic species (1940 to 1999); and (iv) the current”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe MDD2 taxonomy documents a net increase of 339 (27.6%) genera, 38 (29.5%) families, and 6 (28.6%) orders since C&H1.
“the MDD2 taxonomy documents a net increase of 339 (27.6%) genera, 38 (29.5%) families, and 6 (28.6%) orders since C&H1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVersion 1.11 marked the beginning of collaborations between the MDD and Hesperomys and Batnames, leading to many changes in taxonomy (15 de novo; 49 splits; 29 lumps) and nomenclature (e.g., spelling changes to 52 species-rank specific epithets) despite a gap of only 5 mo between MDD v1.10 and v1.11 release dates.
“Version 1.11 is also notable because it marked the beginning of collaborations between the MDD and Hesperomys and Batnames, which involved considerable efforts to reconcile information across the 3 databases, leading to many changes in taxonomy (15 de novo; 49 splits; 29 lumps) and nomenclature (e.g., spelling changes to 52 species-rank specific epithets) despite a gap of only 5 mo between MDD v1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe MDD2 taxonomy documents a net increase of 123 (10.0%) genera and 14 (8.4%) families since MSW3.
“a net increase of 123 (10.0%) genera and 14 (8.4%) families since MSW3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenSubspecies of bats are currently only listed in Batnames.
“(however, subspecies of bats are currently only listed in Batnames)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe representatives of 17 mammal species domesticated by humans during prehistoric times are considered separate species from their ancestors in the MDD; all but 2 of these (Bos primigenius and the unknown ancestor of Camelus dromedarius) are extant.
“The representatives of 17 mammal species that were domesticated by humans during prehistoric times are considered separate species from their ancestors in the MDD, all but 2 of which (Bos primigenius and the unknown ancestor of Camelus dromedarius) are extant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThese data were primarily integrated into MDD2 species-rank synonym data, resulting in expanded coverage of type localities, type specimens, and other nomenclatural data.
“These data were primarily integrated into MDD2 species-rank synonym data, resulting in expanded coverage of type localities, type specimens, and other nomenclatural data detailed below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSince MDD1, Callitrichidae and Aotidae were recognized as distinct, while Eschrichtiidae was lumped into Balaenopteridae.
“The families Callitrichidae and Aotidae were recognized as distinct, while Eschrichtiidae was lumped into Balaenopteridae since MDD1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBetween MDD1 and MDD2, there were net differences of 37 more genera (1,316 to 1,353) and 1 more family (166 to 167) recognized, with no changes to the 27 orders.
“Between MDD1 and MDD2, there were net differences of 37 more genera (1,316 to 1,353) and 1 more family (166 to 167) recognized, with no changes to the 27 orders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest number of taxonomic changes between 2 MDD versions occurred between versions 1.1 and 1.2, versions 1.9.1 and 1.10, and versions 1.10 and 1.11.
“The highest number of taxonomic changes between 2 MDD versions occurred between versions 1.1 (March 2019) and 1.2 (September 2020), versions 1.9.1 (June 2022) and 1.10 (December 2022), and versions 1.10 and 1.11 (April 2023)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEfforts to coordinate with the ASM Mammal Images Library have aligned taxonomic names and concepts used in the expert-identified images to each new release of the MDD.
“Finally, efforts to coordinate with the ASM Mammal Images Library have aligned taxonomic names and concepts used in the expert-identified images to each new release of the MDD (available for download at https://www.mammalogy.org/image-library).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 2024-1 IUCN Red List includes 5,983 species, which is 776 fewer (-11.5%) than MDD2.
“the 2024-1 IUCN Red List includes 5,983 species, which is 776 fewer (–11.5%) than MDD2 despite being released the same year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe synonym list includes available and unavailable names; spelling variants and name combinations; and names associated with currently valid species, subspecies, synonyms, nomina dubia, or species inquirendae.
“The synonym list includes available and unavailable names; spelling variants and name combinations; and names that are associated with currently valid species, subspecies, synonyms, nomina dubia, or species inquirendae.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen comparing MDD1 and MDD2 directly, there were 296 de novo species, 321 split species, 357 lumped species, 11 missing species subsequently added, 6 removed species, 227 generic changes, 17 specific epithet name changes, and 148 spelling changes or corrections.
“there were 296 de novo species, 321 split species, 357 lumped species, 11 missing species that were subsequently added (mostly recently extinct and domestic species), 6 removed species (all either extinct species that did not survive recently enough for inclusion, or names now considered unavailable or nomina dubia), 227 generic changes, 17 specific epithet name changes, and 148 spelling changes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe 18 total releases of the MDD from MDD1 to MDD2 included 15 primary releases and 3 patch releases from August 2017 to August 2024.
“The 18 total releases of the MDD from MDD1 to MDD2 included 15 primary releases (i.e., 1.X and 1.XX releases) and 3 patch releases (i.e., 1.X.X releases) from August 2017 to August 2024”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 6,759 valid mammal species in MDD2, 6,629 are wild extant, 113 are extinct, and 17 are domestic.
“6,759 valid mammal species (6,629 wild extant; 113 extinct; 17 domestic)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe 3 most speciose mammal orders are Rodentia (2,747 species; 536 genera; 35 families), Chiroptera (1,485 species; 236 genera; 21 families), and Eulipotyphla (599 species; 61 genera; 5 families).
“The 3 most speciose mammal orders are still Rodentia (2,747 species; 536 genera; 35 families), Chiroptera (1,485 species; 236 genera; 21 families), and Eulipotyphla (599 species; 61 genera; 5 families)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe countries with the highest overall MDD website usage during the 17-month period were the United States (34.3%), Brazil (6.7%), Mexico (6.2%), and China (5.4%).
“The countries with the highest overall usage during this period were the United States (34.3% of users), Brazil (6.7%), Mexico (6.2%), and China (5.4%), which topped the 12 countries with over 500 users and the 50 countries with over 50 users (see Supplementary Data SD11 for complete usage data).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Google Analytics data accurately reflects the number of unique users and their locations.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe countries with the most type localities of valid species described during the 21st century are Brazil (98), Madagascar (78), Indonesia (57), China (53), and Peru (52).
“The countries with the most type localities of valid species described during the 21st century are Brazil (98 names), Madagascar (78), Indonesia (57), China (53), and Peru (52).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross terrestrial biogeographic realms, the Palearctic has the most available names with type localities in that region (20.5% of total available names), followed by Afrotropical (19.7%), Neotropical (19.4%), Indomalayan (15.4%), Nearctic (10.9%), Australasian (7.4%), Oceanian (0.2%), and Antarctic (<0.1%).
“the Palearctic has the most available names with type localities in that region (20.5% of total available names), followed by the Afrotropical (19.7%), Neotropical (19.4%), Indomalayan (15.4%), Nearctic (10.9%), Australasian (7.4%), Oceanian (0.2%), and Antarctic (<0.1%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the continental scale, Asia contains the most recognized mammal species, followed by Africa, South America, North America, Oceania, Europe, and Antarctica.
“Asia contains the most recognized mammal species, followed by Africa, South America, North America, Oceania, Europe, and Antarctica.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSince MSW3, 1,579 more species have been recognized as distinct (23.4% of all currently valid species), including 805 de novo and 774 split species listed in MDD2, while 226 species have been lumped or removed.
“Since MSW3, there have been 1,579 more species recognized as distinct (23.4% of all currently valid species), including 805 de novo and 774 split species listed in MDD2, while 226 species have been lumped or removed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMDD2 provides an online overview of research studies authored by mammalogists worldwide over the past 267 years (1758 to 2024).
“MDD2 provides an online overview of research studies authored by mammalogists worldwide over the past 267 yrs (1758 to 2024), jointly illuminating the latest advances in taxonomic understanding of this charismatic vertebrate clade.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll other mammal families have fewer than 200 species, with 24 families having only 1 extant species.
“All other mammal families have fewer than 200 species, with 24 families having only 1 extant species”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 3 most speciose genera are Crocidura (220 species), Myotis (139 species), and Rhinolophus (114 species), which are also the only mammal genera exceeding 100 extant or recently extinct species.
“The 3 most speciose genera are Crocidura (220 species), Myotis (139 species), and Rhinolophus (114 species), which are also the only mammal genera exceeding 100 extant or recently extinct species”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn terms of species density per land area, Indomalaya has the highest density of mammal species, followed by Australasia, Neotropical, Afrotropical, Nearctic, Palearctic, and Oceania.
“Indomalaya has the highest density of mammal species, followed by the realms of Australasia, Neotropical, Afrotropical, Nearctic, Palearctic, and Oceania”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFew newly described names from the 21st century have type localities in northern North America, Europe, and northern Asia; most that do are subspecific names or names now regarded as synonyms.
“Few newly described names from the 21st century have type localities in northern North America, Europe, and northern Asia, and most that do are either subspecific names or names now regarded as synonyms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataGlobal MDD website usage rates rose from an average of ~450 weekly users to ~700 between months 1-10 and 11-17 of tracking.
“Global usage rates rose from an average of ∼450 weekly users to ∼700 between months 1 to 10 and 11 to 17 of tracking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Google Analytics data accurately reflects the number of unique users and their locations.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMDD2 considers 113 species to be recently extinct and documents the extinction of 25 entire genera and 7 entire families since the year 1500.
“MDD2 considers 113 species to be recently extinct and documents the extinction of 25 entire genera and 7 entire families since the year 1500.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe orders with the largest number of threatened extant species are Primates (335 species; 64.2% of total MDD2 species), Rodentia (313; 11.4%), Chiroptera (217; 14.6%), and Artiodactyla (122; 32.9%).
“The orders with the largest number of threatened extant species are Primates (335 species; 64.2% of total MDD2 species), Rodentia (313; 11.4%), Chiroptera (217; 14.6%), and Artiodactyla (122; 32.9%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe most speciose mammalian families are Muridae (876 species; 156 genera), Cricetidae (869 species; 162 genera), Vespertilionidae (535 species; 60 genera), Soricidae (488 species; 28 genera), Sciuridae (321 species; 64 genera), Phyllostomidae (231 species; 61 genera), and Pteropodidae (202 species; 46 genera).
“The most speciose mammalian families are Muridae (876 species; 156 genera), Cricetidae (869 species; 162 genera), Vespertilionidae (535 species; 60 genera), Soricidae (488 species; 28 genera), Sciuridae (321 species; 64 genera), Phyllostomidae (231 species; 61 genera), and Pteropodidae (202 species; 46 genera).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese orders are followed by Primates (522 species; 84 genera; 19 families), Artiodactyla (371 species; 138 genera; 23 families), and Carnivora (319 species; 129 genera; 16 families); all other mammal orders have fewer than 200 recognized species.
“These orders are followed by Primates (522 species; 84 genera; 19 families), Artiodactyla (371 species; 138 genera; 23 families), and Carnivora (319 species; 129 genera; 16 families); all other mammal orders have fewer than 200 recognized species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningThe MDD2 dataset allows for novel explorations of how the recognized taxonomy of mammal species and higher taxa has changed through time.
“The MDD2 dataset allows for novel explorations of how the recognized taxonomy of mammal species and higher taxa has changed through time, which is briefly contextualized here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver a recent 17-month period, the MDD website was visited by 1,200 to 2,900 users/month for a total of 25,991 unique users located in 170 countries.
“Over a recent 17-mo period, it was visited by 1,200 to 2,900 users/mo for a total of 25,991 unique users that were located in 170 different countries (Google Analytics: 19 May 2023 to 19 October 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Google Analytics data accurately reflects the number of unique users and their locations.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the total species recognized in MDD2, 19.2% (1,295 species) are threatened with extinction and 11.5% (773 species) are classified as Data Deficient (DD).
“Of the total species recognized in MDD2, 19.2% (1,295 species) are threatened with extinction (VU, EN, CR, and EW IUCN statuses) and 11.5% (773 species) are classified as Data Deficient (DD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTubulidentata is currently the only mammal order with a single living species, since Microbiotheria now includes 2 species.
“Tubulidentata is currently the only mammal order with a single living species, since Microbiotheria now includes 2 species”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThere are 2 notable single-year spikes in species descriptions associated with single publications: Linnaeus (1758) with 208 names (152 currently valid species) and R. Kerr (1792) with 202 names (27 currently valid species).
“Linnaeus (1758) with 208 names (152 currently valid species) and R. Kerr in Britain (Kerr 1792) with 202 names (27 currently valid species).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe orders with the most species newly recognized since MSW3 are Rodentia (595 species; 21.7% of order total in MDD2), Chiroptera (410; 27.6%), Eulipotyphla (166; 27.7%), and Primates (161; 30.8%).
“The orders with the most species newly recognized since MSW3 are Rodentia (595 species; 21.7% relative to the order total in MDD2), Chiroptera (410; 27.6%), Eulipotyphla (166; 27.7%), and Primates (161; 30.8%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMDD2 recognizes 2 fewer orders than MSW3 because Soricomorpha and Erinaceomorpha are now lumped into a single order (Eulipotyphla), and Cetacea is now lumped into Artiodactyla.
“MDD2 recognizes 2 fewer orders than MSW3 because Soricomorpha and Erinaceomorpha are now lumped into a single order (Eulipotyphla), and Cetacea is now lumped into Artiodactyla.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenLinnaeus's Systema Naturae (10th edition) still holds the title of proposing the largest number of currently valid mammal species in a single publication.
“Binomial nomenclature and taxonomy for mammals and other animals starts with C. Linnaeus in Sweden (1758), whose Systema Naturae (10th edition) still holds the title of proposing the largest number of currently valid mammal species in a single publication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCrocidura exceeded 200 species and Rhinolophus exceeded 100 species as a result of new species recognized since MSW3.
“Crocidura exceeded 200 species and Rhinolophus exceeded 100 species as a result of new species recognized since MSW3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA large spike in MDD website traffic on 15-17 July 2024 involved 1,326 weekly users.
“A large spike in MDD website traffic on 15 to 17 July 2024 involved 1,326 weekly users, likely stemming from the MDD v1.13 taxonomy release on 13 July 2024.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Google Analytics data accurately reflects the number of unique users and their locations.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Neotropical realm contains the most newly recognized species since MSW3 (563 total species), followed by Afrotropical (294), Indomalaya (268), Palearctic (265), Australasia (131), Nearctic (114), and Oceania (3).
“the Neotropics also contain the most newly recognized species since MSW3 (563 total species), followed by the realms of Afrotropical (294), Indomalaya (268), Palearctic (265), Australasia (131), Nearctic (114), and Oceania (3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe curatorial efforts of MDD2, Hesperomys, and Batnames have uncovered extensive information relevant to the history of studying mammal taxa, especially type localities, type specimens, original description citations, and hyperlinks to sources.
“The curatorial efforts of MDD2, Hesperomys, and Batnames have uncovered extensive information relevant to the history of studying mammal taxa—especially type localities, type specimens, original description citations, and hyperlinks to those sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataArchived versions of the MDD taxonomy on Zenodo garnered 33,208 page views and 17,159 downloads over a 4-year period (September 2020 to October 2024).
“Archived versions of the MDD taxonomy on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4139722) have garnered 33,208 page views and 17,159 downloads over a 4-yr period (September 2020 to -October 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver the 20-yr period since MSW3, at least 1 new species has been recognized in 20 out of 27 orders and 98 out of 167 families of mammals.
“Over this same 20-yr period, at least 1 new species has been recognized in 20 out of 27 orders and 98 out of 167 families of mammals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe IUCN version 2024-1 recognizes 1,308 genera and 164 families, which is a net difference of 45 (3.3%) fewer genera and 3 (1.8%) fewer families than MDD2, but recognizes the same 27 orders.
“The IUCN version 2024-1 recognizes 1,308 genera and 164 families, which is a net difference of 45 (3.3%) fewer genera and 3 (1.8%) fewer families than MDD2, but recognizes the same 27 orders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenSpecies-rank names described during 1758-1880 were often based on illustrations or firsthand accounts of living or recently deceased animals without reference to voucher specimens.
“Species-rank names described during this period were often based on illustrations or firsthand accounts of living or recently deceased animals without reference to voucher specimens, but museum specimens would become the preferred reference material for biological descriptions later in the 19th and early 20th century (i.e., museum-based type material).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly 8 of 27 orders and 72 of 167 families of mammals are currently "completely evaluated" by the IUCN.
“Only 8 of 27 orders and 72 of 167 families of mammals are currently “completely evaluated” by the IUCN”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMammal research typifies activities of the taxonomic renaissance in 2 ways: increased splitting of existing species through taxonomic revisions (774 species split since MSW3); and proportionately more names described as new species rather than subspecies (83.4% of available names since 2000 are described as new species rather than subspecies, versus 36.1% from 1950 to 1999).
“Mammal research typifies activities of this renaissance in 2 ways: (i) increased splitting of existing species through taxonomic revisions (774 species split since MSW3); and (ii) proportionately more names described as new species rather than subspecies (83.4% of available names since 2000 are described as new species rather than subspecies, versus 36.1% from 1950 to 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenThe period 1881-1939 was also characterized by an increasing prevalence in the use of the subspecies rank (replacing forms and varieties).
“This standardization contributed to the rapid increase in mammalian taxonomic activity during the late 19th and early 20th century, which was also characterized by an increasing prevalence in the use of the subspecies rank (replacing forms and varieties).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningSpecies during 1881-1939 were often described based on subtle morphological distinctions, and some traits used for species diagnoses at this time are now known to vary substantially within species relative to environmental factors.
“Additionally, species were often described based on subtle morphological distinctions, and some of the traits used for species diagnoses at this time are now known to vary substantially within species relative to environmental factors (e.g., pelage coloration).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe recognized species richness of Microcebus mouse lemurs rose from 2 to 25 species over 4 decades, and was recently reduced to 19 species after an integrative taxonomic revision.
“Even the recognized species richness of groups such as Microcebus mouse lemurs, which rose from 2 to 25 species over 4 decades (Franz et al. 2020), was recently reduced to 19 species after an integrative taxonomic revision (van Elst et al. 2025—published after the MDD2 cutoff date).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Franz et al. 2020 source
- cites van Elst et al. 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMerriam's (1918) treatment of the Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) as ~74 distinct species in North America alone contrasts with the currently defined single Holarctic species.
“A prime example of the frequency with which now-synonymous names were proposed during this period is Merriam’s (1918) treatment of the Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) as ∼74 distinct species in North America alone, as opposed to the currently defined single Holarctic species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Merriam’s (1918) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMammal-focused expeditions occurred more frequently during 1881-1939, generally associated with colonial exploration, resulting in specimens being sent to museums in Europe and North America (rarely in the country of collection).
“Mammal-focused expeditions also occurred more frequently, generally associated with colonial exploration, resulting in specimens being sent to museums in Europe and North America (rarely in the country of collection; e.g., see Mohammed et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mohammed et al. 2022 source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenResearchers during 1881-1939 primarily described mammal species based on relatively few specimens sent to museums from widely separated localities.
“Researchers primarily described mammal species based on relatively few specimens sent to museums from widely separated localities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataC&H1 marks the shift from predominantly lumping species back to predominantly splitting species, as total estimates of extant mammal species richness began increasing thereafter.
“C&H1 marks the shift from predominantly lumping species back to predominantly splitting species, as total estimates of extant mammal species richness began increasing thereafter (Table 1, Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning226 species-rank names that were recognized as species in MSW3 have since been synonymized, or about 1 lump for every 6 newly recognized species from 2004 to 2024.
“For example, 226 species-rank names that were recognized as species in MSW3 have since been synonymized, or about 1 lump for every 6 newly recognized species from 2004 to 2024 (considering both de novo and split names).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring 1940-1999, fewer names were being described, and even fewer are now considered valid species (e.g., only 3 currently valid species were described in 1961).
“During this period, fewer names were being described, and even fewer are now considered valid species (e.g., only 3 currently valid species were described in 1961).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere has been a net increase of 123 recognized genera since MSW3, typically to establish generic monophyly, which has also been bidirectional (+178 and -55 genera).
“Similarly, there has been a net increase of 123 recognized genera since MSW3, typically to establish generic monophyly, which has also been bidirectional (+178 and –55 genera).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningPrototheria, Metatheria, and Eutheria are retained in the MDD to match the most common use of the names of extant mammals for the time being.
“Prototheria, Metatheria, and Eutheria are retained in the MDD to match the most common use of the names of extant mammals for the time being.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn contrast to the previous period, proportionately more new names described during the mid- to late 20th century were described as subspecies, and many names described earlier as species were joined together into polytypic species with many subspecies.
“In contrast to the previous period, proportionately more new names described during the mid- to late 20th century were described as subspecies, and many names described earlier as species were joined together into polytypic species with many subspecies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe period 1881-1939 is characterized by the appearance of more seriously cataloged museum type specimens and more precisely defined type localities.
“Thus, this period is further characterized by the appearance of more seriously cataloged museum type specimens and more precisely defined type localities (rather than broadly defined type localities at the country or continent level).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe Annals and Magazine of Natural History published the descriptions of 3,434 available species-rank mammal names from 1841 to 1959, 12.1% of available names in MDD2 (including 990 currently valid species).
“A single journal, the Annals and Magazine of Natural History, published the descriptions of 3,434 available species-rank mammal names from 1841 to 1959, 12.1% of available names in MDD2 (including 990 currently valid species).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenDidelphimorphia has both a high degree of potential for cryptic species and extensive recent taxonomic research, with over 50 new species recognized since MSW3 (39.7% of valid Didelphimorphia species in MDD2).
“Didelphimorphia stands out as having both a high degree of potential for cryptic species and extensive recent taxonomic research, with over 50 new species recognized since MSW3 (39.7% of valid Didelphimorphia species in MDD2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOnly around half of newly recognized tropical species are splits, whereas in Nearctic/North America and Palearctic/Europe splits form a higher proportion of new species recognitions since MSW3.
“Only around half of these newly recognized tropical species are splits, as opposed to the Nearctic/North America and Palearctic/Europe where splits form a higher proportion of new species recognitions since MSW3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Neotropics and Indomalaya have particularly high proportions of newly recognized species since MSW3, including 9 of the top 10 countries and top 2 continents for new species (South America and Asia).
“The Neotropics and Indomalaya have particularly high proportions of newly recognized species since MSW3, including 9 of the top 10 countries (Figs 2A and 4B) and top 2 continents for new species (South America and Asia; Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe 2000-2009 decadal total was 315 currently valid species, compared to originally 341 species in Burgin et al. 2018, reduced by synonymizations in MDD2.
“That decadal total compares to 315 during 2000 to 2009 (originally 341 species in Burgin et al. 2018, but reduced by synonymizations in MDD2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burgin et al. 2018 source
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor 2010-2019, the expectation was 418 valid de novo species descriptions, but only 369 currently valid species were actually described de novo.
“the expectation for 418 valid de novo species descriptions from 2010 to 2019 compares to only 369 currently valid species that were actually described de novo (i.e., with an authority year during this interval).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationPrimate species began being split with the publication of Primate Taxonomy (Groves 2001), which initiated a wave of taxonomic revisions that massively increased recognized species richness-176 species (Napier and Napier 1967) versus 376 in MSW3, growing to 522 in MDD2.
“Primates species began being split with the publication of Primate Taxonomy (Groves 2001), which was controversial at the time but initiated a wave of taxonomic revisions that massively increased their recognized species richness—176 species (Napier and Napier 1967) versus 376 in MSW3, growing to 522 in MDD2 (Groves 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Groves 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Napier and Napier 1967
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Groves 2014 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationBoth primates and terrestrial ungulates have been at the center of splitting versus lumping debates due to their inclusion of many traditionally charismatic species threatened with extinction (∼64% of primates and ∼40% of wild ungulates in MDD2 are threatened in the IUCN Red List).
“Both groups have been at the center of splitting versus lumping debates (e.g., Rylands and Mittermeier 2014; Gippoliti et al. 2018) due to their inclusion of many traditionally charismatic species threatened with extinction (∼64% of primates and ∼40% of wild ungulates in MDD2 are threatened in the IUCN Red List).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe IUCN Red List has assessed the conservation status of 5,983 mammal species as of version 2024-1, which is only 494 species more than were assessed in the 2008 IUCN Red List version (5,489 species).
“The IUCN Red List has assessed the conservation status of 5,983 mammal species as of version 2024-1, which is only 494 species more than were assessed in the 2008 IUCN Red List version (5,489 species; summarized in Schipper et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schipper et al. 2008 source
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBoth groups have received more frequent taxonomic updates in the IUCN than other mammals, with only ∼3% of primates and ∼8% of wild ungulates in MDD2 Not Evaluated by the IUCN.
“Both groups have received more frequent taxonomic updates in the IUCN than other mammals, with only ∼3% of primates and ∼8% of wild ungulates in MDD2 Not Evaluated by the IUCN.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenMost taxonomic changes incorporated into the MDD have, thus far, closely followed the most recent empirical evidence given in peer-reviewed articles, which each represent the current best hypothesis of species boundaries.
“Most taxonomic changes incorporated into the MDD have, thus far, closely followed the most recent empirical evidence given in peer-reviewed articles, which each represent the current best hypothesis of species boundaries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe IUCN completed the Global Mammal Assessment in 2008, which made range maps available for ∼95% of the species recognized in MSW3 (5,489 species).
“In 2008, the IUCN completed the landmark Global Mammal Assessment (GMA), which made range maps available for ∼95% of the species recognized in MSW3 (5,489 species; Schipper et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schipper et al. 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBy consistently following the most recent evidence from peer-reviewed literature, taxonomy in the MDD is designed to collectively reflect the most up-to-date taxonomic perspective of the global mammalogical community and thereby minimize subjective biases coming from the MDD team.
“By consistently following the most recent evidence from peer-reviewed literature, taxonomy in the MDD is designed to collectively reflect the most up-to-date taxonomic perspective of the global mammalogical community and thereby minimize subjective biases coming from the MDD team.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll currently recognized species on the MDD have been included within at least an order, family, and genus, with intermediary higher and lower ranks assigned when suggested in the literature.
“All currently recognized species on the MDD have been included within at least an order, family, and genus, with intermediary higher and lower ranks assigned when suggested in the literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll distributional listings are generally supported by a confirmed record of the species living there (a museum specimen or photographic evidence), with question marks for suspected but unconfirmed occurrences.
“All distributional listings are generally supported by a confirmed record of the species living there (i.e., a museum specimen or photographic evidence), although if a species is suspected to occur in a region but there is no evidence to confirm its presence a question mark is listed after the region name.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe MDD follows the ICZN Code to inform issues of the nomenclatural availability and spelling of scientific names.
“The MDD follows the ICZN Code to inform issues of the nomenclatural availability and spelling of scientific names”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningRecognizing domestic species emphasizes the wild forms as an entity to be separately considered and protected.
“Recognizing domestic species also emphasizes the wild forms as an entity to be separately considered and protected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenTo verify citation and associated nomenclatural data for each name, the MDD team has examined the original descriptions of each name, including the page number where the name or description first occurs and the exact month or day of publication when available.
“To verify citation and associated nomenclatural data for each name, the MDD team has examined the original descriptions of each name, including the page number where the name or description first occurs and the exact month or day of publication when available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationNomenclatural availability of each name was determined based on application of the ICZN Code and executive decisions by the ICZN on the protection or rejection of specific names when applicable.
“Nomenclatural availability of each name was determined based on application of the ICZN Code (ICZN 1999) as well as executive decisions made by the ICZN on the protection or rejection of specific names when applicable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites ICZN 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe MDD considers 8 terrestrial biogeographic realms as defined by Olson et al. (2001): Nearctic, Neotropical, Palearctic, Afrotropical, Indomalayan, Australasian, Oceanian, and Antarctic.
“The MDD considers 8 terrestrial biogeographic realms, as defined by Olson et al. (2001): Nearctic, Neotropical, Palearctic, Afrotropical, Indomalayan, Australasian, Oceanian, and Antarctic”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Olson et al. (2001) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenOn the current synonym sheet, the MDD has verified and copied the verbatim type locality from the original description text for names with verified citations.
“On the current synonym sheet, the MDD has now verified and copied the verbatim type locality from the original description text for names with verified citations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe MDD chooses to recognize these specific domestic forms as distinct species to avoid confusion regarding which forms are being discussed in various political and conservation situations.
“However, the MDD chooses to recognize these specific domestic forms as distinct species to avoid confusion regarding which forms are being discussed in various political and conservation situations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenCitations are considered verified when either a PDF of the cited source is obtained or a member of the MDD team has physically examined the cited source.
“Citations are considered verified when either a PDF of the cited source is obtained or when a member of the MDD team has physically examined the cited source.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll species believed to have been extant after the year 1500 CE, according to evidence published in the peer-reviewed literature, are included in the MDD.
“All species that are believed to have been extant after the year 1500 CE, according to evidence published in the peer-reviewed literature, are included in the MDD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenBeginning with v1.10 (December 2022), the MDD piloted a protocol for publishing taxonomic opinion "white papers" on Zenodo in collaboration with members of the Global Bat Taxonomy Working Group.
“However, beginning with v1.10 (December 2022), the MDD piloted a protocol for publishing taxonomic opinion “white papers” on Zenodo in collaboration with members of the Global Bat Taxonomy Working Group, which is part of the IUCN SSC Bat Specialist Group and aligned with Batnames.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIn cases where there is insufficient evidence to support a taxonomic change or if multiple conflicting taxonomic arrangements are published in rapid succession, the MDD team provides justifications and citations on the relevant per-species pages, with summaries given on the About page.
“In cases where there is insufficient evidence to support a taxonomic change or if multiple conflicting taxonomic arrangements are published in rapid succession, the MDD team provides justifications and citations on the relevant per-species pages, with summaries given on the About page at https://mammaldiversity.org.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe MDD acknowledges that recognizing these 17 domestic forms as species is a deviation from the species recognition standards outlined in the Taxonomic decision making section and follows the naming conventions for domestic species and their wild ancestors outlined by Gentry et al. (2004).
“Thus, the MDD acknowledges that recognizing these 17 domestic forms as species is a deviation from the species recognition standards outlined in the Taxonomic decision making section above and follows the naming conventions for domestic species and their wild ancestors outlined by Gentry et al. (2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gentry et al. (2004) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenMDD2 is a digital compendium of global mammal taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic information that is more complete and accessible than prior efforts.
“The Mammal Diversity Database version 2.0 (MDD2) is a digital compendium of global mammal taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic information that is more complete and accessible than prior efforts, providing a steppingstone to greater knowledge about mammalian biology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe 19th century saw significant philosophical advances in evolutionary theory, which drove further advances in the understanding of mammal biodiversity.
“The 19th century also saw significant philosophical advances in evolutionary theory, which drove further advances in the understanding of mammal biodiversity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe modern terms for the 3 extant mammal clades (Prototheria, Metatheria, Eutheria) were established by T.N. Gill (1872) and T.H. Huxley (1881).
“The modern terms for these 3 extant mammal clades were established by T.N. Gill (1872), who initially proposed Prototheria for monotremes and Eutheria for marsupials and placentals; and T.H. Huxley (1881), who then termed Metatheria for the marsupials (albeit not initially intended as a scientific name), leaving placental mammals in Eutheria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites T.N. Gill (1872)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites T.H. Huxley (1881)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe release of MDD1 7 years ago marked a shift from decadal printed volumes to semi-annual online versions.
“The release of MDD1 7 yrs ago marked a shift from decadal printed volumes to semi-annual online versions (Burgin et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burgin et al. 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe spike in MDD website traffic on 15-17 July 2024 likely stemmed from the MDD v1.13 taxonomy release on 13 July 2024.
“A large spike in MDD website traffic on 15 to 17 July 2024 involved 1,326 weekly users, likely stemming from the MDD v1.13 taxonomy release on 13 July 2024.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe higher classification of mammals began to take shape with H.M.D. de Blainville, who used reproductive biology and skull and skeletal features to group mammals into distinct subclasses: monotremes, marsupials, and placentals.
“The higher classification of mammals began to take shape with H.M.D. de Blainville, who used reproductive biology and skull and skeletal features to group mammals into distinct subclasses: monotremes (Ornithodelphes), marsupials (Didelphes), and placentals (Monodelphes; de Blainville 1816, 1864).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Blainville 1816, 1864
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe lack of structure spurred the need for standardized nomenclatural and taxonomic rules for zoological taxonomy, culminating in the publication of the International Rules of Zoological Nomenclature in 1905.
“The lack of structure spurred the need for standardized nomenclatural and taxonomic rules for zoological taxonomy, which culminated in the publication of the International Rules of Zoological Nomenclature in 1905 (Blanchard et al. 1905) that would eventually develop into the first edition of the ICZN Code (ICZN 1961).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Blanchard et al. 1905
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites ICZN 1961
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningPrior to the 1890s, taxonomic and nomenclatural practices were unstandardized, leading to differential naming systems and confusion regarding a given species proper name.
“Prior to the 1890s, taxonomic and nomenclatural practices were unstandardized, leading to differential naming systems and confusion regarding a given species proper name, especially as many authors knowingly renamed already-named species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe International Rules of Zoological Nomenclature established fundamental nomenclatural rules still used today, including the principle of priority, the use of physical type material and type localities, and the rule that names must be published according to the ICZN Code to be considered available.
“These documents established fundamental nomenclatural rules that are still used today including the principle of priority for scientific names, the use of physical type material and type localities to define species-rank names, and the rule that names must be published according to the ICZN Code to be considered available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe publication of The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals (Simpson 1945) is the foundation of modern mammalian ordinal and familial arrangements, based on a more complete consideration of the deep-time evolutionary history of both living and extinct mammals.
“The publication of The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals (Simpson 1945), which is the foundation of modern mammalian ordinal and familial arrangements, is based on a more complete consideration of the deep-time evolutionary history of both living and extinct mammals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Simpson 1945
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRevisionary taxonomy is perhaps the most appropriate characterization of mammal taxonomic change in the modern era, albeit with more frequent splitting than lumping.
“Thus, like the preceding time period discussed above, revisionary taxonomy is perhaps the most appropriate characterization of mammal taxonomic change in this modern era (albeit with more frequent splitting than lumping).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe estimate of ∼11,625 species by 2100 seems more far-fetched given that this trend is likely to level off at some point, but the ∼70% increase over the current MDD2 total would be equivalent to the 1980 to 2024 increase since C&H1 was published.
“The estimate of ∼11,625 species by 2100 seems more far-fetched given that this trend is likely to level off at some point, but the ∼70% increase over the current MDD2 total would be equivalent to the 1980 to 2024 increase since C&H1 was published.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningCurrently, broadening such conclusions into generalities is likely premature.
“Currently, broadening such conclusions into generalities is likely premature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIf the trend continues, total recognized mammal species richness will increase to ∼7,084 species by 2030 and ∼8,382 species by 2050.
“If this trend continues, we estimate that the total recognized mammal species richness will increase to ∼7,084 species by 2030 and ∼8,382 species by 2050.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Observed trends in historical species descriptions or species recognition will continue into the future.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationModern taxonomic research trends reflect a paradigm shift in how systematists define the species unit.
“Overall, trends in modern taxonomic research appear to reflect a paradigm shift in how systematists define the species unit (reviewed in Padial and De la Riva 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Padial and De la Riva 2021 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRelevant estimates of the number of known and unknown species will only be achieved by accounting for the dynamic nature of the taxonomic process itself.
“Lessa et al. (2024) reviewed this problem in detail, concluding that “relevant estimates of the number of known and unknown species will only be achieved by accounting for the dynamic nature of the taxonomic process itself” (p. 1365).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lessa et al. 2024 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationRates of de novo species description are only part of the discovery rates story, with the other major component being rates of species splitting and lumping from revisionary taxonomic efforts.
“Thus, these data reinforce the perspective that rates of de novo species description are only part of the “discovery rates” story (Alroy 2002), with the other major component being rates of species splitting and lumping that result from revisionary taxonomic efforts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alroy 2002 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese estimates are considerably higher than those given by Burgin et al. (2018) and Reeder et al. (2007), but are nonetheless realistic owing to the combined consideration of species splits, lumps, and de novo descriptions.
“Both of these estimates are considerably higher than those given by Burgin et al. (2018) and Reeder et al. (2007), but are nonetheless realistic owing to the combined consideration of species splits, lumps, and de novo descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2018, the MDD team estimated that recognized extant and recently extinct mammal richness will increase to 7,409 species by 2050 and to 9,009 by 2100 if observed trends in historical species descriptions were to continue.
“Using this approach in 2018, the MDD team estimated that recognized extant and recently extinct mammal richness will increase to 7,409 species by 2050 and to 9,009 by 2100 if observed trends in historical species descriptions were to continue (Burgin et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burgin et al. 2018 source
- The authors state this as an assumption: Observed trends in historical species descriptions or species recognition will continue into the future.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenThe digital availability of extracted evidence from taxonomic publications is a key resource needed to make consistent decisions across disparate taxa.
“In either case, the digital availability of extracted evidence from taxonomic publications is a key resource needed to make consistent decisions across disparate taxa.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisenone givenEfficient communication and application of biodiversity knowledge between conservation and biodiversity resources requires agreed-upon organismal units that can serve as foundational designations for downstream decisions.
“Efficient communication and application of biodiversity knowledge between conservation and biodiversity resources requires agreed-upon organismal units that can serve as foundational designations for downstream decisions made on those units.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationUntracked taxonomic rearrangements risk misallocation of resources, e.g., Sylvilagus mansuetus is listed by IUCN as Critically Endangered but is not recognized in MDD2 due to synonymization with S. bachmani.
“Untracked taxonomic rearrangements also risk the misallocation of resources (e.g., Sylvilagus mansuetus is listed by the IUCN as Critically Endangered, but is not recognized in MDD2 due to synonymization with S. bachmani; Álvarez-Castañeda and Lorenzo 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Álvarez-Castañeda and Lorenzo 2016 source
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDatabases such as ITIS and CoL are increasingly critical for national and international processes of biodiversity decision-making, but they still primarily rely on MSW3-based taxonomies and synonymies for mammals.
“Databases such as the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS 2025) and Catalog of Life (CoL 2025) are increasingly critical for national and international processes of biodiversity decision-making, but they still primarily rely on MSW3-based taxonomies and synonymies for mammals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites ITIS 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites CoL 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe MDD taxonomy increasingly serves as an arbiter of species recognition for conservation organizations at global, national, and regional levels.
“The MDD taxonomy increasingly serves as an arbiter of species recognition for conservation organizations at global (e.g., IUCN), national (e.g., NatureServe), and regional (e.g., state agencies) levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe value of accurately communicating "species" categories highlights the basal importance of taxonomy and nomenclature in biodiversity infrastructure.
“The value of accurately communicating “species” categories highlights the basal importance of taxonomy and nomenclature in biodiversity infrastructure (Grieneisen et al. 2014; Sterner et al. 2020a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Grieneisen et al. 2014 source
- cites Sterner et al. 2020a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationNeotropical countries like Brazil and Argentina stand out for their substantial zoological research capacity and international collaborations, helping establish the Neotropics as the top region for newly recognized mammal species.
“Neotropical countries like Brazil and Argentina stand out for their substantial zoological research capacity and international collaborations, helping establish the Neotropics as the top region for newly recognized mammal species (see Fig. 2 and Table 3; see also Dalapicolla and Percequillo 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dalapicolla and Percequillo 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe value of updated species lists to biodiversity science outweighs the pitfalls of maintaining them.
“Nevertheless, the value of updated species lists to biodiversity science outweighs the pitfalls of maintaining them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDelayed IUCN assessments are not unique to mammals and are viewed as a top priority for improving conservation outcomes globally.
“Unfortunately, delayed IUCN assessments are not unique to mammals and are viewed as a top priority for improving conservation outcomes globally (reviewed in Bachman et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bachman et al. 2019 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningConservation priorities sometimes guide taxonomic practices rather than vice versa, leading either to splitting species into multiple smaller units or lumping species to conserve those same units as subspecies or ESUs.
“As a result, conservation priorities sometimes guide taxonomic practices rather than vice versa, leading either to the splitting of species into multiple smaller units or the lumping of species to conserve those same units as subspecies or ESUs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMost often these units are species (but specimens or individuals are also commonly used).
“Most often these units are species (but specimens or individuals are also commonly used).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDoing so improves the rigor of a wide range of studies in conservation, biodiversity, and biomedical sciences that rely on accurate taxonomy, facilitating work that might otherwise go undone.
“Doing so improves the rigor of a wide range of studies in conservation, biodiversity, and biomedical sciences that rely on accurate taxonomy, facilitating work that might otherwise go undone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe value of species-centric taxonomic databases like the MDD grows in proportion to the number of disparate sources of biodiversity knowledge that they can effectively integrate while maintaining coherency.
“The value of species-centric taxonomic databases like the MDD grows in proportion to the number of disparate sources of biodiversity knowledge that they can effectively integrate while maintaining coherency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAlthough some conservation organizations recognize subspecies and other infraspecific conservation units, the species rank has remained the primary "currency of conservation" in various mammal clades.
“However, others have pointed out that although some conservation organizations recognize subspecies and other infraspecific conservation units (e.g., the IUCN, NatureServe), the species rank has remained the primary “currency of conservation” in various mammal clades (Rylands and Mittermeier 2014; Gippoliti et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGreater MDD-to-IUCN integration carries potential for speeding up assessment processes and improving outcomes in mammal conservation.
“Thus, greater MDD-to-IUCN integration carries potential for speeding up assessment processes and improving outcomes in mammal conservation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningContinuously curated data on the MDD presents an excellent opportunity for greater cross-linking among various databases that contain mammal biodiversity information.
“Continuously curated data on the MDD now presents an excellent opportunity for greater cross-linking among various databases that contain mammal biodiversity information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFinite resources available for conservation and incompleteness of global biodiversity assessments have provided obstacles to protecting all units along the population-to-species continuum.
“Ideally, all units along the population-to-species continuum would receive some conservation protections regardless of rank, but the finite resources available for conservation and incompleteness of global biodiversity assessments have provided obstacles (Gippoliti and Amori 2007; Coates et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gippoliti and Amori 2007
- cites Coates et al. 2018 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGlobal South countries are developing in-country biodiversity research capacity and infrastructure, addressing explicit goals for bridging the Linnaean and Wallacean shortfalls.
“Global South countries are developing in-country biodiversity research capacity and infrastructure, addressing explicit goals for bridging the Linnaean and Wallacean shortfalls (Klopper et al. 2002; Prathapan and Rajan 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn mammals, eponymous common names are unregulated by any governing body, unlike birds.
“However, in mammals at least, eponymous common names would be much easier to begin changing given that they are unregulated by any governing body (in contrast to birds; Winker 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Winker 2024 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThere is potential for much closer integration of MDD efforts with downstream biodiversity resources like the IUCN Red List.
“However, there is potential for much closer integration of MDD efforts with downstream biodiversity resources like the IUCN Red List.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningLinking MDD2 metadata to broader biodiversity infrastructure supports more robust and integrative approaches to mammalian taxonomy and conservation planning than would otherwise be possible.
“By ensuring that these metadata are linked to broader biodiversity infrastructure, the MDD supports more robust and integrative approaches to mammalian taxonomy and conservation planning than would otherwise be possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningMDD2 highlights critical remaining knowledge gaps.
“MDD2 provides a comprehensive resource that not only lessens aspects of the Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls but also highlights critical remaining knowledge gaps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenMDD2 and future versions offer a platform for community curation of hard-to-access but fundamentally important data underpinning biodiversity knowledge of living and recently extinct mammals.
“In conclusion, MDD2 and future versions offer a platform for the community curation of often hard-to-access but fundamentally important data that underpins biodiversity knowledge of living and recently extinct mammals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe nomenclatural metadata in MDD2 provide researchers with the foundational tools needed to conduct taxonomic revisions, resolve nomenclatural conflicts, and refine species boundaries.
“The hard-won nomenclatural metadata included in MDD2 provide researchers with the foundational tools needed to conduct taxonomic revisions, resolve nomenclatural conflicts, and refine species boundaries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The past rate of mammal species recognition/description since 1980 will continue into the future.
“leading to projections of ∼7,079 species by 2030 and ∼8,376 by 2050 if these trends continue”
The paper relies on this without support.
The species totals from the 14 mammalian compendia are comparable and accurate enough to estimate a global rate of species recognition.
“at a rate of ∼65 species/yr based on past totals from 14 mammalian compendia”
The paper relies on this without support.
The total species counts from the compared compendia (other than IUCN) are representative of the number of recognized mammal species at their time.
“total species counts were extracted from each source (other than IUCN version totals, which are not representative of all recognized mammals at their time of versioning) and used to estimate the rate of new mammal species recognition from 1980 to 2024 using linear regression.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The observed trend in mammal species recognition from 1980 to 2024 will continue into the future.
“The equation generated for the linear regression line was then used to estimate total recognized mammal species by 2030, 2040, 2050, and 2100 if the observed trends were to continue.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Much of the information used to update the MDD is in rare archives, offline sources, or behind paywalls.
“Because much of the information used to update the MDD is in rare archives, offline sources, or behind paywalls, manual data curation by a dedicated team of students and volunteers has been crucial in collating these data and linking their contained biodiversity knowledge.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Google Analytics data accurately reflects the number of unique users and their locations.
“Over a recent 17-mo period, it was visited by 1,200 to 2,900 users/mo for a total of 25,991 unique users that were located in 170 different countries (Google Analytics: 19 May 2023 to 19 October 2024).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The historical estimates of mammal species richness from different sources are comparable enough to track trends.
“Estimates of total mammal species richness continued to decrease before reaching a low in 1980 when Corbet and Hill listed 4,005 recent mammal species (C&H1), being the first known publication since the peak of mammalian descriptive taxonomy to include a complete list of every then-recognized valid mammal species.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Observed trends in historical species descriptions or species recognition will continue into the future.
“if observed trends in historical species descriptions were to continue”
“If this trend continues”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Table 1 gives a different MDD2 species total
MinorTable 1 lists 6,753 MDD2 species, while Table 2 and the Results give 6,759. Table 1's own breakdown-6,629 wild extant, 113 recently extinct, and 17 domestic-also totals 6,759.
“| Species | 4,809 | 5,115 | 5,416 | 5,489 | 6,495 | 6,554 | 5,983 | 6,753 |”
“MDD2 catalogs the taxonomy and distribution of 6,759 valid mammal species (6,629 wild extant; 113 extinct; 17 domestic)”
Two different projections are given for the same trend
MinorThe Results project approximately 7,079 species in 2030 and 8,376 in 2050, whereas the Discussion gives 7,084 and 8,382 for the same compendia-based trend. The regression equation printed in the Results supports the first pair.
“there would be ∼7,079 species by 2030, ∼7,727 by 2040, ∼8,376 by 2050, and ∼11,619 by 2100.”
“If this trend continues, we estimate that the total recognized mammal species richness will increase to ∼7,084 species by 2030 and ∼8,382 species by 2050.”
Cites
Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., et al. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:teotwa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 8,488 · see citing works
Darwin, C. R., Murray, J. J., Sons, W. C. A., & Evans., B. &. (1859) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.82303 · Cited by 5,610 · see citing works
Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference
Schmid, R., Wilson, D. E., & Reeder, D. M. (1993) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1223169 · Cited by 5,384 · see citing works
Nowak, R. (2018) · doi:10.1353/book.59141 · Cited by 4,102 · see citing works
Nowak, R. (1999) · doi:10.56021/9780801857898 · Cited by 4,102
Hennig, W. (1965) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.10.010165.000525 · Cited by 4,086 · see citing works
Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-1281 · Cited by 2,996 · see citing works
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., & Dirzo, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1704949114 · Cited by 2,663 · see citing works
NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools
Schoch, C. L., Ciufo, S., Domrachev, M., Hotton, C. L., Kannan, S., Khovanskaya, R., Leipe, D., Mcveigh, R., O’Neill, K., Robbertse, B., et al. (2020) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baaa062 · Cited by 2,635 · see citing works
The principles of classification and a classification of mammals
Simpson, G. G. (1945) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18028696 · Cited by 2,529 · see citing works
Endless Forms: Species and Speciation
Howard, D. J., & Berlocher, S. H. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,516 · see citing works
Classification of mammals: above the species level
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5657 · Cited by 2,103 · see citing works
DAYRAT, B. (2005) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.x · Cited by 2,007 · see citing works
The integrative future of taxonomy
Padial, J. M., Miralles, A., la Riva, I. D., & Miguel Vences, B. (2010) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-7-16 · Cited by 1,939 · see citing works
Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity
Hortal, J., de Bello, F., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Lewinsohn, T. M., Lobo, J. M., & Ladle, R. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400 · Cited by 1,743 · see citing works
Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis
Cracraft, J. L. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6781-3_6 · Cited by 1,544 · see citing works
The Status of the World's Land and Marine Mammals: Diversity, Threat, and Knowledge
Schipper, J., Chanson, J. S., Chiozza, F., Cox, N. A., Hoffmann, M., Katariya, V., Lamoreux, J., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Stuart, S. N., Temple, H. J., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165115 · Cited by 1,534 · see citing works
The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals
Hall, E. R., & Simpson, G. G. (1946) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1375443 · Cited by 1,528 · see citing works
How many species of mammals are there?
Burgin, C. J., Colella, J. P., Kahn, P. L., & Upham, N. S. (2018) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyx147 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantitative criteria for species delimitation
TOBIAS, J. A., SEDDON, N., SPOTTISWOODE, C. N., PILGRIM, J. D., FISHPOOL, L. D. C., & COLLAR, N. J. (2010) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2010.01051.x · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works
International code of zoological nomenclature = Code international de nomenclature zoologique
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, Ride, W. D. L., International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature., & Sciences., I. U. O. B. (1999) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.50608 · Cited by 1,042 · see citing works
The role of taxonomy in species conservation
Mace, G. M. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1454 · Cited by 955 · see citing works
Woinarski, J. C. Z., Burbidge, A. A., & Harrison, P. L. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1417301112 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Darwin, C. R. (1888) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_303511 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Handbook of the Mammals of the World
Zukal, J. (2020) · Journal of Vertebrate Biology · doi:10.25225/jvb.e2003 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Delimiting species: a Renaissance issue in systematic biology
Sites, J. W., & Marshall, J. C. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00184-8 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation
Hurlbert, A. H., & Jetz, W. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704469104 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals 1758 to 1946
Burt, W. H., Ellerman, J. R., & Morrison‐Scott, T. C. S. (1952) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1375778 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Govaerts, R., Lughadha, E. N., Black, N., et al. (2021) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00997-6 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
A world list of mammalian species
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-1259 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Hinde, R. A. (1968) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(68)90029-8 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
The Near Eastern Origin of Cat Domestication
Driscoll, C. A., Menotti-Raymond, M., Roca, A. L., Hupe, K., Johnson, W. E., Geffen, E., Harley, E. H., Delibes, M., Pontier, D., Kitchener, A. C., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139518 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept
Fišer, C., Robinson, C. T., & Malard, F. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14486 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Systematics and the Origin of Species
Davis, W. B., & Mayr, E. W. (1943) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1374810 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
de Queiroz, K., & Gauthier, J. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002313 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Shedding Light on the Dark Data in the Long Tail of Science
Heidorn, P. B. (2008) · Library trends · doi:10.1353/lib.0.0036 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Coates, D. J., Byrne, M., & Moritz, C. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00165 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Groves, C. (2011) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9781421400938 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
The Promise of Comparative Genomics in Mammals
O’Brien, S. J., Menotti-Raymond, M. A., Murphy, W. J., Nash, W. G., Wienberg, J., Stanyon, R., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Womack, J. E., & Graves, J. A. M. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.458 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Land use-induced spillover: a call to action to safeguard environmental, animal, and human health
Plowright, R. K., Reaser, J. K., Locke, H., Woodley, S. J., Patz, J. A., Becker, D. J., Oppler, G., Hudson, P. J., & Tabor, G. M. (2021) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00031-0 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Marine mammals as ecosystem sentinels
Moore, S. E. (2008) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/07-mamm-s-312r1.1 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
How to describe a cryptic species? Practical challenges of molecular taxonomy
Jörger, K. M., & Schrödl, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-10-59 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Data integration enables global biodiversity synthesis
Heberling, J. M., Miller, J. T., Noesgaard, D., Weingart, S. B., & Schigel, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2018093118 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Implications of different species concepts for conserving biodiversity
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., Dudash, M. R., Eldridge, M. D. B., Fenster, C. B., Lacy, R. C., MENDELSON, J. R. I., Porton, I. J., Ralls, K., & Ryder, O. A. (2012) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.034 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Orders and Families of Recent Mammals of the World.
Genoways, H. H., Schlitter, D. A., Anderson, S., & Jones, J. K. (1985) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2413336 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Genetics and the Origin of Species
S., F. W. (1938) · Nature · doi:10.1038/141310a0 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Mining museums for historical DNA: advances and challenges in museomics
Raxworthy, C. J., & Smith, B. T. (2021) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.009 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Cecco, G. J. D., Barve, V., Belitz, M., Stucky, B. J., Guralnick, R., & Hurlbert, A. (2021) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biab093 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Arrangement of the families of mammals. With analytical tables
Gill, T. (2010) · Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18028457 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Taxonomy anarchy hampers conservation
Garnett, S. T., & Christidis, L. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/546025a · Cited by 299 · see citing works
DNA barcoding and the renaissance of taxonomy
Miller, S. E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0700466104 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Database, M. D. (2025) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17033774 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Conserving intraspecific variation for nature’s contributions to people
Des Roches, S., Pendleton, L. H., Shapiro, B., & Palkovacs, E. P. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01403-5 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Mammal species of the world. A taxonomic and geographic reference
Honacki, J. H., Kinman, K. E., & Koeppl, J. (1982) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3873243 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Lendemer, J. C., Thiers, B. M., Monfils, A., Zaspel, J. M., Ellwood, E. R., Bentley, A. C., LeVan, K. E., Bates, J. M., Jennings, D., Contreras, D. L., et al. (2019) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biz140 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Taxonomy: renaissance or Tower of Babel?
Mallet, J., & Willmott, K. R. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)00061-7 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Zachos, F. E., Apollonio, M., Bärmann, E. V., Festa‐Bianchet, M., Göhlich, U. B., Habel, J. C., Haring, E., Kruckenhauser, L., Lovari, S., McDevitt, A. D., et al. (2012) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2012.07.083 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
The naming of wild animal species and their domestic derivatives
Gentry, A., Clutton-Brock, J., & Groves, C. P. (2004) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2003.10.006 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Proposed Amendments to the Constitution of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
Secretariat, I. C. Z. N. (2020) · ZooKeys · doi:10.3897/zookeys.931.51583 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Bakker, F. T., Antonelli, A., Clarke, J. A., Cook, J. A., Edwards, S. V., Ericson, P. G. P., Faurby, S., Ferrand, N., Gelang, M., Gillespie, R. G., et al. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.8225 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
List of North American Recent Mammals
Miller, G. S., & Kellogg, R. (1955) · Bulletin of the United States National Museum · doi:10.5479/si.03629236.205 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Global correlates of range contractions and expansions in terrestrial mammals
Pacifici, M., Rondinini, C., Rhodes, J. R., Burbidge, A. A., Cristiano, A., Watson, J. E. M., Woinarski, J. C. Z., & Di Marco, M. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16684-w · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Shortfalls and opportunities in terrestrial vertebrate species discovery
Moura, M. R., & Jetz, W. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01411-5 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Progress, challenges and opportunities for Red Listing
Bachman, S. P., Field, R., Reader, T., Raimondo, D., Donaldson, J., Schatz, G. E., & Lughadha, E. N. (2019) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.002 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference
Solari, S., & Baker, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/06-mamm-r-422.1 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Handbook of the Mammals of the World
Nel, J. A. J. (2015) · African Zoology · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Borsch, T., Berendsohn, W. G., Dalcin, E., et al. (2020) · Taxon · doi:10.1002/tax.12373 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Taxonomy of Australian Mammals
Jackson, S., & Groves, C. P. (2015) · CSIRO Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1071/9781486300136 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Species delimitation 4.0: integrative taxonomy meets artificial intelligence
Karbstein, K., Kösters, L. M., Hodač, L., Hofmann, M. R., Hörandl, E., Tomasello, S., Wagner, N. D., Emerson, B. C., Albach, D. C., Scheu, S., et al. (2024) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.11.002 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
How many named species are valid?
Alroy, J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.062691099 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Li, G., Figueiró, H. V., Eduardo Eizirik, C., & Murphy, W. J. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz139 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Card, D. C., Shapiro, B., Giribet, G., Moritz, C., & Edwards, S. V. (2021) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-071719-020506 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Expert range maps of global mammal distributions harmonised to three taxonomic authorities
Marsh, C. J., Sica, Y. V., Burgin, C. J., Dorman, W. A., Anderson, R. C., del Toro Mijares, I., Vigneron, J. G., Barve, V., Dombrowik, V. L., Duong, M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14330 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationA decade of pig genome sequencing: a window on pig domestication and evolution
Groenen, M. A. M. (2016) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0204-2 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments
Cazalis, V., Marco, M. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Akçakaya, H. R., González‐Suárez, M., Meyer, C., Clausnitzer, V., Böhm, M., Zizka, A., Cardoso, P., et al. (2022) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.12.002 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Ancient Mitogenomes Reveal the Evolutionary History and Biogeography of Sloths
Delsuc, F., Kuch, M., Gibb, G. C., Karpinski, E., Hackenberger, D., Szpak, P., Martínez, J. G., Mead, J. I., McDonald, H. G., MacPhee, R. D. E., et al. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.043 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Die Saugthiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur, mit Beschreibungen
Schreber, J. C. D., Goldfuss, G. A., & Wagner, J. A. (1774) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.67399 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Jenkins, P. D., Kilpatrick, C. W., Robinson, M. F., & Timmins, R. J. (2005) · Systematics and Biodiversity · doi:10.1017/s1477200004001549 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Global trends and biases in new mammal species discoveries
Reeder, D. M., Helgen, K. M., & Wilson, D. E. (2007) · Occasional papers · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.156951 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Nomenclature and placental mammal phylogeny
Asher, R. J., & Helgen, K. M. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-102 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
The “Evolutionarily Significant Unit” concept and its applicability in biological conservation
Casacci, L. P., Barbero, F., & Balletto, E. (2013) · The European Zoological Journal · doi:10.1080/11250003.2013.870240 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
ZooBank: Developing a nomenclatural tool for unifying 250 years of biological information
Pyle, R. L., & Michel, E. (2008) · Zootaxa · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1950.1.6 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
A Checklist of African Mammals
Schwarz, E., & Allen, G. M. (1939) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1374272 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Population genetics from 1966 to 2016
Charlesworth, B., & Charlesworth, D. (2016) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2016.55 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Cryptic species conservation: a review
Hending, D. (2025) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.13139 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Acknowledging more biodiversity without more species
Dufresnes, C., Poyarkov, N. A., & Jablonski, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2302424120 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Anthropogenic Extinction Dominates Holocene Declines of West Indian Mammals
Cooke, S. B., Dávalos, L. M., Mychajliw, A. M., Turvey, S. T., & Upham, N. S. (2017) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022754 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationGalbreath, K. E., Hoberg, E. P., Cook, J. A., Armién, B., Bell, K. C., Campbell, M., Dunnum, J. L., Dursahinhan, A. T., Eckerlin, R. P., Gardner, S. L., et al. (2019) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyz048 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Empirical and philosophical problems with the subspecies rank
Burbrink, F. T., Crother, B. I., Murray, C. M., Smith, B. T., Ruane, S., Myers, E. A., & Pyron, R. A. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.9069 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Updated and annotated checklist of recent mammals from Brazil
Quintela, F. M., Rosa, C., & Feijó, A. (2020) · Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências · doi:10.1590/0001-3765202020191004 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Laonastes and the "Lazarus Effect" in Recent Mammals
Dawson, M. R., Marivaux, L., Li, C., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1124187 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Whole-genome analysis of giraffe supports four distinct species
Coimbra, R. T. F., Winter, S., Kumar, V., Koepfli, K.-P., Gooley, R. M., Dobrynin, P., Fennessy, J., & Janke, A. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.033 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Eponyms have no place in 21st-century biological nomenclature
Guedes, P., Alves‐Martins, F., Arribas, J. M., et al. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02022-y · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS)
Survey, U. S. G. (2013) · USGS DOI Tool Production Environment · doi:10.5066/f7kh0kbk · Cited by 98 · see citing works
A World List of Mammalian Species
Koopman, K. F., Corbet, G. B., & Hill, J. E. (1981) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1380617 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
What really hampers taxonomy and conservation? A riposte to Garnett and Christidis (2017)
RAPOSO, M. A., STOPIGLIA, R., BRITO, G. R. R., BOCKMANN, F. A., KIRWAN, G. M., GAYON, J., & DUBOIS, A. (2017) · Zootaxa · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4317.1.10 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Data justice and biodiversity conservation
Pritchard, R., Sauls, L. A., Oldekop, J. A., Kiwango, W. A., & Brockington, D. (2022) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13919 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
The pygmy right whale Caperea marginata : the last of the cetotheres
Fordyce, R. E., & Marx, F. G. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2645 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Baird, A. B., Braun, J. K., Mares, M. A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyv135 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Repositories for Taxonomic Data: Where We Are and What is Missing
Miralles, A., Bruy, T., Wolcott, K., Scherz, M. D., Begerow, D., Beszteri, B., Bonkowski, M., Felden, J., Gemeinholzer, B., Glaw, F., et al. (2020) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syaa026 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Cook, J. A., Arai, S., Armién, B., et al. (2020) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa064 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
A Synopsis of Distribution Patterns and the Conservation of Mammal Species
Cole, F. R., Reeder, D. M., & Wilson, D. E. (1994) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1382545 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
A paradigm shift in our view of species drives current trends in biological classification
Padial, J. M., & De la Riva, I. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12676 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Manuel de mammalogie, ou histoire naturelle des mammiferes
Lesson, R. P. (1827) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.137811 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Patterns and trends in the discovery of new Neotropical mammals
Patterson, B. D. (2000) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00080.x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Middle‐out ecology: small carnivores as sentinels of global change
Marneweck, C. J., Allen, B. L., Butler, A. R., Do Linh San, E., Harris, S. N., Jensen, A. J., Saldo, E. A., Somers, M. J., Titus, K., Muthersbaugh, M., et al. (2022) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/mam.12300 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach
Agosti, D., & Egloff, W. (2009) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/1756-0500-2-53 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Dark extinction: the problem of unknown historical extinctions
Boehm, M. M. A., & Cronk, Q. C. B. (2021) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2021.0007 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Global shortfalls in documented actions to conserve biodiversity
Senior, R. A., Bagwyn, R., Leng, D., Killion, A. K., Jetz, W., & Wilcove, D. S. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07498-7 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
The Dogma of Dingoes—Taxonomic status of the dingo: A reply to Smith et al.
Jackson, S., Fleming, P. J. S., Eldridge, M. D. B., Ingleby, S., Flannery, T., Johnson, R. N., Cooper, S. J., Mitchell, K. J., Souilmi, Y., Cooper, A., et al. (2019) · Zootaxa · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.7 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
(New) Species concepts, species delimitation and the inherent limitations of taxonomy
Zachos, F. E. (2018) · Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1007/s12041-018-0965-1 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Next‐generation species delimitation and taxonomy: Implications for biogeography
Miguel Vences, B., Miralles, A., & Dufresnes, C. (2024) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14807 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Primate taxonomy: Species and conservation
Rylands, A. B., & Mittermeier, R. A. (2014) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.21387 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
D’Elía, G., Hurtado, N., & D’Anatro, A. (2016) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyw068 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Limited introgression supports division of giraffe into four species
Winter, S., Fennessy, J., & Janke, A. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4490 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Gippoliti, S., Cotterill, F. P. D., Zinner, D., & Groves, C. P. (2018) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12335 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Mammals and meaningful taxonomic units: the debate about species concepts and conservation
Zachos, F. E. (2018) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/mam.12121 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Illustrated Checklist of the Mammals of the World
D’Elía, G., & Teta, P. (2021) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyab075 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Genomic analysis reveals a cryptic pangolin species
Gu, T.-T., Wu, H., Yang, F., Gaubert, P., Heighton, S. P., Fu, Y., Liu, K., Luo, S., Zhang, H., Hu, J., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2304096120 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Merriam, C. H. (1918) · North American Fauna · doi:10.3996/nafa.41.0001 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Species definitions and conservation: a review and case studies from African mammals
Groves, C. P., Cotterill, F. P. D., Gippoliti, S., Robovský, J., Roos, C., Taylor, P. J., & Zinner, D. P. (2017) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-017-0976-0 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Renaming taxa on ethical grounds threatens nomenclatural stability and scientific communication
Ceríaco, L. M. P., Aescht, E., Ahyong, S. T., et al. (2023) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac107 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Recent Mammals of the World: A Synopsis of Families
Southern, H. N., Anderson, S., & Jones, J. K. (1968) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/2970 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Petzold, A., & Hassanin, A. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217956 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Catalogus mammalium tam viventium quam fossilium. Quinquennale supplementum anno 1904
Trouessart, E.-L. (1904) · R. Friedländer & Sohn, eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.61820 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Mammals of the world: a checklist
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-2811 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
To increase trust, change the social design behind aggregated biodiversity data
Franz, N. M., & Sterner, B. W. (2018) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/bax100 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
XVI. A New Systematic Arrangement of Vertebrated Animals.
Bonaparte, C. L. (1840) · Transactions of the Linnean Society of London · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1838.tb00177.x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Mammal collections of the Western Hemisphere: a survey and directory of collections
Dunnum, J. L., McLean, B. S., Dowler, R. C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyy151 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Raposo, M. A., Kirwan, G. M., Lourenço, A. C. C., Sobral, G., Bockmann, F. A., & Stopiglia, R. (2020) · Systematics and Biodiversity · doi:10.1080/14772000.2020.1829157 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Wüster, W., THOMSON, S. A., O’Shea, M., & Kaiser, H. (2021) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blab009 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
(2007) · Folia Zoologica · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Biological Collections : Ensuring Critical Research and Education for the 21st Century
Contributions, F., Them, O. F. S., & Earth, D. O. (2021) · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Analysis of biodiversity data suggests that mammal species are hidden in predictable places
Parsons, D. J., Pelletier, T. A., Wieringa, J. G., Duckett, D. J., & Carstens, B. C. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2103400119 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Biodiversity, Taxonomic Infrastructure, International Collaboration, and New Species Discovery
Grieneisen, M. L., Zhan, Y., Potter, D., & Zhang, M. (2014) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biu035 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Baird, A. B., Braun, J. K., Engstrom, M. D., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186085 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Evidence that Myotis lucifugus “Subspecies” are Five Nonsister Species, Despite Gene Flow
Morales, A. E., & Carstens, B. C. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy010 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Vandepitte, L., Vanhoorne, B., Decock, W., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194599 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Primate Taxonomy: Inflation or Real?
Groves, C. P. (2014) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030232 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Zachos, F. E. (2014) · Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research · doi:10.1111/jzs.12088 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The mammals: a guide to the living species
A.N.W (1965) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(65)90145-4 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Thiele, K. R., Conix, S., Pyle, R. L., et al. (2021) · Organisms Diversity & Evolution · doi:10.1007/s13127-021-00495-y · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Patton, J. L., & Conroy, C. J. (2017) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyx074 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
T4Seeker: a hybrid model for type IV secretion effectors identification.
Li, J., He, S., Zhang, J., et al. (2024) · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s12915-024-02064-z · Cited by 43 · see citing works
(2013) · Bollettino del CILEA (CILEA) · doi:10.4404/hystrix-24.1-8849 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Cook, J. A., Greiman, S. E., Agosta, S. J., et al. (2016) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biw123 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The emerging role of mammal collections in 21st century mammalogy
Cook, J. A., & Light, J. E. (2018) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyy148 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Monotypic status of the South American relictual marsupial Dromiciops gliroides (Microbiotheria)
Suárez-Villota, E. Y., Quercia, C. A., Núñez, J. J., Gallardo, M. H., Himes, C. M. T., & Kenagy, G. J. (2018) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyy073 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Benham, P. M., & Bowie, R. C. K. (2023) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esac066 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Systematics and Taxonomy of Tonatia saurophila Koopman & Williams, 1951 (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae)
Basantes, M., Tinoco, N., Velazco, P. M., et al. (2020) · ZooKeys · doi:10.3897/zookeys.915.46995 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Foraminifera in the World Register of Marine Species (Worms) Taxonomic Database
Hayward, B. W., Coze, F. L., Vandepitte, L., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Foraminiferal Research · doi:10.2113/gsjfr.50.3.291 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Hybrid sterility genes in mice (Mus musculus): a peculiar case of PRDM9 incompatibility
Forejt, J., Jansa, P., & Parvanov, E. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.06.008 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Martin, G. M. (2017) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyx175 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Integrative taxonomy clarifies the evolution of a cryptic primate clade
van Elst, T., Sgarlata, G. M., Schüßler, D., Tiley, G. P., Poelstra, J. W., Scheumann, M., Blanco, M. B., Aleixo-Pais, I. G., Rina Evasoa, M., Ganzhorn, J. U., et al. (2024) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02547-w · Cited by 37 · see citing works
A Link No Longer Missing: New Evidence for the Cetotheriid Affinities of Caperea
Marx, F. G., & Fordyce, R. E. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164059 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Avian influenza spillover into mammals
Venkatesan, P. (2023) · The Lancet Microbe · doi:10.1016/s2666-5247(23)00173-8 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ziegler, A., Howarth, F., & Simmons, N. (2016) · American Museum Novitates · doi:10.1206/3854.1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Valladares-Gómez, A., Celis-Diez, J. L., Palma, R. E., & Manríquez, G. (2017) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2017.07.003 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Barthe, M., Rancilhac, L., Arteaga, M. C., et al. (2024) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syae027 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Weber, N., Nagy, M., Markotter, W., Schaer, J., Puechmaille, S. J., Sutton, J., Dávalos, L. M., Dusabe, M., Ejotre, I., Fenton, M. B., et al. (2023) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2023.0358 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Foley, N. M., Harris, A. J., Bredemeyer, K. R., Ruedi, M., Puechmaille, S. J., Teeling, E. C., Criscitiello, M. F., & Murphy, W. J. (2024) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100482 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Mohammed, R. S., Turner, G., Fowler, K., Pateman, M., Nieves-Colón, M. A., Fanovich, L., Cooke, S. B., Dávalos, L. M., Fitzpatrick, S. M., Giovas, C. M., et al. (2022) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/720154 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Three reciprocally monophyletic mtDNA lineages elucidate the taxonomic status of Grant’s gazelles
Lorenzen, E. D., Arctander, P., & Siegismund, H. R. (2008) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-007-9375-2 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
How taxonomic change influences forecasts of the Linnean shortfall (and what we can do about it)?
Lessa, T., Stropp, J., Hortal, J., & Ladle, R. J. (2024) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14829 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
基于遗传单系与鉴别特征的系统发生种的划分及其对哺乳动物分类学的意义
E. Gutiérrez, E., E. Gutiérrez, E., S. T. Garbino, G., & S. T. Garbino, G. (2018) · 动物学研究 · doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.037 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Liberating host–virus knowledge from biological dark data
Upham, N. S., Poelen, J. H., Paul, D., Groom, Q. J., Simmons, N. B., Vanhove, M. P. M., Bertolino, S., Reeder, D. M., Bastos-Silveira, C., Sen, A., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00196-0 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationMammal taxonomy without taxonomists: a reply to Zachos and Lovari
Gippoliti, S., Cotterill, F. P. D., & Groves, C. P. (2013) · Bollettino del CILEA (CILEA) · doi:10.4404/hystrix-24.1-8881 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The usage of subgenera in mammalian taxonomy
Teta, P. (2018) · Mammalia · doi:10.1515/mammalia-2018-0059 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Cahill, A. E., Meglécz, E., & Chenuil, A. (2024) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.13034 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The Global Taxonomy Initiative in Africa
Klopper, R. R., Smith, G. F., & Chikuni, A. C. (2002) · TAXON · doi:10.2307/1554974 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Novaes, R. L. M., Garbino, G. S. T., CLÁUDIO, V. C., et al. (2018) · Zootaxa · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4379.3.8 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Decentralized but Globally Coordinated Biodiversity Data
Sterner, B., Gilbert, E., & Franz, N. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.519133 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Taxonomy of the Dingo: It’s an ancient dog
Jackson, S., Fleming, P. J. S., Eldridge, M. D. B., et al. (2020) · Australian Zoologist · doi:10.7882/az.2020.049 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Colella, J. P., Frederick, L. M., Talbot, S. L., & Cook, J. A. (2021) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.13234 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Monadjem, A., Montauban, C., Webala, P. W., Laverty, T. M., Bakwo-Fils, E. M., Torrent, L., Tanshi, I., Kane, A., Rutrough, A. L., Waldien, D. L., et al. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-04170-7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ball, L., Rodríguez-Machado, S., Paredes-Burneo, D., Rutledge, S., Rutledge, S., Pluym, D. V., Babb-Biernacki, S. J., Chipps, A. S., Öztürk, R. Ç., Terzi̇, Y., et al. (2025) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.18511 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Global inequity in scientific names and who they honorPreprint
DuBay, S. G., Droguett, D. H. P., & Piland, N. C. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.09.243238 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Oates, J. F., Woodman, N., Gaubert, P., Sargis, E. J., Wiafe, E. D., Lecompte, É., Dowsett‐Lemaire, F., Dowsett, R. J., Bi, S., Ikemeh, R. A., et al. (2021) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab029 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ventura, K., Silva, M. J. D. J., Geise, L., et al. (2013) · Zoological studies · doi:10.1186/1810-522x-52-55 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
THOMSON, V., WIEWEL, A., CHINEN, A., MARYANTO, I., SINAGA, M. H., HOW, R., APLIN, K., & SUZUKI, H. (2018) · Zootaxa · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4459.3.2 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Mammalian species and the twofold nature of taxonomy: a comment on Taylor et al. 2019
Zachos, F. E., Christidis, L., & Garnett, S. T. (2019) · Mammalia · doi:10.1515/mammalia-2019-0009 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Baird, A. B., Braun, J. K., Engstrom, M. D., et al. (2021) · Therya · doi:10.12933/therya-21-1117 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Species Delimitation Using Molecular Data
Smith, M. L., & Carstens, B. C. (2022) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780367855604-9 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Publication practice in Taxonomy: Global inequalities and potential bias against negative results
Salvador, R. B., Cavallari, D. C., Rands, D., & Tomotani, B. M. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0269246 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Usinger, R. L. (1962) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/8.4.207c · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Catalogo de los Mamiferos de America del Sur. I. (Metatheria-Unguiculata-Carnivora)
Handley, C. O., & Cabrera, Á. (1959) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1376134 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Teta, P., & Díaz‐Nieto, J. F. (2019) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2019.04.004 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Whom Do Primate Names Honor? Rethinking Primate Eponyms
Chen‐Kraus, C., Farmer, C., Guevara, E. E., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-021-00252-0 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Genomic diversity and demographic history of the Dromiciops genus (Marsupialia: Microbiotheriidae)
Quintero‐Galvis, J. F., Saenz‐Agudelo, P., Amico, G. C., Vazquez, S., Shafer, A. B. A., & Nespolo, R. F. (2022) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107405 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Heads up–Four Giraffa species have distinct cranial morphology
Kargopoulos, N., Marugán‐Lobón, J., Chinsamy, A., Agwanda, B. R., Brown, M. B., Fennessy, S., Ferguson, S. D., Hoffman, R., Lala, F., Muneza, A., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315043 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Taylor, P. J., Denys, C., & Cotterill, F. P. D. (2019) · Mammalia · doi:10.1515/mammalia-2018-0031 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Mammal assemblage composition predicts global patterns in emerging infectious disease risk
Wang, Y., Matson, K. D., Santini, L., Visconti, P., Hilbers, J. P., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Xu, Y., Prins, H. H. T., Allen, T., Huang, Z. Y. X., et al. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15784 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Performance of a points-based scoring system for assessing species limits in birds
Tobias, J. A., Donald, P. F., Martin, R. W., et al. (2021) · The Auk · doi:10.1093/ornithology/ukab016 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Lausen, C. L., Proctor, M., Nagorsen, D. W., Burles, D., Paetkau, D., Harmston, E., Blejwas, K., Govindarajulu, P., & Friis, L. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2018-0113 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Advancing Taxonomy in the Global South and completing the Grand Linnaean Enterprise
PRATHAPAN, K. D., & RAJAN, P. D. (2020) · Megataxa · doi:10.11646/megataxa.1.1.15 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Digital accessible knowledge: Mobilizing legacy data and the future of taxonomic publishing
Fawcett, S., Agosti, D., Cole, S. R., & Wright, D. F. (2022) · Bulletin of the Society of Systematic Biologists · doi:10.18061/bssb.v1i1.8296 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Corrigendum: How many species of mammals are there?
(2019) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyz052 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Advancing the central role of non-model biorepositories in predictive modeling of emerging pathogens
Colella, J. P., Cobos, M. E., Salinas, I., et al. (2023) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011410 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Taxonomic inflation as a conservation trap for inbred populations
Clavero, M., Naves, J., Lucena-Pérez, M., et al. (2024) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.13677 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A memoir and bibliography of Michael Rogers Oldfield Thomas, F.R.S
Hill, J. E. (1990) · Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Historical Series · doi:10.5962/p.34698 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Borisenko, 2001, Types of vertebrates in the zoological museum of moscow university
- Cabrera, 1961, Catálogo de los mamíferos de America del Sur, Revista Del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” e Institutio Nacional de Investigación de Las Ciencias Naturales, 4, 309
- Corbet, 1986, A world list of mammalian species
- Cracraft, 1983, Current Ornithology, 159
- Cuvier, 1797, Tableau élémentaire de l’histoire naturelle des animaux
- Dalapicolla, 2020, Species concepts and taxonomic practice in the integrative taxonomy era: an example using South American rodents, Boletim Da Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia, 88, 36
- de Blainville, 1816, Prodrome d’une nouvelle distribution systématique du règne animal, 113
- de Blainville, 1864, Ostéographie ou description iconographique comparée du squelette et du système dentaire des mammifères recents et fossiles pour servir de la base à la zoologie et à la géologie
- Di Cecco, 2021, Observing the observers: how participants contribute data to iNaturalist and implications for biodiversity science, BioScience, 71, 1179
- Erxleben, 1777, Systema regni animalis per classes, ordines, genera, species, varietates cum synonymia et historia animalium. Classis I. Mammalia
- Fitzinger, 1867, Versuch einer natürlichen Anordnung der Nagethiere (Rodentia). (Schluss.), Sitzungsberichte Der Kaiserlichen Akademie Der Wissenschaften, 56, 57
- AL, 2008, Mammals of South america, volume 1: Marsupials, xenarthrans, shrews, and bats
- Gippoliti, 2012, “Taxonomic inflation” in the historical context of mammalogy and conservation, Hystrix, 23, 8
- Gippoliti, 2018, Impacts of taxonomic inertia for the conservation of African ungulate diversity: an overview, Biological Reviews, 93, 115
- Gmelin, 1788, Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima tertia, aucta, reformata
- Gray, 1821, On the natural arrangement of vertebrose animals, London Medical Repository, 15, 296
- Groves, 2001, Primate taxonomy
- Gutiérrez, 2018, Species delimitation based on diagnosis and monophyly, and its importance for advancing mammalian taxonomy, Zoological Research, 39, 301
- Hillis, 2020, The detection and naming of geographic variation within species, Herpe, 51, 52
- Huxley, 1881, On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata, and more particularly of the Mammalia, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1880, 649
- Kerr, 1792, The animal kingdom, or zoological system of the celebrated sir charles linnaeus. Class I. Mammalia
- Lawrence, 1993, Catalog of recent mammal types in the American Museum of Natural History, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 217, 1
- Lesson, 1842, Nouveau tableau du règne animal
- Linnaeus, 1758, Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata
- RA, 2013, Handbook of the mammals of the world
- Nowak, 1983, Walker’s mammals of the world
- Owen, 1868, On the anatomy of vertebrates
- Pallas, 1766, Miscellanea zoologica quibus novæ imprimis atque obscuræ animalium species describuntur et observationibus iconibusque illustrantur
- Pallas, 1767, Spicilegia zoologica. Fasciculus 1-12
- JL, 2015, Mammals of South america
- Siegismund, 2013, The mammals of Africa. VI. Pigs, hippopotamuses, chevrotain, giraffes, deer, and bovids, 373
- Smith, 2022, Species problems and beyond, 145
- Storer, 1943, General zoology
- Storer, 1951, General zoology. Second edition
- Trouessart, 1897, Catalogus mammalium tam viventium quam fossilium. Tomus I
- Trouessart, 1899, Catalogus mammalium tam viventium quam fossilium. Tomus II
- Uetz, 2016, The Reptile Database turns 20, Herpetological Review, 47, 330
- Uetz, 2021, A quarter century of reptile and amphibian databases, Herpetological Review, 52, 246
- Walker, 1964, Mammals of the world
- Walker, 1968, Mammals of the world
- Walker, 1975, Mammals of the world
- DE, 2016, Handbook of the mammals of the world
- DE, 2017, Handbook of the mammals of the world
- DE, 2009, Handbook of the mammals of the world
- DE, 2011, Handbook of the mammals of the world
- DE, 2014, Handbook of the mammals of the world
- DE, 2018, Handbook of the mammals of the world
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Burgin, C. J., Zijlstra, J. S., Becker, M. A., Handika, H., Alston, J. M., Widness, J., Liphardt, S., Huckaby, D. G., & Upham, N. S.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Hesperomys Project , Orinda, CA 94563,
- Smithsonian Institution (US)
- Louisiana State University (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of Montana (US)
- California State University, Long Beach (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-09-14
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1082-1117
- ISSN
- 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1542
- PMC
- PMC12526941
- OpenAlex
- W4414346270
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 271
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 20.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Mammalogy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Society of Mammalogists
- National Science Foundation
- VertLife Terrestrial (DEB 1441737)
- National Institutes of Health (1R21AI164268, 1R35GM156919)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Keywords
- mammal diversity, mammal taxonomy, zoological nomenclature, geographic distribution, biogeographic realms, type specimens, species delimitation, Hesperomys, synonymy, mammals, bats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review