The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwoods: stream flow dependency, water relations and restoration
Abstract
Cottonwoods (Populus spp.) are adapted to riparian or floodplain zones throughout the Northern Hemisphere; they are also used as parents for fast-growing hybrid poplars. We review recent ecophysiological studies of the native cottonwoods Populus angustifolia James, P. balsamifera L., P. deltoides Marsh., P. fremontii S. Watson and P. trichocarpa T. & G. in North America, and P. nigra L. in Europe. Variation exists within and across species and hybrids; however, all riparian cottonwoods are dependent on shallow alluvial groundwater that is linked to stream water, particularly in semi-arid regions. This conclusion is based on studies of their natural occurrence, decline following river damming and dewatering (water removal), water relations, isotopic composition of xylem water, and by the establishment of cottonwoods along formerly barren natural channels after flow augmentation in response to the conveyance of irrigation water. When alluvial groundwater is depleted as a result of river dewatering or groundwater pumping, riparian cottonwoods exhibit drought-stress responses including stomatal closure and reduced transpiration and photosynthesis, altered 13C composition, reduced predawn and midday water potentials, and xylem cavitation. These physiological responses are accompanied by morphological responses including reduced shoot growth, altered root growth, branch sacrifice and crown die-back. In severe cases, mortality occurs. For example, severe dewatering of channels of the braided Big Lost River in Idaho led to mortality of the narrowleaf cottonwood, P. angustifolia, and adjacent sandbar willows, Salix exigua Nutt., within 5 years, whereas riparian woodlands thrived along flowing channels nearby. The conservation and restoration of cottonwoods will rely on the provision of river flow regimes that satisfy these ecophysiological requirements for survival, growth and reproduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
REDUCED COTTONWOOD RECRUITMENT FOLLOWING EXTIRPATION OF WOLVES IN YELLOWSTONE'S NORTHERN RANGE
Beschta, R. L. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-0964 · Cited by 94
Euring, D., Löfke, C., Teichmann, T., & Polle, A. (2012) · Trees · doi:10.1007/s00468-012-0761-0 · Cited by 55
Groundwater and Remotely Sensed Phenology Reveal Vulnerability of Riparian Trees to Drought
Mohammadi, R. M., Dawson, T. E., Tiedeman, C. R., Stella, J. C., & Ruhí, A. (2025) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.70564 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Rood, S. B., Braatne, J. H., & Hughes, F. M. R.
- Venue
- Tree Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1113-1124
- ISSN
- 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-4469
- OpenAlex
- W2151250891
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwoods: stream flow dependency, water relations and restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/treephys/23.16.1113
- The paper
- Rood, S. B., Braatne, J. H., & Hughes, F. M. R. (2003). Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwoods: stream flow dependency, water relations and restoration. Tree Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.16.1113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.