The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biochemical analysis of wound fluid from nonhealing and healing chronic leg ulcers
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the biochemical composition of fluid taken from chronic wounds, to compare these values with that of serum, and therefore to assess whether the wound fluid is representative of the extracellular environment of the wound. Paired wound fluid and blood samples were collected from eight patients with chronic leg ulcers in a nonhealing and healing phase. Wound fluid and serum samples were screened for a profile of general biochemical analyses, including electrolytes, lactate, glucose, and protein analyses. Electrolyte levels were essentially identical in wound fluid and serum samples. Lactate and lactate dehydrogenase levels were significantly greater and glucose and bicarbonate levels were significantly lower in wound fluid when compared with the paired serum samples. Albumin and total protein levels in wound fluid were on average half those of serum levels. In this small sample of eight patients, wound fluid collected from chronic leg ulcers is an exudate with the biochemical composition expected in extracellular fluid. In addition, bicarbonate and glucose levels increase and C‐reactive protein levels decrease in wound fluid, but remain unchanged in serum, during healing. These results suggest changes in the state of hypoxia and the inflammatory process in the healing wound.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Analysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors
Trengove, N. J., Stacey, M. C., Macauley, S., Bennett, N., Gibson, J., Burslem, F., Murphy, G., & Schultz, G. (1999) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00442.x · Cited by 908
Self-citationThe antimicrobial peptide SAAP-148 combats drug-resistant bacteria and biofilms
de Breij, A., Riool, M., Cordfunke, R. A., Malanovic, N., de Boer, L., Koning, R. I., Ravensbergen, E., Franken, M., van der Heijde, T., Boekema, B. K., et al. (2018) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aan4044 · Cited by 555
Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Song, J., Yang, J., Du, Z., Zhao, W., Guo, H., Wen, C., Li, Q., Sui, X., et al. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201905493 · Cited by 538
Mitogenic activity and cytokine levels in non-healing and healing chronic leg ulcers
Trengove, N. J., Bielefeldt‐Ohmann, H., & Stacey, M. C. (2000) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00013.x · Cited by 432
Self-citationDysregulation of monocyte/macrophage phenotype in wounds of diabetic mice
Mirza, R., & Koh, T. J. (2011) · Cytokine · doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2011.06.016 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Trengove, N. J., Langton, S. R., & Stacey, M. C.
- Venue
- Wound Repair and Regeneration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 234-239
- ISSN
- 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-475X
- OpenAlex
- W2141184932
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemical analysis of wound fluid from nonhealing and healing chronic leg ulcers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1524-475x.1996.40211.x
- The paper
- Trengove, N. J., Langton, S. R., & Stacey, M. C. (1996). Biochemical analysis of wound fluid from nonhealing and healing chronic leg ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475x.1996.40211.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.