Effects of Harvesting on Genetic Diversity in Old-Growth Eastern White Pine in Ontario, Canada. Efecto de la Cosecha Sobre la Diversidad Genetica de un Bosque Maduro de Pino Blanco del Este
Abstract
Genetic diversity measures at 54 isozyme loci coding for 16 enzymes in megagametophytes were compared between preharvest and postharvest gene pools of two adjacent virgin, old-growth (∼250 years) stands of eastern white pine ( Pinus strobus L.) in the Galloway Lake Old Pine Area of central Ontario. The concurrence of genetic diversity changes between the stands suggests that real and repeatable genetic erosion occurred in these gene pools as a result of harvesting. The total and mean number of alleles detected in each stand were reduced by approximately 25% after tree density reductions of 75%. The percentage of polymorphic loci dropped by about 33% from preharvest levels. About 40% of the low frequency (0.25> p ≥ 0.01) alleles and 80% of the rare ( p < 0.01) alleles were lost from each stand because of harvesting. Hypothetical multilocus gametic diversity was reduced by about 40% in each stand after harvesting. Latent genetic potential of each stand was reduced by about 50%, suggesting that the ability of these gene pools to adapt to changing environmental conditions may have been compromised. Heterozygosity estimates in the postharvest stands did not reflect reductions in allelic richness due to harvesting. Observed heterozygosity increased by 12% in one stand after harvesting, even though other genetic diversity measures decreased. Gene frequency changes due to harvesting imply that gene pools of naturally regenerated progeny stands may be quite different from the original…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Buchert et al. (1997) found that structural retention practices, which removed most of the trees capable of bearing seed, led to a major reduction in rare alleles in the seed produced by the residual trees.
“Buchert et al. (1997) found that these”
From Adapting forestry practices to address old-growth concerns in the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence forests of Ontario (2003) · cites this paper as Buchert et al. (1997)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pinto, F. (2003) · The Forestry Chronicle · doi:10.5558/tfc79613-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buchert, G. P., Rajora, O. P., Hood, J. V., & Dancik, B. P.
- Affiliations
- Ontario Forest Research Institute (CA)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Buchert, George P.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 747-758
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W1861471664
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- Pinus strobus, old-growth forest, genetic diversity, genetic erosion, harvest effects, isozyme loci, rare alleles, heterozygosity, gene pool, natural regeneration, silviculture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review