The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological Sequelae and Alopecia Among Women with Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE: This article reviews the relevant literature on treatment-induced alopecia in women with cancer and describes the development of a computer-assisted intervention to reduce distress associated with this side effect. DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM: Alopecia has been cited as the most disturbing anticipated side effect by up to 58% of women preparing for chemotherapy, with 8% being at risk for avoiding treatment. Women with cancer who experience alopecia as a side effect, compared with women with cancer and no alopecia, report lower self-esteem, poorer body image, and lower quality of life. Although physicians' recommendations are the most influential factor on cancer treatment choice, body image and effects on sexuality are the next most influential factors. A study of a computer-imaging intervention, based on concepts related to guided imagery and anticipatory grief, has been launched in an effort to aid women in coping with anticipated treatment-related alopecia. RESULTS: While we are still waiting for final data collection and analysis from the computer intervention study, the feedback thus far has been positive. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The intervention described here may prove to be effective in desensitizing women with cancer to hair loss and facilitating an adjustment to self-acceptance. As such, a higher quality of life during the difficult time of coping may be maintained. The development of a computer-imaging intervention offers an opportunity to integrate a standard psychosocial intervention, personalized for each patient, into the routine patient care in the oncology setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136319 · Cited by 7,791
Psychosocial Impact of Breast Cancer: A Critical Review
Glanz, K., & Lerman, C. (1992) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/14.3.204 · Cited by 292
Cited by
The psychological impact of alopecia
Hunt, N., & McHale, S. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7522.951 · Cited by 450
Pathobiology of chemotherapy-induced hair loss
Paus, R., Haslam, I. S., Sharov, A. A., & Botchkarev, V. A. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70553-3 · Cited by 304
Cancer and stigma: experience of patients with chemotherapy-induced alopecia
Rosman, S. (2004) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00040-5 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- McGarvey, E. L., Baum, L. D., Pinkerton, R. C., & Rogers, L. M.
- Venue
- Cancer Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 283-289
- ISSN
- 1065-4704 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-5394
- OpenAlex
- W2052323088
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological Sequelae and Alopecia Among Women with Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.96007.x
- The paper
- McGarvey, E. L., Baum, L. D., Pinkerton, R. C., & Rogers, L. M. (2001). Psychological Sequelae and Alopecia Among Women with Cancer. Cancer Practice. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.96007.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.