The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging Issues in Population Viability Analysis
Abstract
Abstract: Population viability analysis ( PVA) has become a commonly used tool in endangered species management. There is no single process that constitutes PVA, but all approaches have in common an assessment of a population's risk of extinction (or quasi extinction) or its projected population growth either under current conditions or expected from proposed management. As model sophistication increases, and software programs that facilitate PVA without the need for modeling expertise become more available, there is greater potential for the misuse of models and increased confusion over interpreting their results. Consequently, we discuss the practical use and limitations of PVA in conservation planning, and we discuss some emerging issues of PVA. We review extant issues that have become prominent in PVA, including spatially explicit modeling, sensitivity analysis, incorporating genetics into PVA, PVA in plants, and PVA software packages, but our coverage of emerging issues is not comprehensive. We conclude that PVA is a powerful tool in conservation biology for comparing alternative research plans and relative extinction risks among species, but we suggest caution in its use: (1) because PVA is a model, its validity depends on the appropriateness of the model's structure and data quality; (2) results should be presented with appropriate assessment of confidence; (3) model construction and results should be subject to external review, and (4) model structure, input, and results should be treated as hypotheses to be tested. We also suggest (5) restricting the definition of PVA to development of a formal quantitative model, (6) focusing more research on determining how pervasive density‐dependence feedback is across species, and (7) not using PVA to determine minimum population size or (8) the specific probability of reaching extinction. The most appropriate use of PVA may be for comparing the relative effects of potential management actions on population growth or persistence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hanski, L. (1999) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198540663.001.0001 · Cited by 3,535
Quantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the United States
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., & Losos, E. (1998) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313420 · Cited by 3,097
Population Genetic Consequences of Small Population Size: Implications for Plant Conservation
Ellstrand, N. C. (1993) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.24.1.217 · Cited by 2,631
Caswell, H. (2014) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat07481 · Cited by 2,448
Genetics and Demography in Biological Conservation
Lande, R. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3420403 · Cited by 2,426
Directions in Conservation Biology
Caughley, G. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5542 · Cited by 2,405
Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation
Shaffer, M. L. (1981) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1308256 · Cited by 2,014
A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics
Hanski, I. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5591 · Cited by 1,640
Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review
Frankham, R. (1995) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300034455 · Cited by 1,370
Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival
Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M., & Yoccoz, N. G. (1998) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01237-8 · Cited by 1,362
Cited by
Estimates of minimum viable population sizes for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates
Reed, D. H., O'Grady, J. J., Brook, B. W., Ballou, J. D., & Frankham, R. (2003) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00346-4 · Cited by 512
A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot—the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa
Cowling, R. M., Pressey, R. L., Rouget, M., & Lombard, A. T. (2003) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00425-1 · Cited by 435
An Emerging Role of Zoos to Conserve Biodiversity
Conde, D. A., Flesness, N., Colchero, F., Jones, O. R., & Scheuerlein, A. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200674 · Cited by 399
How Much Is Enough? The Recurrent Problem of Setting Measurable Objectives in Conservation
TEAR, T. H., KAREIVA, P., ANGERMEIER, P. L., COMER, P., CZECH, B., KAUTZ, R., LANDON, L., MEHLMAN, D., MURPHY, K., RUCKELSHAUS, M., et al. (2005) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0835:hmietr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 357
Browsing and fire interact to suppress tree density in an African savanna
Staver, A. C., Bond, W. J., Stock, W. D., van Rensburg, S. J., & Waldram, M. S. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-1907.1 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, J. M., Mills, L. S., Dunning, J. B., Menges, E. S., McKelvey, K. S., Frye, R., Beissinger, S. R., Anstett, M., & Miller, P.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01-18
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-19
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2157565246
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 26.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging Issues in Population Viability Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99419.x
- The paper
- Reed, J. M., Mills, L. S., Dunning, J. B., Menges, E. S., McKelvey, K. S., Frye, R., Beissinger, S. R., Anstett, M., & Miller, P. (2002). Emerging Issues in Population Viability Analysis. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99419.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.