Cited by 245Wildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementWildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

Effect of Hunting in Source‐Sink Systems in the Neotropics

Novaro, Andres J., Redford, Kent H., Bodmer, Richard E.·2000·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Previous studies of the sustainability of wildlife hunting in the Neotropics have not considered the potential dispersal of animals into hunted areas. A literature review of studies of subsistence hunting in the Neotropics suggests that hunting is often conducted in areas adjacent to relatively undisturbed habitat that may act as sources of animals for the hunted sites. We compared studies of tapir ( Tapirus terrestris ) hunting at different sites to illustrate the potential bias of sustainability evaluations based on local productivity. The limited information available suggests that dispersal could have a key role in rebuilding animal populations depleted by hunting. Thus, factors that strongly affect dispersal—such as spatial distribution and size of areas with and without hunting, population size in source areas, and social behavior—should be considered when the sustainability of hunting is evaluated in areas with heterogeneous hunting pressure. We suggest the application of two models that use spatial controls (recognizing the potential source‐sink nature of some hunted systems and protecting unhunted refugia) to avoid wildlife overexploitation when biological data and enforcement capabilities to regulate harvests are limited. This approach may produce more reliable evaluations of sustainability, provide information on the dynamics of hunting systems, and help local communities and policymakers conserve key areas (including protected areas) that may act as game sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98452.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Source-sink effects, spatial heterogeneity or high dispersal can also help maintain populations in hunted areas, masking or compensating for hunting driven population decline.

    “Source-sink effects (Novaro et al. 2000, Salas andKim 2002), spatial heterogeneity (Kümpel et al. 2010a, van Vliet et al. 2010a) or high dispersal (Hart 2000a) can also help maintain populations in hunted areas, masking or compensating for hunting driven population decline.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Novaro, A. J., Redford, K. H., & Bodmer, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
713-721
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2004046142
Cited by
245
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 20
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Florida
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Keywords
subsistence hunting, source-sink system, animal dispersal, Tapirus, Tapirus terrestris, hunting sustainability, wildlife overexploitation, refugia, Neotropical region, harvest regulation, population dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review