The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prescribing Flood Regimes to Sustain Riparian Ecosystems along Meandering Rivers
Abstract
Abstract: The composition and structure of native riverine ecosystems are tightly linked to natural hydrologic variability. By managing river flows for water supplies and power generation, water management agencies have inadvertently caused considerable degradation of riverine ecosystems and associated biodiversity. New approaches for meeting human needs for water while conserving the ecological integrity of riverine ecosystems are greatly needed. We describe an approach for identifying the natural flooding characteristics that must be protected or restored to maintain riparian ( floodplain) ecosystems along meandering rivers. We developed a computer model to simulate flood‐driven changes in the relative abundance of riparian patch types along the Yampa River in Colorado ( U.S.A.). The model is based on research suggesting that the duration of flooding at or above 209 m 3 per second (125% of bankfull discharge) is particularly important in driving lateral channel migration, which is responsible for initiating ecological succession in the Yampa's riparian forest. Other hydrologic variables, such as the magnitude of annual peak flows, were not as strongly correlated with lateral channel migration rates. Model simulations enabled us to tentatively identify a threshold of alteration of flood duration that could lead to substantial changes in the abundance of forest patch types over time should river flows be regulated by future water projects. Based on this analysis, we suggest an ecologically compatible water management approach that avoids crossing flood alteration thresholds and provides opportunity to use a portion of flood waters for human purposes. Recommended improvements to the Yampa model include obtaining additional low‐elevation aerial photographs of the river corridor to enable better estimation of channel migration rates and vegetation changes. These additional data should greatly improve the model's accuracy and predictive capabilities and therefore its management value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
POFF, N. L., RICHTER, B. D., ARTHINGTON, A. H., BUNN, S. E., NAIMAN, R. J., KENDY, E., ACREMAN, M., APSE, C., BLEDSOE, B. P., FREEMAN, M. C., et al. (2010) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x · Cited by 1,595
Self-citationGurnell, A. M., Bertoldi, W., & Corenblit, D. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.11.005 · Cited by 502
Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwoods: stream flow dependency, water relations and restoration
Rood, S. B., Braatne, J. H., & Hughes, F. M. R. (2003) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/23.16.1113 · Cited by 295
MODELING THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN RIVER MORPHODYNAMICS AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION
Camporeale, C., Perucca, E., Ridolfi, L., & Gurnell, A. M. (2013) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/rog.20014 · Cited by 265
RENÖFÄLT, B. M., JANSSON, R., & NILSSON, C. (2010) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02241.x · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Richter, B. D., & Richter, H. E.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-10-18
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1467-1478
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W1983431507
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prescribing Flood Regimes to Sustain Riparian Ecosystems along Meandering Rivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98488.x
- The paper
- Richter, B. D., & Richter, H. E. (2000). Prescribing Flood Regimes to Sustain Riparian Ecosystems along Meandering Rivers. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98488.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.