The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Forest Fragmentation on Lyme Disease Risk
Abstract
Abstract: Forest destruction and fragmentation in the United States recently have been shown to reduce mammalian species diversity and to elevate population densities of white‐footed mice ( Peromyscus leucopus ). One potential consequence of reduced species diversity and high mouse density in small fragments is an increase in human exposure to Lyme disease. Increased risk of exposure to this disease is expected because of the role of the white‐footed mouse as the principal natural reservoir of the Lyme bacterium, Borrelia burgdorferi . Blacklegged ticks ( Ixodes scapularis ) feeding on mice have a higher probability of becoming infected with the bacterium than do ticks feeding on any other host species. We hypothesized that small forest patches ( <2 ha ) have a higher density of infected nymphal blacklegged ticks, which is the primary risk factor for Lyme disease, than larger patches ( 2–8 ha ). In the summer of 2000, we sampled tick density and B. burgdorferi infection prevalence in 14 maple‐dominated forest patches, ranging in size from 0.7 to 7.6 ha, in Dutchess County of southeastern New York state. We found a significant linear decline in nymphal infection prevalence with increasing patch area and a significant exponential decline in nymphal density with increasing patch area. The consequence was a dramatic increase in the density of infected nymphs, and therefore in Lyme disease risk, with decreasing forest patch size. We did not observe a similar relationship between the density of larval ticks and patch size. These results suggest that by influencing the community composition of vertebrate hosts for disease‐bearing vectors, habitat fragmentation can influence human health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Andrén, H., & Andren, H. (1994) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545823 · Cited by 3,037
Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation
Murcia, C. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)88977-6 · Cited by 3,006
A Survey and Overview of Habitat Fragmentation Experiments
Debinski, D. M., & Holt, R. D. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98081.x · Cited by 1,412
HABITAT LOSS AND POPULATION DECLINE: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE PATCH SIZE EFFECT
Bender, D. J., Contreras, T. A., & Fahrig, L. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0517:hlapda]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 868
Biodiversity and Disease Risk: the Case of Lyme Disease
Ostfeld, R. S., & Keesing, F. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99014.x · Cited by 733
Self-citationThe Biological and Social Phenomenon of Lyme Disease
Barbour, A. G., & Fish, D. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8503006 · Cited by 642
BIODIVERSITY AND THE DILUTION EFFECT IN DISEASE ECOLOGY
Schmidt, K. A., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0609:batdei]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 605
Self-citationSurveillance for Lyme disease--United States, 1992-1998.
Orloski, K. A., Hayes, E. B., Campbell, G. L., & Dennis, D. T. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 573
Biodiversity series: The function of biodiversity in the ecology of vector-borne zoonotic diseases
Ostfeld, R. S., & Keesing, F. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z00-172 · Cited by 482
Self-citationLane, R. S., Piesman, J., & Burgdorfer, W. (1991) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.003103 · Cited by 469
Cited by
Whitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., Boltz, F., Capon, A. G., de Souza Dias, B. F., Ezeh, A., Frumkin, H., Gong, P., Head, P., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60901-1 · Cited by 2,998
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation
Ewers, R. M., & Didham, R. K. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006949 · Cited by 2,218
Kremen, C., Williams, N. M., Aizen, M. A., Gemmill‐Herren, B., LeBuhn, G., Minckley, R., Packer, L., Potts, S. G., Roulston, T., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., et al. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x · Cited by 1,493
Landscape Ecology: What Is the State of the Science?
Turner, M. G. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614 · Cited by 990
Spatial epidemiology: an emerging (or re-emerging) discipline
OSTFELD, R., GLASS, G., & KEESING, F. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.009 · Cited by 757
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Allan, B. F., Keesing, F., & Ostfeld, R. S.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 267-272
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2105196831
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Forest Fragmentation on Lyme Disease Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01260.x
- The paper
- Allan, B. F., Keesing, F., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2003). Effect of Forest Fragmentation on Lyme Disease Risk. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01260.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.