The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Approximating Nature's Variation: Selecting and Using Reference Information in Restoration Ecology
Abstract
Restoration ecologists use reference information to define restoration goals, determine the restoration potential of sites, and evaluate the success of restoration efforts. Basic to the selection and use of reference information is the need to understand temporal and spatial variation in nature. This is a challenging task: variation is likely to be scale dependent; ecosystems vary in complex ways at several spatial and temporal scales; and there is an important interaction between spatial and temporal variation. The two most common forms of reference information are historical data from the site to be restored and contemporary data from reference sites (sites chosen as good analogs of the site to be restored). Among the problems of historical data are unmeasured factors that confound the interpretation of historical changes observed. Among the problems of individual reference sites is the difficulty of finding or proving a close match in all relevant ecological dimensions. Approximating and understanding ecological variation will require multiple sources of information. Restoration, by its inherently experimental nature, can further the understanding of the distribution, causes, and functions of nature's variation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803
Fire-Southern Oscillation Relations in the Southwestern United States
Swetnam, T. W., & Betancourt, J. L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.249.4972.1017 · Cited by 672
Cited by
Standards for ecologically successful river restoration
PALMER, M. A., BERNHARDT, E. S., ALLAN, J. D., LAKE, P. S., ALEXANDER, G., BROOKS, S., CARR, J., CLAYTON, S., DAHM, C. N., FOLLSTAD SHAH, J., et al. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x · Cited by 1,578
Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology
Palmer, M. A., Ambrose, R. F., & Poff, N. L. (1997) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.1997.00543.x · Cited by 1,120
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE ECOSYSTEMS: A BROAD PERSPECTIVE
Allen, C. D., Savage, M., Falk, D. A., Suckling, K. F., Swetnam, T. W., Schulke, T., Stacey, P. B., Morgan, P., Hoffman, M., & Klingel, J. T. (2002) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1418:erospp]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 945
Microbial biomarkers as an indicator of ecosystem recovery following surface mine reclamation
Mummey, D. L., Stahl, P. D., & Buyer, J. S. (2002) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(02)00090-2 · Cited by 205
Evaluation on the Restoration Effects in the River Restoration Projects Practiced in South Korea
An, J. H., Lim, B. S., Seol, J., Kim, A. R., Lim, C. H., Moon, J. S., & Lee, C. S. (2022) · Water · doi:10.3390/w14172739 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- White, P. S., & Walker, J. L.
- Venue
- Restoration Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 338-349
- ISSN
- 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-100X
- OpenAlex
- W1970690010
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Approximating Nature's Variation: Selecting and Using Reference Information in Restoration Ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1526-100x.1997.00547.x
- The paper
- White, P. S., & Walker, J. L. (1997). Approximating Nature's Variation: Selecting and Using Reference Information in Restoration Ecology. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.1997.00547.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.