Effect of Hunting in Source‐Sink Systems in the Neotropics
Abstract
Abstract: Previous studies of the sustainability of wildlife hunting in the Neotropics have not considered the potential dispersal of animals into hunted areas. A literature review of studies of subsistence hunting in the Neotropics suggests that hunting is often conducted in areas adjacent to relatively undisturbed habitat that may act as sources of animals for the hunted sites. We compared studies of tapir ( Tapirus terrestris ) hunting at different sites to illustrate the potential bias of sustainability evaluations based on local productivity. The limited information available suggests that dispersal could have a key role in rebuilding animal populations depleted by hunting. Thus, factors that strongly affect dispersal—such as spatial distribution and size of areas with and without hunting, population size in source areas, and social behavior—should be considered when the sustainability of hunting is evaluated in areas with heterogeneous hunting pressure. We suggest the application of two models that use spatial controls (recognizing the potential source‐sink nature of some hunted systems and protecting unhunted refugia) to avoid wildlife overexploitation when biological data and enforcement capabilities to regulate harvests are limited. This approach may produce more reliable evaluations of sustainability, provide information on the dynamics of hunting systems, and help local communities and policymakers conserve key areas (including protected areas) that may act as game sources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Source-sink effects, spatial heterogeneity or high dispersal can also help maintain populations in hunted areas, masking or compensating for hunting driven population decline.
“Source-sink effects (Novaro et al. 2000, Salas andKim 2002), spatial heterogeneity (Kümpel et al. 2010a, van Vliet et al. 2010a) or high dispersal (Hart 2000a) can also help maintain populations in hunted areas, masking or compensating for hunting driven population decline.”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Novaro et al. 2000
Cites
Megaherbivores: The Influence of Very Large Body Size on Ecology
Owen-Smith, R. N. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511565441 · Cited by 955 · see citing works
Dispersal patterns of red foxes relative to population density
Allen, S. H., & Sargeant, A. B. (1993) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3809277 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bushmeat Exploitation in Tropical Forests: an Intercontinental Comparison
Fa, J. E., Peres, C. A., & Meeuwig, J. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00275.x · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554811798293872 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Population recovery patterns of Southeast Asian ungulates after poaching
Steinmetz, R., Chutipong, W., Seuaturien, N., Chirngsaard, E., & Khaengkhetkarn, M. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.023 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
- Authors
- Novaro, A. J., Redford, K. H., & Bodmer, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 713-721
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2004046142
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Florida
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
- Keywords
- subsistence hunting, source-sink system, animal dispersal, Tapirus, Tapirus terrestris, hunting sustainability, wildlife overexploitation, refugia, Neotropical region, harvest regulation, population dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review