Cited by 121Wound Healing and TreatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer

Development of a reconstructed human skin model for angiogenesis

Sahota, Parbinder S., Burn, J. Lance, Heaton, Martin, Freedlander, Eric, Suvarna, Simon K., Brown, Nicola J., Mac Neil, Shelia·2003·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

We have previously shown that reconstructed human skin engineered from autologous keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and sterilized donor allodermis stimulates angiogenesis within 5-7 days when placed on well-vascularized wound beds in nude mice. When this reconstructed skin was used clinically in more demanding wound beds, some grafts were lost, possibly due to delayed vascularization. As this reconstructed skin lacks any endothelial cells, our aim in this study was to develop an angiogenic reconstructed skin model in which to explore strategies to improve angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. We report that culture of small-vessel human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HuDMECs) was achieved using magnetic beads coated with an antibody to platelet cell adhesion molecule as a means of purifying the culture. Keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and HuDMECs could be cultured from the same skin biopsy. Initial studies culturing HuDMECs and other sources of endothelial cells with the tissue-engineered skin showed that these cells were capable of slowly entering the dermis under standard culture conditions in vitro. In conclusion, this provides us with a model in which to explore strategies for improving angiogenesis in vitro and also establishes the culture methodologies for the production of reconstructed skin containing autologous keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2003.11407.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahota, P. S., Burn, J. L., Heaton, M., Freedlander, E., Suvarna, S. K., Brown, N. J., & Mac Neil, S.
Affiliations
  • Northern General Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
275-284
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W2005367935
Cited by
121
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal College of Surgeons of England
  • Healing Foundation
  • School of Medicine, Emory University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Keywords
reconstructed human skin, angiogenesis, dermal microvascular endothelial cells, autologous keratinocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cell culture, wound healing
MeSH terms
Fibroblasts, Humans, Models, Biological, Skin, Keratinocytes, Skin Transplantation, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Cell Culture Techniques, Dermis, Endothelial Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review