The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Value of ANCA measurements during remission to predict a relapse of ANCA-associated vasculitis--a meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The value of repeated ANCA measurements among patients with an established diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to explore whether either of the two distinct patterns of ANCA values during remission, a rise in ANCA or persistently positive ANCA, predicted future relapse. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE searches were performed. Studies with at least 10 subjects with AAV from which both sensitivity and specificity of a rise in ANCA and/or persistent ANCA for future disease relapse could be calculated were included. Likelihood ratios were calculated for each study and pooled to arrive at summary estimates. I(2)-values were calculated as a measure of heterogeneity and meta-regression was used to explore sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Nine articles on a rise in ANCA and nine articles on persistent ANCA were included. The summary estimates for positive likelihood ratio (LR(+)) and negative likelihood ratio (LR(-)) of a rise in ANCA during remission on subsequent relapse of disease were 2.84 (95% CI 1.65, 4.90) and 0.49 (95% CI 0.27, 0.87), respectively. The summary estimates for LR(+) and LR(-) of persistent ANCA during remission for subsequent disease relapse were 1.97 (95% CI 1.43, 2.70) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.50, 1.06), respectively. There was substantial between-study heterogeneity, which was partially explained by the frequency of ANCA measurements. CONCLUSION: Among patients with AAV, a rise in or persistence of ANCA during remission is only modestly predictive of future disease relapse. There is limited use to serial ANCA measurements during disease remission to guide treatment decisions for individual patients with AAV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Whiting, P., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M., & Kleijnen, J. (2003) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25 · Cited by 3,592
Reitsma, J. B., Glas, A. S., Rutjes, A. W. S., Scholten, R. J. P. M., Bossuyt, P. M., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 · Cited by 3,369
Van Der Woude, F. J., Lobatto, S., Permin, H., Van Der Giessen, M., Rasmussen, N., Wiik, A., Van Es, L. A., Van Der Hem, G. K., & The, T. H. (1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91147-x · Cited by 1,885
Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
Deeks, J. J. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 · Cited by 1,340
Xiao, H., Heeringa, P., Hu, P., Liu, Z., Zhao, M., Aratani, Y., Maeda, N., Falk, R. J., & Jennette, J. C. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci15918 · Cited by 1,005
Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies
Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., & Matchar, D. B. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-v · Cited by 932
Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
(2001) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 850
Hagen, E. C., Daha, M. R., Hermans, J., Andrassy, K., Csernok, E., Gaskin, G., Lesavre, P., Lüdemann, J., Rasmussen, N., Sinico, R. A., et al. (1998) · Kidney International · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00807.x · Cited by 740
Cited by
Plasma Exchange and Glucocorticoids in Severe ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
Walsh, M., Merkel, P. A., Peh, C.-A., Szpirt, W. M., Puéchal, X., Fujimoto, S., Hawley, C. M., Khalidi, N., Floßmann, O., Wald, R., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1803537 · Cited by 893
Self-citationvan Enst, W. A., Ochodo, E., Scholten, R. J., Hooft, L., & Leeflang, M. M. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-70 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomasson, G., Grayson, P. C., Mahr, A. D., LaValley, M., & Merkel, P. A.
- Venue
- Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-10-29
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100-109
- ISSN
- 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-0332
- OpenAlex
- W2118291318
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value of ANCA measurements during remission to predict a relapse of ANCA-associated vasculitis--a meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rheumatology/ker280
- The paper
- Tomasson, G., Grayson, P. C., Mahr, A. D., LaValley, M., & Merkel, P. A. (2012). Value of ANCA measurements during remission to predict a relapse of ANCA-associated vasculitis--a meta-analysis. Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.