Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The incidence and clinical analysis of non-melanoma skin cancer

Open access
Ciążyńska, Magdalena, Kamińska-Winciorek, Grażyna, Lange, Dariusz, Lewandowski, Bogumił, Reich, Adam, Sławińska, Martyna, Pabianek, Marta, Szczepaniak, Katarzyna, Hankiewicz, Adam, Ułańska, Małgorzata, Morawiec, Jan, Błasińska-Morawiec, Maria, Morawiec, Zbigniew, Piekarski, Janusz, Nejc, Dariusz, Brodowski, Robert, Zaryczańska, Anna, Sobjanek, Michał, Nowicki, Roman J., Owczarek, Witold, Słowińska, Monika, Wróbel, Katarzyna, Bieniek, Andrzej, Woźniacka, Anna, Skibińska, Małgorzata, Narbutt, Joanna, Niemczyk, Wojciech, Ciążyński, Karol, Lesiak, Aleksandra·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are the most common malignancies diagnosed in Caucasian populations. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent skin cancer, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Unfortunately, most European cancer registries do not record individual types of NMSC. To evaluate the incidence of primary BCCs and SCCs regarding age, sex, tumour site and tumour subtype to determine trends in epidemiology of both cancers. Retrospective analysis of BCCs and SCCs diagnosed and treated across seven sites in Poland from 1999 to 2019. We recorded 13,913 NMSCs occurring in 10,083 patients. BCC represented 85.2% of all cases. SCC patients were older than BCC patients (77.1 ± 11.3 years vs. 70.1 ± 12.3 years, p < 0.01). The nodular subtype was the most common subtype of BCC, followed by the superficial and infiltrative subtypes. The superficial BCC subtype was more common on photoprotected areas (p < 0.01), whereas the nodular BCC subtype occurred on the face (p < 0.01). The high-risk SCC subtypes were more common on face compared to low-risk SCC subtypes (p < 0.01). BCC and SCC are common malignancies developing at various ages and anatomical sites. These data underline the need for better registration policies regarding NMSC in order to improve prevention and treatment strategies for these tumours.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-83502-8

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Ciążyńska, M., Kamińska-Winciorek, G., Lange, D., Lewandowski, B., Reich, A., Sławińska, M., Pabianek, M., Szczepaniak, K., Hankiewicz, A., Ułańska, M., Morawiec, J., Błasińska-Morawiec, M., Morawiec, Z., Piekarski, J., Nejc, D., Brodowski, R., Zaryczańska, A., Sobjanek, M., Nowicki, R. J., Owczarek, W., Słowińska, M., Wróbel, K., Bieniek, A., Woźniacka, A., Skibińska, M., Narbutt, J., Niemczyk, W., Ciążyński, K., & Lesiak, A.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-02-22
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
4337-4337
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3129383910
Cited by
266
References
40
FWCI
29.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The incidence and clinical analysis of non-melanoma skin cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-021-83502-8
The paper
Ciążyńska, M., Kamińska-Winciorek, G., Lange, D., Lewandowski, B., Reich, A., Sławińska, M., Pabianek, M., Szczepaniak, K., Hankiewicz, A., Ułańska, M., Morawiec, J., Błasińska-Morawiec, M., Morawiec, Z., Piekarski, J., Nejc, D., Brodowski, R., Zaryczańska, A., Sobjanek, M., Nowicki, R. J., . . . Lesiak, A. (2021). The incidence and clinical analysis of non-melanoma skin cancer. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83502-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.