The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Multicenter, Double‐Blind Study on Triple Therapy with Lansoprazole, Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Japanese Peptic Ulcer Patients
Abstract
Background.: Two triple therapies with lansoprazole (LPZ)/amoxicillin (AMPC)/clarithromycin (CAM) for eradication of Helicobacter pylori were studied in multicenter, double‐blind fashion to evaluate the eradication rate of H. pylori and safety of eradiation treatment in Japanese patients with H. pylori‐positive active gastric ulcers or duodenal ulcers. Methods.: Patients were randomly chosen for the control treatment of LPZ 30 mg twice a day (b.i.d.; Group A‐LPZ‐only) or the test treatments of LPZ 30 mg plus AMPC 750 mg and CAM 200 mg b.i.d. (Group B‐LAC200) and LPZ 30 mg, AMPC 750 mg and CAM 400 mg b.i.d. (Group C‐LAC400). All eradication treatments lasted for a period of 7 days. Successful eradication was assessed by culture and gastric histology 1 month after completion of the ulcer treatment. Results.: The eradication rates of H. pylori in the full analysis set were 0% in Group A‐LPZ‐only, 87.5% in Group B‐LAC200 and 89.2% in Group C‐LAC400 for gastric ulcer and, 4.4% in Group A‐LPZ‐only, 91.1% in Group B‐LAC200 and 83.7% in Group C‐LAC400 for duodenal ulcer. The eradication rates of Group B‐LAC200 and Group C‐LAC400 were 89.2% (95% CI: 84.8–93.7%) and 86.4% (95%CI: 81.5–91.3%) in total in the full analysis set, 89% (95% CI: 84.3–93.7%) and 85.3% (95%CI: 80.1–90.5%) in the per protocol set. The eradication rates in Groups B‐LAC200 and group C‐LAC400 were statistically significantly higher than the rate in Group A‐LPZ‐only for both gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer patients (p < .0001 for both). Conclusion.: A satisfactorily high H. pylori eradication rate was obtained in Japanese ulcer patients with the triple therapy regimen consisting of LPZ 30 mg, AMPC 750 mg, and CAM 200 mg b.i.d.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification and Grading of Gastritis: The Updated Sydney System
Dixon, M. F., Genta, R. M., Yardley, J. H., & Correa, P. (1996) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-199610000-00001 · Cited by 5,185
Cited by
The Japanese Guidelines for Gastric Cancer Screening
Hamashima, C., Shibuya, D., Yamazaki, H., Inoue, K., Fukao, A., Saito, H., & Sobue, T. (2008) · Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1093/jjco/hyn017 · Cited by 403
Imase, K., Takahashi, M., Tanaka, A., Tokunaga, K., Sugano, H., Tanaka, M., Ishida, H., Kamiya, S., & Takahashi, S. (2008) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00026.x · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Asaka, M., Sugiyama, T., Kato, M., Satoh, K., Kuwayama, H., Fukuda, Y., Fujioka, T., Takemoto, T., Kimura, K., Shimoyama, T., Shimizu, K., & Kobayashi, S.
- Venue
- Helicobacter
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 254-262
- ISSN
- 1083-4389 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-5378
- OpenAlex
- W2077994119
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multicenter, Double‐Blind Study on Triple Therapy with Lansoprazole, Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Japanese Peptic Ulcer Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-5378.2001.00037.x
- The paper
- Asaka, M., Sugiyama, T., Kato, M., Satoh, K., Kuwayama, H., Fukuda, Y., Fujioka, T., Takemoto, T., Kimura, K., Shimoyama, T., Shimizu, K., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). A Multicenter, Double‐Blind Study on Triple Therapy with Lansoprazole, Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Japanese Peptic Ulcer Patients. Helicobacter. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-5378.2001.00037.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.