CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4,631

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic conservation planning

Margules, C. R., Pressey, R. L.·2000·Nature
DOI 10.1038/35012251
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35012251

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The establishment of new protected areas depends heavily on the management of socio-economic conflicts and on the knowledge that decision makers have about stakeholder's interests.

    “We are aware that the establishment of new protected areas depends heavily on the management of socio-economic conflicts and in the knowledge that decision makers have about stakeholder's interests (Margules and Pressey 2000; Dudley and Parish 2006).”

    From Maximizing species conservation in continental E cuador: a case of systematic conservation planning for biodiverse regions (2014) · cites this paper as Margules and Pressey 2000

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 104

  1. Kanowski, P. J., Gilmour, D. A., Margules, C. R. & Potter, C. S. International Forest Conservation: Protected Areas and Beyond (Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 1999).
  2. Chandrashekara, U. M. & Sankar, S. Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, India. For. Ecol. Mgmt 112, 165–177 (1998). · DOI
  3. Grove, R. H. Origins of western environmentalism. Sci. Am. 267, 22–27 (1992). · DOI
  4. Hanks, J. Protected areas during and after conflict: the objectives and activities of the Peace Parks Foundation. Parks 7, 11– 24 (1997).
  5. World Conservation Union. Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, 1994).
  6. Terborgh, J. Requiem for Nature (Island, Washington DC, 1999).
  7. Austin, M. P. & Margules, C. R. in Wildlife Conservation Evaluation (ed. Usher, M. B.) 45–67 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1986). · DOI
  8. Soulé, M. E. (ed.) Viable Populations for Conservation (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1987). · DOI
  9. Shafer, C. L. National park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements. Landscape Urban Plan. 44, 123– 153 (1999). · DOI
  10. Peres, C. A. & Terborgh, J. W. Amazonian nature reserves: an analysis of the defensibility status of existing conservation units and design criteria for the future. Conserv. Biol. 9, 34–46 (1995). · DOI
  11. Holling, C. S. (ed.) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, and Wiley, Toronto, 1978).
  12. Pressey, R. L. in Ecology for Everyone: Communicating Ecology to Scientists, the Public and the Politicians (eds Wills, R. & Hobbs, R.) 73– 87 (Surrey Beatty, Sydney, 1998)
  13. Cowling, R. M., Pressey, R. L., Lombard, A. T., Desmet, P. G. & Ellis, A. G. From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable reserve system in the species-rich Mediterranean-climate deserts of southern Africa. Div. Distrib. 5, 51–71 (1999). · DOI
  14. Davis, F. W., Stoms, D. M. & Andelman, S. Systematic reserve selection in the USA: an example from the Columbia Plateau ecoregion. Parks 9, 31–41 (1999).
  15. Nix, H. A. et al. The BioRap Toolbox: A National Study of Biodiversity Assessment and Planning for Papua New Guinea. Consultancy Report to World Bank (CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 2000).
  16. Noss, R. F., Strittholt, J. R., Vance-Borland, K., Carroll, C. & Frost, P. A conservation plan for the Klamath-Siskiyou ecoregion. Nat. Areas J. 19, 392– 411 (1999).
  17. Dobson, A. P., Rodriguez, J. P., Roberts, W. M. & Wilcove, D. S. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275, 550–553 ( 1997). · DOI
  18. Aiken, S. R. Peninsular Malaysia's protected areas' coverage, 1903–92: creation, rescission, excision, and intrusion. Environ. Conserv. 21, 49–56 (1994). · DOI
  19. Pressey, R. L. et al. How well protected are the forests of north-eastern New South Wales?—Analyses of forest environments in relation to tenure, formal protection measures and vulnerability to clearing. For. Ecol. Mgmt 85, 311–333 ( 1996). · DOI
  20. Ranta, P., Blom, T., Niemela, J., Joensuu, E. & Siitonen, M. The fragmented Atlantic rain forest of Brazil: size, shape and distribution of forest fragments. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 385–403 (1998). · DOI
  21. Sarkar, S. Wilderness preservation and biodiversity conservation—keeping divergent goals distinct. BioScience 49, 405– 412 (1999). · DOI
  22. Noss, R. F., O'Connell, M. A. & Murphy, D. D. The Science of Conservation Planning: Habitat Conservation under the Endangered Species Act (Island, Washington, 1997).
  23. Pressey, R. L. & Logan, V. S. in Conservation Outside Nature Reserves (eds Hale, P. & Lamb, D.) 407– 418 (Univ. Queensland Press, Brisbane, 1997).
  24. Hansen, A. J., Garman, S. L., Marks, B. & Urban, D. L. An approach for managing vertebrate diversity across multiple-use landscapes. Ecol. Applic. 3, 481–496 (1993). · DOI
  25. Prendergast, J. R. et al. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335– 337 (1993). · DOI
  26. van Jaarsveld, A. S. et al. Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science 279, 2106 (1998). · DOI
  27. Howard, P. C. et al. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394, 472– 475 (1998). · DOI
  28. McKenzie, N. L., Belbin, L., Margules, C. R. & Keighery, J. G. Selecting representative reserve systems in remote areas: a case study in the Nullarbor region, Australia. Biol. Conserv. 50, 239 (1989). · DOI
  29. Goldstein, P. Z. Functional ecosystems and biodiversity buzzwords. Conserv. Biol. 13, 247–255 ( 1999). · DOI
  30. Nix, H. A. in Evolution of the Flora and Fauna of Australia (eds Baker, W. R. & Greenslade, P. J. M.) 47–66 (Peacock, Adelaide, 1982).
  31. Nix, H. A. in Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia (ed. Longmore, R.) 4– 14 (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1986).
  32. Austin, M. P. Continuum concept, ordination methods and niche theory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 39–61 ( 1985). · DOI
  33. Austin, M. P., Nicholls, A. O. & Margules, C. R. Measurement of the qualitative realised niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species. Ecol. Monogr. 60, 161–177 (1990). · DOI
  34. Wessels, K. J., Freitag, S. & van Jaarsveld, A. S. The use of land facets as biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at a local scale. Biol. Conserv. 89, 21–38 (1999). · DOI
  35. Richards, B. N. et al. Biological Conservation of the South-East Forests (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1990).
  36. Ferrier, S. & Watson, G. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Environmental Surrogates and Modelling Techniques in Predicting the Distribution of Biological Diversity (Environment Australia, Canberra, 1997).
  37. Margules, C. R. & Austin, M. P. Biological models for monitoring species decline: the construction and use of data bases. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344, 69– 75 (1994). · DOI
  38. Nelson, B. W., Ferreira, C. A. C., da Silva, M. F. & Kawasaki, M. L. Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection intensity in Brazilian Amazonia. Nature 345, 714– 716 (1990). · DOI
  39. Austin, M. P. & Meyers, J. A. Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of Eucalypts: implications for management of forest biodiversity. For. Ecol. Mgmt 85, 95– 106 (1996). · DOI
  40. Deadman, P. J. & Gimblett, H. R. Applying neural networks to vegetation management plan development. AI Applic. 11, 107 (1997).
  41. Jennings, M. D. Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecol. 15, 5–20 ( 2000). · DOI
  42. Pressey, R. L. & Logan, V. S. Size of selection units for future reserves and its influence on actual vs. targeted representation of features: a case study in western New South Wales. Biol. Conserv. 85, 305–319 ( 1998). · DOI
  43. Soulé, M. E. & Sanjayan, M. A. Conservation targets: do they help? Science 279, 2060 (1998). · DOI
  44. Margules, C. R. & Nicholls, A. O. in Nature Conservation: The Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation (eds Saunders, D. A., Arnold, G. W., Burbidge, A. A. & Hopkins, A. J. M.) 89– 102 (Surrey Beatty, Sydney, 1987).
  45. Balmford, A., Mace, G. M. & Ginsberg, J. A. in Conservation in a Changing World (eds Mace, G. M., Balmford, A. & Ginsberg, J. A.) 1–28 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998).
  46. MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton, New Jersey, 1967).
  47. Diamond, J. M. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol. Conserv. 7, 129 (1975). · DOI
  48. Wilson, E. O. & Willis, E. O. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 522–534 (Belknap, Cambridge, MA, 1975).
  49. Higgs, A. J. Island biogeography and nature reserve design. J. Biogeogr. 8, 117–124 (1981). · DOI
  50. Sauer J. D. Oceanic islands and biogeographical theory. Geogr. Rev. 59, 585 (1969). · DOI
  51. Davies, K. F., Margules, C. R. & Lawrence, J. F. Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81 (in the press). · DOI · Paper page
  52. Levins, R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15, 237–240 (1969).
  53. Holt, R. D. & Gaines, M. S. in Patch Dynamics (eds Levin, S. A., Powell, T. M. & Steele, J. H.) 260–276 (Springer, Berlin, 1993). · DOI
  54. Gilpin, M. E. in Viable Populations for Conservation (ed. Soulé, M. E.) 126–139 (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1987).
  55. Bennett, A. F. Linkages in the Landscape: the Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, 1998).
  56. Thomas, C. D. et al. in Conservation in a Changing World (eds Mace, G. M., Balmford, A. & Ginsberg, J. R.) 107–138 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998).
  57. Holt, R. D. in Species Diversity in Ecological Communities (eds Ricklefs, R. E. & Schluter, D.) 77–96 (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1993).
  58. Lindenmayer, D. B. & Possingham, H. P. The Risk of Extinction: Ranking Management Options for Leadbeater's Possum (Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, 1995).
  59. Pickett, S. T. A., & Thompson, J. N. Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 13 , 27–37 (1978). · DOI
  60. Lamberson, R. H., Noon, B. R., Voss, C. & McKelvey, R. Reserve design for territorial species: the effects of patch size and spacing on the viability of the Northern Spotted Owl. Conserv. Biol. 8, 185–195 (1994). · DOI
  61. Burgman, M., Ferson, S. & Akçakaya, H. R. Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993)
  62. Lindenmayer, D. B., Burgman, M. A., Akçakaya, H. R., Lacy, R. C. & Possingham, H. P. A review of three models for metapopulation viability analysis—ALEX, RAMAS/Space and VORTEX. Ecol. Model. 82, 161–174 (1995). · DOI
  63. Lambeck, R. J. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol. 11, 849–856 (1997). · DOI
  64. Dias, P. C. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 326–330 (1999). · DOI
  65. Braithwaite, L. W., Binns, D. L. & Nowlan, R. D. The distribution of arboreal marsupials in relation to eucalypt forest types in the Eden (NSW) Woodchip Concession Area. Aust. Wildl. Res. 10, 231–247 (1988). · DOI
  66. Kapos, V. Effects of isolation on the water status of forest patches in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Trop. Ecol. 5, 173 (1989). · DOI
  67. Didham, R. K., Hammond, P. M., Lawton, J. H., Eggleton, P. & Stork, N. E. Beetle species responses to tropical forest fragmentation. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 295–323 (1998). · DOI
  68. Margules, C. R., Milkovits, G. A. & Smith, G. T. Contrasting effects of habitat fragmentation on the scorpion, Cercophonius squama and an amphipod. Ecology 75, 2033–2042 (1994). · DOI
  69. Cochrane, M. A et al. Positive feedbacks in the fire dynamic of closed canopy tropical forests. Science 284, 1832– 1835 (1999). · DOI
  70. Yates C. J. & Hobbs, R. J. Temperate eucalypt woodlands: a review of their status, processes threatening their persistence and techniques for restoration. Aust. J. Bot. 45, 949– 973 (1997). · DOI
  71. Frankel, O. H. & Soulé, M. E. Conservation and Evolution (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1981 ).
  72. Rojas, M. The species problem and conservation: what are we protecting? Conserv. Biol. 6, 170–178 (1992). · DOI
  73. Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, P. H. What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235– 254 (1991). · DOI
  74. Fjeldsa, J. Geographic patterns for relict and young species of birds in Africa and South America and implications for conservation priorities. Biodiv. Conserv. 3, 207–226 ( 1994). · DOI
  75. Kiester, A. R. et al. Conservation prioritization using GAP data. Conserv. Biol. 10, 1332–1342 ( 1996). · DOI
  76. Kirkpatrick, J. B. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv. 25, 127–134 (1983). · DOI
  77. Stoms, D. M. GAP management status and regional indicators of threats to biodiversity. Landscape Ecol. 15, 21–33 (2000). · DOI
  78. Noss, R. F. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: a suggested framework and indicators . For. Ecol. Mgmt 115, 135– 146 (1999). · DOI
  79. Williams, P. H. in Conservation in a Changing World (eds Mace, G. M., Balmford, A. & Ginsberg, J. R.) 211–249 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998).
  80. Faith, D. P. Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 345, 45– 48 (1994). · DOI
  81. Colwell, R. K. & Coddington, J. A. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 345, 101–108 (1994). · DOI
  82. Faith, D. P. & Walker, P. A. Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiv. Conserv. 5, 399 –415 (1996). · DOI
  83. Belbin, L. Environmental representativeness: regional partitioning and reserve selection . Biol. Conserv. 66, 223– 230 (1993). · DOI
  84. Faith, D. P. & Norris, R. Correlation of environmental variables with patterns of distribution and abundance of common and rare freshwater macroinvertebrates. Biol. Conserv. 50, 77 –89 (1989). · DOI
  85. Williams, P. H. et al. Comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots and complementary areas for conserving biodiversity, using British birds. Conserv. Biol. 10, 155–174 ( 1996). · DOI
  86. Ferrier, S., Pressey, R. L. & Barrett, T. W. A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biol. Conserv. (in the press). · DOI
  87. Faith, D. P., Margules, C. R., Walker, P. A., Hutchinson, M. & Nix, H. A. in Science for Pacific Posterity: Environments, Resources and Welfare of the Pacific People (ed. Anon) 153 (Univ. of New South Wales Press, Sydney, 1999).
  88. Faith, D. P., Walker, P. A., Ive, J. R. & Belbin, L. in Conserving Biological Diversity in Temperate Forest Ecosystems—Towards Sustainable Management (ed. Anon) 74–75 (Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, 1994).
  89. Faith, D. P. & Walker, P. A. in BioRap Volume 3. Tools for Assessing Biodiversity Priority Areas (eds Faith, D. P. & Nicholls, A. O.) 63–74 (The Australian BioRap Consortium, Canberra, 1996).
  90. Faith, D. P. & Walker, P. A. Integrating conservation and development: effective trade-offs between biodiversity and cost in the selection of protected areas. Biodiv. Conserv. 5, 417– 429 (1996). · DOI
  91. Pressey, R. L. in National Parks and Protected Areas: Selection, Delimitation and Management (eds Pigram, J. J. & Sundell, R. C.) 337– 357 (Univ. of New England, Centre for Water Policy Research, Armidale, 1997).
  92. Myers, N. Threatened biotas: hotspots in tropical forests. The Environmentalist 8, 178–208 ( 1988).
  93. Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Thomsen, J. B., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Olivieri, S. Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 12, 516– 520 (1998). · DOI
  94. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  95. Dinerstein, E. & Wikramanayake, E. D. Beyond “hotspots”: how to prioritize investments to conserve biodiversity in the Indo-Pacific region. Conserv. Biol. 7, 53–65 (1993). · DOI
  96. Balmford, A. & Long, A. Avian endemism and forest loss. Nature 372, 623–624 ( 1994). · DOI
  97. Sisk, T. D., Launer, A. E., Switky, K. R. & Erlich, P. R. Identifying extinction threats: global analyses of the distribution of biodiversity and the expansion of the human enterprise. BioScience 44, 592–604 (1994). · DOI
  98. Ricketts, T. H. et al. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment (Island, Washington DC, 1999)
  99. Myers, N. The Sinking Ark: A New Look at the Problem of Disappearing Species (Pergamon, Oxford, 1979).
  100. James, A. N. Institutional constraints to protected area funding. Parks 9, 15–26 (1999).
  101. Stolton, S. & Dudley, N. A preliminary survey of management status and threats in forest protected areas. Parks 9, 27–33 (1999).
  102. Caughley, G. & Sinclair, A. R. E. Wildlife Management and Ecology (Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA, 1994).
  103. Hockings, M. & Phillips, A. How well are we doing?—Some thoughts on the effectiveness of protected areas. Parks 9, 5–14 (1999).
  104. Faith, D. P. & Walker, P. A. in National Parks and Protected Areas: Selection, Delimitation and Management (eds Pigram, J. J. & Sundell, R. C.) 297–314 (Univ. New England Press, Armidale, 1997).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Margules, C. R., & Pressey, R. L.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-05
Volume
405
Issue
6783
Pages
243-253
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/35012251
Cited by
4,631
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review