Bushmeat and International Development
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Commercial trade is probably the primary driver of the increasing levels of bushmeat off take in the Congo Basin.
“Commercial trade is probably the primary driver of the increasing levels of bushmeat off take in the Congo Basin (Bennett et al. 2007, Davies 2002).”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Davies 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554811798293872 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
- Authors
- Davies, G.
- Affiliations
- Zoological Society of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Davies, Glyn
- ORCID
- Davies, Glyn
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05-28
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 587-589
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W1986677243
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- bushmeat, international development, wildlife trade, wildlife conservation, subsistence hunting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
