Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of Facial Rhytids with a Nonablative Laser: A Clinical and Histologic Study

Menaker, Gregg M., Wrone, David A., Williams, Ronda M., Moy, Ronald L.·1999·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current facial resurfacing modalities (laser, chemical peels, and dermabrasion) remove the epidermis and thus cause open wounds which carry significant risks and extended recovery periods. The nonablative laser is a novel Nd:YAG system designed to alleviate facial rhytids without injuring the epidermis. This new modality may offer patients rhytid removal without the risk seen in currently used resurfacing techniques. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel nonablative laser system and assess its safety profile and efficacy. METHODS: Ten patients received laser treatments of their periocular rhytids and postauricular skin. Clinical variables (rhytid severity, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, scarring, and level of discomfort) were assessed at 1 and 3 months posttreatment. Postauricular skin biopsies were taken both pre- and posttreatment for histologic analysis. RESULTS: Patient discomfort was minimal. Three months posttreatment, 4 of 10 patients showed a one-point improvement in periocular rhytid severity when judged on a six-point scale. The results were not statistically significant. Biopsy analysis showed a small posttreatment increase in the amount of dermal collagen in three patients. A small decrease in collagen was noted in one patient. Three patients also showed a small posttreatment increase in the degree homogenization of dermal collagen. No change from baseline was noted in other assessed histologic parameters. Complications observed included hyperpigmentation in three patients and pitted scarring in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: The nonablative laser gave clinically subtle and statistically insignificant improvement in rhytid severity. Unfortunately its use was associated with complications that included hyperpigmentation and scarring. This technology may eventually offer patients a new resurfacing option, but its efficacy and complication rate must be improved first.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08158.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Menaker, G. M., Wrone, D. A., Williams, R. M., & Moy, R. L.
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
1999-06
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
440-444
ISSN
1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053529957
Cited by
206
References
1
FWCI
18.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Facial Rhytids with a Nonablative Laser: A Clinical and Histologic Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08158.x
The paper
Menaker, G. M., Wrone, D. A., Williams, R. M., & Moy, R. L. (1999). Treatment of Facial Rhytids with a Nonablative Laser: A Clinical and Histologic Study. Dermatologic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08158.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.