Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Factors for Metastasis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin

Cherpelis, Basil S., Marcusen, Christine, Lang, Pearon G.·2002·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin exhibits a significant propensity to metastasize. A number of variables have been reported to influence the tendency of SCC to metastasize. Because of the increasing incidence of skin cancer, it is becoming increasingly important to identify those neoplasms which are biologically more aggressive. We report 25 cases of metastatic SCC and compare them to 175 cases of nonmetastasizing SCC treated during the same period. OBJECTIVE: To characterize tumors with the greatest tendency to metastasize. METHODS: A tumor registry from the Dermatologic Surgery Unit at the Medical University of South Carolina was accessed to obtain records on 200 patients diagnosed with invasive SCC managed by Mohs surgery from 1988 to 1998. A retrospective analysis was conducted. The characteristics of patients with metastatic SCC and those with nonmetastatic SCC were compared using the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of 200 tumors, 25 (12.5%) metastasized. Size, Clark's level, degree of differentiation, the presence of small tumor nests, infiltrative tumor strands, single-cell infiltration, perineural invasion, acantholysis, and recurrence all correlated strongly with metastasis. Location, ulceration, inflammation, and Breslow depth did not correlate with the development of metastasis. CONCLUSION: Patients with tumors that exhibit certain clinical and histologic features are more likely to metastasize and need close follow-up to detect recurrence and metastasis early, allowing for appropriate life-saving intervention. Sentinel lymph node biopsy should be considered in patients with high-risk SCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01169.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Cherpelis, B. S., Marcusen, C., & Lang, P. G.
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2002-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
268-273
ISSN
  • 1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4725
OpenAlex
W2018442027
Cited by
328
References
1
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Factors for Metastasis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01169.x
The paper
Cherpelis, B. S., Marcusen, C., & Lang, P. G. (2002). Prognostic Factors for Metastasis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin. Dermatologic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01169.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.