The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical weight in the development of insect body size
Abstract
SUMMARY Body size is one of the most important life history characters of organisms, yet little is known of the physiological mechanisms that regulate either body size or variation in body size. Here, we examined one of these mechanisms, the critical weight, which is defined as the minimal mass at which further growth is not necessary for a normal time course to pupation. The critical weight occurred at 55% of peak larval mass in laboratory‐reared larvae of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta. We examined the effects of genetic and environmental variation in the critical weight on body size. As in many other insects, Manduca larvae reared on poor diets were smaller and those reared at lower temperatures were larger than control animals. We demonstrated that the critical weight was lower on low quality diets but did not change with temperature. There was significant genetic variation for body size, for plasticity of body size, and for critical weight, but not for plasticity of critical weight. Variation in the critical weight accounted for 73% of between‐family variance in peak larval size, whereas plasticity of critical weight was not significantly correlated with plasticity of body size. Our results suggest that although critical weight is an important factor in determining body size and enabling the evolution of body size, it may, at the same time, act as a constraint on the evolution of plasticity of body size. Thus, the determinants of body size and the determinants of plasticity of body size do not need to be identical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
Cited by
Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective
Chown, S. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2009.00097.x · Cited by 772
How flies get their size: genetics meets physiology
Edgar, B. A. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1989 · Cited by 441
The control of body size in insects
Nijhout, H. F. (2003) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00276-8 · Cited by 384
Self-citationSize and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects
Shingleton, A. W., Frankino, W. A., Flatt, T., Nijhout, H. F., & Emlen, D. J. (2007) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20584 · Cited by 355
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Davidowitz, G., D'Amico, L. J., & Nijhout, H. F.
- Venue
- Evolution & Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 188-197
- ISSN
- 1520-541X (ISSN-L)
- 1525-142X
- OpenAlex
- W2073840364
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical weight in the development of insect body size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1525-142x.2003.03026.x
- The paper
- Davidowitz, G., D'Amico, L. J., & Nijhout, H. F. (2003). Critical weight in the development of insect body size. Evolution & Development. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142x.2003.03026.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.