Cited by 410Wildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Hunting and the Likelihood of Extinction of Amazonian Mammals: Caza y Probabilidad de Extinción de Mamiferos Amazónicos

Bodmer, Richard E., Eisenberg, John F., Redford, Kent H.·1997·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Species inhabiting tropical forests are thought to be on the verge of mass extinction. Much work has focused on extinction rates caused by deforestation; however, many of the recorded extinctions that have occurred since 1600 were a result of overhunting. We collected data on the relative abundance of large‐bodied mammals in the northeastern Peruvian Amazon in areas with persistent hunting pressure and in areas with infrequent hunting pressure. We quantified the effects of hunting by calculating the change in abundance of species between the infrequently and persistently hunted sites. We report that in Amazonian mammals weighing more than 1 kg the degree of population declines caused by hunting is correlated with the species’ intrinsic rate of natural increase (r max ), longevity, and generation time. Our results show that species with long‐lived individuals, low rates of increase, and long generation times are more vulnerable to extinction than species with short‐lived individuals, high rates of increase, and shorter generations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96022.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some taxa appear highly vulnerable while others seem unaffected, and populations of a few taxa may even be enhanced by hunting, typically as a function of their ecological adaptability and population biology.

    “Some taxa appear highly vulnerable while others seem unaffected, and populations of a few taxa may even be enhanced by hunting (Bodmer et al. 1997, Cullen et al. 2000, Hurtado-Gonzales and Bodmer 2004, Isaac and Cowlishaw 2004, Salas and Kim 2002) -typically as a function of their ecological adaptability and population biology.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bodmer, R. E., Eisenberg, J. F., & Redford, K. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Florida Museum of Natural History (US)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
Corresponding author
Bodmer, Richard E.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-04-20
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
460-466
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W1582060607
Cited by
410
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 24
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundo Amazônia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
hunting, overhunting, extinction risk, Amazonian mammals, large mammals, population decline (ecology), relative abundance, intrinsic rate of increase, longevity, generation time, life-history traits, tropical forest conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review