Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 740

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diagnostic value of standardized assays for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in idiopathic systemic vasculitis

Open access
Hagen, E. Christiaan, Daha, Mohamed R., Hermans, Jo, Andrassy, Konrad, Csernok, Elena, Gaskin, Gillian, Lesavre, Phillippe, Lüdemann, Jens, Rasmussen, Niels, Sinico, R. Alberto, Wiik, Allan, van der Woude, Fokko J., for the EC/BCR Project for ANCA Assay Standardization·1998·Kidney International

Abstract

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are widely used as diagnostic markers for Wegener's granulomatosis (WG), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) and idiopathic rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (iRPGN). The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of ANCA measurement by the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test, and by anti-PR3 and anti-MPO ELISA performed in different locations, in patients with idiopathic small vessel vasculitis. Fourteen centers participated in a standardization study of ANCA assays, and entered a total number of 169 newly diagnosed and 189 historical patients with idiopathic systemic vasculitis or iRPGN. Patients were classified according to a pre-defined diagnostic classification system. Results were compared with those of 184 disease controls and 740 healthy controls. The IIF test was performed according to standard methodology; ELISAs had been standardized among the participants in a previous phase of the study. The sensitivities of assays in patients were as follows. The sensitivity in WG was: cANCA 64%, pANCA 21%, anti-PR3 66%, anti-MPO 24%. In MPA the sensitivity was: cANCA 23%, pANCA 58%, anti-PR3 26%, anti-MPO 58%. Sensitivity in iRPGN was: cANCA 36%, pANCA 45%, anti-PR3 50%, anti-MPO 64%. The specificity of assays (related to disease controls) was: cANCA 95%, pANCA 81%, anti-PR3 87%, anti-MPO 91%. When the results of the IIF test were combined with those of the ELISAs (cANCA/anti-PR3 positive, pANCA/anti-MPO positive), the diagnostic specificity increased to 99%. The sensitivity of the combination of cANCA + anti-PR3 or pANCA + anti-MPO for WG, MPA or iRPGN was 73%, 67% and 82%, respectively. From this study we conclude that the value of the IIF test for ANCA detection can be greatly increased by the addition of a well standardized antigen-specific ELISA. In a significant number of patients with idiopathic small vessel vasculitis, however, the ANCA test results (either in IIF or ELISA) are negative.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00807.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 740

Metadata

Authors
Hagen, E. C., Daha, M. R., Hermans, J., Andrassy, K., Csernok, E., Gaskin, G., Lesavre, P., Lüdemann, J., Rasmussen, N., Sinico, R. A., Wiik, A., van der Woude, F. J., & for the EC/BCR Project for ANCA Assay Standardization
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-03
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
743-753
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988376766
Cited by
740
References
0
FWCI
37.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic value of standardized assays for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in idiopathic systemic vasculitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00807.x
The paper
Hagen, E. C., Daha, M. R., Hermans, J., Andrassy, K., Csernok, E., Gaskin, G., Lesavre, P., Lüdemann, J., Rasmussen, N., Sinico, R. A., Wiik, A., van der Woude, F. J., & for the EC/BCR Project for ANCA Assay Standardization. (1998). Diagnostic value of standardized assays for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in idiopathic systemic vasculitis. Kidney International. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00807.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.