Adapting forestry practices to address old-growth concerns in the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence forests of Ontario
Open accessAbstract
The Great Lakes–St. Lawrence forest, particularly the eastern white and red pine forests around Temagami and Sault Ste. Marie, was the centre of controversy regarding the treatment of old-growth forests in Ontario in the 1980s and 1990s. Over the past two decades, changes in legislation, forest planning and stand prescriptions have been made in Ontario and practices at the forest and stand levels have also changed significantly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 31 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
High-grading practices reduce the abundance of stems of high value, such as large healthy trees.
“However, high-grading practices reduce the abundance of stems of high value, such as large healthy trees.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Corbett 1994 source
The Management section (page unavailable) says that better-quality trees are retained as residuals under Algonquin Park’s shelterwood system. Searches for high-grading and selective removal of large, valuable trees found no passage addressing whether high-grading reduces their abundance. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Over a 70-year period most of the large super-canopy white pines in Algonquin Provincial Park were logged.
“over a 70-year period most of the large super-canopy white pines in Algonquin Provincial Park were logged (Corbett 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Corbett 1994 source
- Premisereasoning
As a result, changes have been made to the shelterwood silvicultural system in Ontario.
“As a result, changes have been made to the shelterwood silvicultural system in Ontario (Pinto et al. 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pinto et al. 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Retention of cavity trees and downed woody debris provides habitat for many predators of the white pine weevil.
“retention of cavity trees and downed woody debris that provide habitat for many of the predators of the white pine weevil”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szuba and Pinto (1991)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
The application of practices that retain features similar to natural disturbances in the original forest have minimized some other management problems such as damage by white pine weevil.
“The application of practices that retain features similar to natural disturbances in the original forest (Fig. 6) have minimized some other management problems such as damage by white pine weevil (Pissoides strobi (Peck)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Premisecitation
When the results of conventional silvicultural practices are compared with the within-stand changes resulting from natural, stand-initiating disturbances, such as fire and wind, five major areas of difference are detected.
“When the results of conventional silvicultural practices (e.g., Smith et al. 1997) are compared with the within-stand changes resulting from natural, stand-initiating disturbances, such as fire and wind, five major areas of difference are detected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al. 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Application of even-aged management systems to ensure a continuous supply of timber may result in decreased abundance of stands over the rotation age.
“For example, the application of even-aged management systems to ensure a continuous supply of timber may result in decreased abundance of stands over the rotation age (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The composition of the residual live and dead stems after harvest is often very different than that of the composition left after a natural disturbance.
“Also, the composition of the residual live and dead stems after harvest is often very different than that of the composition left after a natural disturbance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Management planning in Ontario requires the definition of forest objectives that deal with biological diversity.
“Management planning in Ontario requires the definition of forest objectives that deal with biological diversity (OMNR 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OMNR 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
After natural disturbance, stands contain stems of live, dying, and dead trees.
“After natural disturbance, stands contain stems of live, dying, and dead trees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Comparisons with natural disturbances revealed that some trees survived into the new stand.
“Comparisons with natural disturbances revealed that some trees survived into the new stand.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Conventional shelterwood silvicultural systems result in the complete removal of the overstorey after two to four harvests.
“For example, conventional shelterwood silvicultural systems result in the complete removal of the overstorey after two to four harvests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
As trees often have life spans several times longer than the rotation age, the quantities of old trees and old stands are reduced.
“As trees often have life spans several times longer than the rotation age, the quantities of old trees and old stands are reduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
In some cases, such as the removal of tree stems or creation of road networks, there are no practical measures that can be applied to mimic nature.
“In some cases, such as the removal of tree stems or creation of road networks, there are no practical measures that can be applied to mimic nature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Buchert et al. (1997) found that structural retention practices, which removed most of the trees capable of bearing seed, led to a major reduction in rare alleles in the seed produced by the residual trees.
“Buchert et al. (1997) found that these”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buchert et al. (1997) source
- Premisecitation
In areas where old and often large eastern white and red pine once grew, such as in Temagami, we may now find poplar, white birch, and red maple.
“For example, in areas where old and often large eastern white and red pine once grew, such as in Temagami, we may now find poplar, white birch, and red maple (Dawson and Maure 1990).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dawson and Maure 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
After logging, stems that are cut are removed from the site.
“In contrast, after logging, stems that are cut are removed from the site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Retention of shade reduces the diameter of regenerating eastern white pine leaders, making them less suitable for and more difficult to find by the white pine weevil.
“retention of shade, which reduces the diameter of regenerating eastern white pine leaders, making them less suitable for and more difficult to find by the white pine weevil.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szuba and Pinto (1991)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
There are means to adapt the outcomes of forestry practices so that they more closely resemble natural disturbances.
“However, there are means to adapt the outcomes of forestry practices so that they more closely resemble natural disturbances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In areas where sustained-yield forestry is being practised, the amount of eastern white pine trees and stands older than the rotation age may be reduced.
“Therefore, in areas where sustained-yield forestry is being practised, the amount of eastern white pine trees and stands older than the rotation age may be reduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The rotation age of eastern white pine is currently 100 to 120 years, but these trees may live to be 400 to 700 years old.
- Interpretationcitation
To be consistent with Ontario's legislation, ecological sustainability must be addressed during the planning and implementation of forestry activities.
“To be consistent with Ontario's legislation, ecological sustainability must be addressed during the planning and implementation of forestry activities (OMNR 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OMNR 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Forestry operations may compact, rut, or erode soil in a manner that does not occur through natural processes.
“Forestry operations may compact, rut, or erode soil in a manner that does not occur through natural processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
In white pine cover types of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forests of Ontario, conventional logging makes poplar, birch, spruce, and balsam fir more likely to be left uncut.
“• Poplar, birch, spruce and balsam fir fir more likely to be left uncut more likely to be killed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Under the most recent land-use planning exercise, fully 12% of the province's Crown lands will be protected from logging.
“Under the most recent land-use planning exercise (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) 1999), fully 12% of the province's Crown lands will be protected from logging as suggested by the Brundtland Commission report (World Commission on Environment and Development 1987) and the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites OMNR 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites World Commission on Environment and Development 1987
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Retention of other live trees modifies the understorey microclimate, making it more suitable for invertebrate predators of the white pine weevil.
“retention of other live trees, which modifies the understorey microclimate, making it more suitable for invertebrate predators of the white pine weevil”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szuba and Pinto (1991)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Concerns about the loss or reduction of forests where natural processes are dominant have been documented in many forest management plans in Ontario.
“Concerns about the loss or reduction of forests where natural processes Boreal Forest Region Great Lakes St. Lawrence Forest Regions Deciduous Forest Region are dominant have been documented in many forest management plans in Ontario, for example: the Algoma Forest (Miller 2000), Temiskaming Forest (Fantin 2001), and Lake Nipigon Forest (Foresst 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Miller 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Fantin 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Foresst 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
In sugar maple, yellow birch, eastern hemlock, red maple, and balsam fir cover types of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forests of Ontario, low to moderate intensity wind, ice, insect, and disease events make moderate sized and rot-affected trees more likely to be killed.
“• Moderate sized and trees with • Trees with cull more rot more likely to be killed.likely to be left uncut.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In white pine cover types of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forests of Ontario, moderate to low intensity fire makes large white and red pine trees more likely to survive.
“• Large white and red pine trees • Large white and red pine poplar, white birch, spruce, more likely to survive (have more likely to be harvested due balsam fir thick bark, canopies high above to high economic value.ground fire, deep rooted)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Forests where the shelterwood silvicultural system is practised now retain many of the trees after the final removal cut that would have survived a natural disturbance.
“Forests where the shelterwood silvicultural system is practised now retain many of the trees after the final removal cut that would have survived a natural disturbance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Industrial logging of conifer stands in Ontario's forests has resulted in widespread regeneration of intolerant hardwoods, despite attempts to establish conifers.
“For instance, according to Hearndon et al. (1992) and Jackson et al. (2000), industrial logging of conifer stands in Ontario's forests has resulted in widespread regeneration of intolerant hardwoods, despite attempts to establish conifers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hearndon et al. (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Jackson et al. (2000) source
- Premisecitation
The Crown Forest Sustainability Act requires that forestry more closely emulate natural processes to ensure ecological sustainability is maintained.
“The Crown Forest Sustainability Act (Province of Ontario.(RSO) 1994) is one of the major regulatory controls on industrial forestry in Ontario.It requires that forestry more closely emulate natural processes to ensure ecological sustainability is maintained.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Province of Ontario.(RSO) 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Many forestry operations have no natural counterpart.
“Many forestry operations have no natural counterpart.See McRae et al. (2001) for a comprehensive description of the differences between wildfire and forest harvesting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McRae et al. (2001) source
- Premisecitation
Large eastern white pine trees are preferred refuge trees for black bear cubs.
“Large eastern white pine trees are known to be preferred refuge trees for black bear cubs (Rogers and Lindquist 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rogers and Lindquist 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Uncontrolled movement of seed for artificial regeneration can increase the probability of out-crossing.
“uncontrolled movement of seed for artificial regeneration can increase the probability of out-crossing (Joyce et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Joyce et al. 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Today modifications to logging practices require the retention of specified numbers and species of supercanopy trees, mast-producing trees, and live cavity trees.
“Today modifications to logging practices require the retention of specified numbers and species of supercanopy trees, mast-producing trees, and live cavity trees (Naylor 1998a, b;OMNR 2001b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Naylor 1998a, b;OMNR 2001b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Reductions, especially reductions of small isolated populations of tree species, increase the probability of inbreeding and genetic drift.
“Reductions, especially reductions of small isolated populations of tree species, increase the probability of inbreeding and genetic drift”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Joyce et al. 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Standards have been set in Ontario to prevent further reduction of small isolated stands.
“standards have been set in Ontario to prevent further reduction of small isolated stands (Pinto et al. 1998, OMNR 2001b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pinto et al. 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites OMNR 2001b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
- May combine two claims. 9
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdvances in fire suppression measures over the past several decades have reduced the number of early successional, post-fire, conifer-dominated stands in northeastern Ontario.
“Carleton and MacLellan (1994) suggest that advances in fire suppression measures over the past several decades have reduced the number of early successional, post-fire, conifer-dominated stands in northeastern Ontario.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carleton and MacLellan (1994) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe area between the historic high and low disturbance scenarios describes one measure of the range of historic variation that exists for a particular forest cover type.
“The area between these two scenarios describes one measure of the range of historic variation that exists for a particular forest cover type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAs factual data on age classes of old-growth forests are not generally available, computer models are often used to calculate probable age-class structures of forests.
“As factual data on age classes of old-growth forests are not generally available, computer models are often used to calculate probable age-class structures of forests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Factual data on age classes of old-growth forests are not generally available.
- Rests on an assumption: Age-class structures of presettlement forests in North America where natural disturbances and natural regeneration are dominant have not been described using verifiable methods.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAfter research and consultation, the Ontario Public Advisory Committee on old-growth forests recommended protecting specific areas as well as modifying forestry activities.
“After research and consultation, the Ontario Public Advisory Committee on old-growth forests recommended protecting specific areas as well as modifying forestry activities (Old-Growth Forests Policy Advisory Committee 1994).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Old-Growth Forests Policy Advisory Committee 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn white pine cover types of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forests of Ontario, moderate to low intensity fire makes poplar, birch, spruce, and balsam fir more likely to be killed.
“• Poplar, birch, spruce and balsam fir fir more likely to be left uncut more likely to be killed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf protection involves only a small proportion of the land base, there is the additional possibility that these protected areas could be lost in the event of infrequent, large-scale, intense disturbances.
“If protection involves only a small proportion of the land base, there is the additional possibility that these protected areas could be lost in the event of infrequent, large-scale, intense disturbances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone givenIn white spruce, poplar, and balsam fir cover types of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forests of Ontario, wind and insect disturbances make balsam fir more likely to be killed by spruce budworm.
“balsam fir more likely to be killed by spruce budworm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenIn Ontario, there is an understanding that protection, although important, is only part of the solution to maintaining healthy forests over the long term.
“In Ontario, there is an understanding that protection, although important, is only part of the solution to maintaining healthy forests over the long term.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEconomic theory suggests that high-value trees will have a greater likelihood of being harvested.
“Economic theory suggests that highvalue trees will have a greater likelihood of being harvested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone givenIn white spruce, poplar, and balsam fir cover types of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forests of Ontario, wind and insect disturbances make poplar more likely to be killed by forest tent caterpillar.
“• Poplar more likely to be killed by forest tent caterpillar, balsam fir more likely to be killed by spruce budworm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenForestry equipment may damage residual trees, advance regeneration, and understorey plants.
“Forestry equipment may damage residual trees, advance regeneration, and understorey plants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRetaining protected areas within a landscape of forests that are minimally modified may reduce the risk of loss of intact ecosystems to infrequent, large-scale, intense disturbances, and also limit unacceptable changes to natural processes at various spatial scales.
“Retaining protected areas within a landscape of forests that are minimally modified may reduce the risk of loss of intact ecosystems to infrequent, large-scale, intense disturbances, and also limit unacceptable changes to natural processes at various spatial scales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn even-aged forests, sustained yield principles can lead to a reduction in area of stands over rotation age.
“In even-aged forests, sustained yield principles can lead to a reduction in area of stands over rotation age.”
- Also stated in: § Trends For the Future · plain
“In even-aged forests, sustained yield principles can lead to a reduction in area of stands over rotation age.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Trends For the Future · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese forms of damage cannot be eliminated but can be minimized through employee training, advance planning, and the use of appropriate equipment for site and stand conditions.
“These forms of damage cannot be eliminated but can be minimized through employee training, advance planning, and the use of appropriate equipment for site and stand conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBebber et al. (2001) found that highgrading practices, described as structural retention harvests or retaining old-growth features, increased windthrow of residual trees, and limited natural regeneration of the tree species that were dominant in the overstorey before harvest.
“For example, Bebber et al. (2001) found that such highgrading practices, described as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bebber et al. (2001)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe assumption that long-term forest health can be maintained through the practice of ecosystem-based forestry is not accepted by all nor has it been tested.
“However, the assumption that long-term forest health can be maintained through the practice of ecosystembased forestry is not accepted by all nor has it been tested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the example shown in Figure 3, there are no stands over the rotation age, a condition not seen in forests where natural disturbances dominate.
“In the example shown, there are no stands over the rotation age, a condition not seen in forests where natural disturbances dominate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDead standing and fallen trees play a role in the life cycle of about 25% and 40%, respectively, of vertebrate species in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forests of Ontario.
“Dead standing and fallen trees play a role in the life cycle of about 25% and 40%, respectively, of vertebrate species in the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence forests of Ontario (Naylor 1998a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Naylor 1998a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe move to an ecosystem-based model of forestry in Ontario is recent, arising from changes in public views on forestry, particularly on public lands, and instituted in regulations and laws such as the Crown Forest Sustainability Act of 1994.
“The move to an ecosystem-based model of forestry in Ontario is recent, arising from changes in public views on forestry, particularly on public lands, and instituted in regulations and laws such as the Crown Forest Sustainability Act of 1994.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crown Forest Sustainability Act of 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Changes in the composition and structure of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forests, resulting from exploitative practices in the 19th and 20th centuries, led to concern for old-growth forests in Ontario.
“In particular, the type and speed of changes in the composition and structure of the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence forests led to concern, first for old-growth eastern white pine in Ontario, and then for oldgrowth forests generally.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Over the past two decades, changes in the composition and structure of forests in Ontario due to forestry became very obvious to many people.
“Over the past two decades, changes in the composition and structure of forests in Ontario due to forestry became very obvious to many people.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some changes were caused by forest activities, such as the replacement of tall large trees with small, often poorly formed, white birch, aspen, and jack pine trees.
“Some of these changes were caused by forest activities, such as the replacement of tall large trees (e.g., red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) and eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.)) with small, often poorly formed, white birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.), aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), and jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) trees.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These discussions led to an increase in the area of forests protected in provincial parks and changes in forest practices in Ontario.
“These discussions in turn led to an increase in the area of forests protected in provincial parks and changes in forest practices in Ontario.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Humans depend on timber resources.
“Humans depend on timber resources so, coupled with protection, forestry practices must also be evaluated and modified if necessary to prevent or mitigate negative consequences to the long-term health of the forest.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Factual data on age classes of old-growth forests are not generally available.
“As factual data on age classes of old-growth forests are not generally available, computer models are often used to calculate probable age-class structures of forests.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Age-class structures of presettlement forests in North America where natural disturbances and natural regeneration are dominant have not been described using verifiable methods.
“Age-class structures of presettlement forests in North America where natural disturbances and natural regeneration are dominant, in particular the proportion in the older age classes, have been the source of much speculation, but have not been described using verifiable methods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Older stands have a greater probability of losing a higher amount of their financial value due to disease and senescence compared with younger stands.
“Older stands have a greater probability of losing a higher amount of their financial value due to disease and senescence compared with younger stands.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The rotation age of eastern white pine is currently 100 to 120 years, but these trees may live to be 400 to 700 years old.
“For example, the rotation age of eastern white pine is currently 100 to 120 years, but these trees may live to be 400 to 700 years old.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In forests affected principally by natural disturbances, the intensity of tree mortality varies over space and time.
“In forests that are affected principally by natural disturbances, the intensity of tree mortality varies over space and time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Disturbances from fire, wind, ice, insect, and disease damage may overlap in a number of ways.
“Disturbances resulting from fire, wind, ice, insect, and disease damage may overlap in a number of ways.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sustained-yield forestry tends to reduce the amount and diversity of standing and fallen dead trees.
“Sustained-yield forestry tends to reduce the amount and diversity of standing and fallen dead trees.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In Ontario, the primary data used in most models are derived from the forest inventory and the rules and assumptions that govern the models are often not explicitly stated.
“In Ontario, the primary data used in most models are derived from the forest inventory and the rules and assumptions that govern the models are often not explicitly stated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Data from monitoring, inventories, planning, and implementation are often not explicitly connected.
“Data from monitoring, inventories, planning, and implementation are often not explicitly connected.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The green line shows the results of a disturbance cycle considered to be at the low end of disturbance cycles for this cover type and the red line the high end.
“Assuming the green line shows the results of a disturbance cycle that is considered to be at the low end of disturbance cycles for this cover type and the red line the high end”
The paper relies on this without support.
In Ontario, climatically similar areas, called seed zones, have been identified and used to limit seed movement.
“In Ontario, climatically similar areas, called seed zones, have been identified and used to limit seed movement.”
Cites
Age-class distribution and the forest fire cycle
Wagner, C. E. V. (1978) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x78-034 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Comparisons between wildfire and forest harvesting and their implications in forest management
McRae, D. J., Duchesne, L. C., Freedman, B., Lynham, T. J., & Woodley, S. (2001) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a01-010 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Carleton, T. J., & Maclellan, P. (1994) · Ecoscience · doi:10.1080/11956860.1994.11682238 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Buchert, G. P., Rajora, O. P., Hood, J. V., & Dancik, B. P. (1997) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96074.x · Cited by 112
Perspectives on development of definitions and values related to old-growth forests
Frelich, L., & Reich, P. (2003) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a03-011 · Cited by 95
Jackson, S. M., Pinto, F., Malcolm, J. R., & Wilson, E. R. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x99-242 · Cited by 90
Self-citationThe vegetation of postlogged black spruce lowlands in central Canada. I. Trees and tall shrubs
Brumelis, G., & Carleton, T. J. (1988) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x88-226 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
White pine management and conservation in Algonquin Park
Corbett, C. M. (1994) · The Forestry Chronicle · doi:10.5558/tfc70435-4 · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Brumelis G., J. Carleton., 198
- Journal, Forest Research, 18, 1470
- Ontario, Canada. Conservation Biology, 11, 747
- al Canadian, Ecoscience, 1, 141
- Algonquin Park. The Forestry Chronicle, 70, 435
- Dawson P., J. Maure., 199
- Research, 30, 605
- Munro, J. Leavey., 199
- Canadian Journal, Forest Research, 8, 220
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Old-growth definitions and management: A literature review
Hilbert, J., & Wiensczyk, A. M. (2007) · Journal of Ecosystems and Management · doi:10.22230/jem.2007v8n1a360 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Parker, W. C., Pitt, D. G., & Morneault, A. E. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.042 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Zenner, E. K., & Krueger, J. A. (2006) · The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society · doi:10.3159/1095-5674(2006)133[585:uaogrt]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Subject Index, Volume 79, 2003
(2003) · The Forestry Chronicle · doi:10.5558/tfc791139-6
- Authors
- Pinto, F.
- Corresponding author
- Pinto, Fred
- Venue
- The Forestry Chronicle
- Publisher
- Canadian Institute of Forestry
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 613-620
- ISSN
- 0015-7546 (ISSN-L)
- 1499-9315
- OpenAlex
- W2029427440
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Forestry Chronicle (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Keywords
- old-growth forest, Pinus strobus, red pine, forest composition change, natural disturbance, tree regeneration, tree adaptation, site factors, harvesting methods, Ontario
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review