Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,059

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Habitat Loss and Extinction in the Hotspots of Biodiversity

Brooks, Thomas M., Mittermeier, Russell A., Mittermeier, Cristina G., Da Fonseca, Gustavo A. B., Rylands, Anthony B., Konstant, William R., Flick, Penny, Pilgrim, John, Oldfield, Sara, Magin, Georgina, Hilton‐Taylor, Craig·2002·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Nearly half the world's vascular plant species and one‐third of terrestrial vertebrates are endemic to 25 “hotspots” of biodiversity, each of which has at least 1500 endemic plant species. None of these hotspots have more than one‐third of their pristine habitat remaining. Historically, they covered 12% of the land's surface, but today their intact habitat covers only 1.4% of the land. As a result of this habitat loss, we expect many of the hotspot endemics to have either become extinct or—because much of the habitat loss is recent—to be threatened with extinction. We used World Conservation Union [ IUCN ] Red Lists to test this expectation. Overall, between one‐half and two‐thirds of all threatened plants and 57% of all threatened terrestrial vertebrates are hotspot endemics. For birds and mammals, in general, predictions of extinction in the hotspots based on habitat loss match numbers of species independently judged extinct or threatened. In two classes of hotspots the match is not as close. On oceanic islands, habitat loss underestimates extinction because introduced species have driven extinctions beyond those caused by habitat loss on these islands. In large hotspots, conversely, habitat loss overestimates extinction, suggesting scale dependence (this effect is also apparent for plants). For reptiles, amphibians, and plants, many fewer hotspot endemics are considered threatened or extinct than we would expect based on habitat loss. This mismatch is small in temperate hotspots, however, suggesting that many threatened endemic species in the poorly known tropical hotspots have yet to be included on the IUCN Red Lists. We then asked in which hotspots the consequences of further habitat loss (either absolute or given current rates of deforestation) would be most serious. Our results suggest that the Eastern Arc and Coastal Forests of Tanzania‐Kenya, Philippines, and Polynesia‐Micronesia can least afford to lose more habitat and that, if current deforestation rates continue, the Caribbean, Tropical Andes, Philippines, Mesoamerica, Sundaland, Indo‐Burma, Madagascar, and Chocó–Darién–Western Ecuador will lose the most species in the near future. Without urgent conservation intervention, we face mass extinctions in the hotspots.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00530.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. 10.2307/2255763 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/mrd.1120100405 · doi:10.1002/mrd.1120100405
  3. 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10026-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061539.x · DOI
  5. Boitani L., 1999, AMD African mammals databank: a databank for the conservation and management of the African mammals
  6. Borkin L. J., 1999, Patterns of distribution of amphibians, 329
  7. Brooks T. M., 2000, Threatened birds of the world, 695
  8. 10.1038/380115a0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95493.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98341.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00353.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00353.x
  12. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00067.x · DOI
  13. 10.1086/284267 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/35003563 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/35010105 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1017/S0030605300021505 · doi:10.1017/s0030605300021505
  17. Collar N. J., 1994, Birds to watch. 2
  18. Da Fonseca G. A. B., 1996, Lista anotada dos mamiferos do Brasil., Occasional Papers in Conservation Biology, 4, 1
  19. 10.1038/35013249 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/370104b0 · doi:10.1038/370104b0
  21. Dickinson E. C., 1991, The birds of the Philippines
  22. Duellman W. E., 1999, Patterns of distribution of amphibians, 255, 10.56021/9780801861154 · doi:10.56021/9780801861154
  23. Eisenberg J. F., 1989, Mammals of the Neotropics. 1. The northern Neotropics: Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana
  24. Eisenberg J. F., 1999, Mammals of the Neotropics. 3. The central Neotropics: Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Brazil
  25. Food and Agriculture Organization, 1997, State of the world's forests 1997
  26. 10.1023/A:1018356506390 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Frost D. R., 1985, Amphibian species of the world: a taxonomic and geographical reference
  28. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01713.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0653:TGDORD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00060.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00060.x
  31. 10.1098/rstb.1994.0049 · DOI
  32. Gurung K. K., 1996, Field guide to the mammals of the Indian subcontinent
  33. 10.1007/BF00137781 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.2307/3546614 · doi:10.2307/3546614
  35. Helin S., 1999, The mammalian of China
  36. Hilton‐Taylor C., 1996, Red Data List of southern African plants. Strelitzia 4
  37. 10.1038/35008052 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Inger R. F., 1999, Patterns of distribution of amphibians, 445
  39. Koopman K. F., 1989, Biogeography of the West Indies, 635
  40. MacArthur R. H., 1967, The theory of island biogeography
  41. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5202-1_13 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/373294a0 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/35012251 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003516.x · DOI · Paper page
  45. Mittermeier R. A., 1999, Hotspots
  46. Oldfield S., 1998, The world list of threatened trees
  47. Olson D. M., 1998, The Global 200: a representation approach to conserving the earth's most biologically valuable ecoregions., Conservation Biology, 12, 502, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1086/285704 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.2307/4089405 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/BF00052716 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9343 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Pimm S. L., 2000, Nature and human society: the quest for a sustainable world, 46
  53. 10.1038/35002708 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1086/284889 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1098/rstb.1994.0047 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/science.269.5222.347 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Poynton J. C., 1999, Patterns of distribution of amphibians, 483
  58. 10.2307/2666209 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1038/365335a0 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Redford K. H., 1992, Mammals of the Neotropics. 2. The Southern Cone: Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay
  61. 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04272.x · DOI · Paper page
  62. Simberloff D., 1992, Tropical deforestation and species extinction, 75
  63. Spiegel M. R., 1994, Theory and problems of statistics
  64. Stattersfield A. J., 1998, Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation
  65. Steadman D. W., 1995, Prehistoric extinctions of Pacific island birds: biodiversity meets zooarcheology., Science, 267, 1123, 10.1126/science.267.5201.1123 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1093/oso/9780195125191.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Srikosamatara S., 1992, Wildlife trade in Lao P.D.R. and between Lao P.D.R. and Thailand. Natural History Bulletin of the, Siam Society, 40, 1
  68. Tyler M. J., 1999, Patterns of distribution of amphibians, 541
  69. Udvardy M. D. F., 1975, A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world
  70. Uetz P., 1996, The EMBL/EBI reptile database., Herpetological Review, 27, 174
  71. Walter K. S., 1998, 1997 IUCN Red List of threatened plants
  72. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040570.x · DOI · Paper page
  73. Woods C. A., 1989, Biogeography of the West Indies, 741
  74. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1994, Biodiversity data sourcebook
  75. World Conservation Union, 1994, IUCN Red List categories
  76. World Wide Fund for Nature, 1994, Centres of plant diversity. 1. Europe, Africa, South‐west Asia and the Middle East
  77. World Wide Fund for Nature, 1995, Centres of plant diversity. 2. Asia, Australasia and the Pacific
  78. World Wide Fund for Nature, 1997, Centres of plant diversity. 3. The Americas

Cited by

See all 2,059

Metadata

Authors
Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., Rylands, A. B., Konstant, W. R., Flick, P., Pilgrim, J., Oldfield, S., Magin, G., & Hilton‐Taylor, C.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
909-923
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2057732249
Cited by
2,059
References
2
FWCI
28.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Habitat Loss and Extinction in the Hotspots of Biodiversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00530.x
The paper
Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., Rylands, A. B., Konstant, W. R., Flick, P., Pilgrim, J., Oldfield, S., Magin, G., & Hilton‐Taylor, C. (2002). Habitat Loss and Extinction in the Hotspots of Biodiversity. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00530.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.