Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

DISTRIBUTION OF INTRACELLULAR NITROGEN IN MARINE MICROALGAE: BASIS FOR THE CALCULATION OF SPECIFIC NITROGEN‐TO‐PROTEIN CONVERSION FACTORS

Open access
Lourenço, Sergio O., Barbarino, Elisabete, Marquez, Ursula M. Lanfer, Aidar, Elizabeth·1998·Journal of Phycology

Abstract

The utilization of nitrogen‐to‐protein conversion factors (N‐Prot factors) is a widely accepted and practical way to determine total protein content. The accuracy of protein determination depends on the establishment of specific N‐Prot factors, since the conventional factor of 6.25 may be unsuitable for all species. This study was designed to determine the concentrations of the main nitrogenous compounds and to establish N‐Prot factors specific for the following marine microalgae: Chlorella minutissima, Dunaliella tertiolecta, Hillea sp., Isochrysis galbana, Nannochloropsis oculata, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Prorocentrum minimum, Skeletonema costatum, Synechococcus subsalsus, and Tetraselmis gracilis. Cultures were maintained under a 12‐h photoperiod (300 μmol photons·m−2·s−1) at temperatures of 20.0°± 1.0° C (dark) to 23.0°± 2.0° C (light) in Walne’s culture medium without additional external carbon sources. The distribution of intracellular nitrogen was studied by determining total nitrogen (TN, by CHN [carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen] analysis), protein N (PN, by analysis of total amino acids), and nonprotein N (NPN, determined by analysis of DNA, RNA, chlorophylls (chl) a,b, and c, and intracellular inorganic nitrogen—NO 3−, NO 2−, and NH 3+ NH 4+) in logarithmic and stationary growth phases of cultures. Variations occurred in both accumulation and distribution of PN and NPN among the species, as well as in each species during the different growth phases. Inorganic nitrogen compounds were observed to be the most important NPN source (from 6.4 ± 0.1% to 41.8 ± 4.2% of total N) in all species (except D. tertiolecta), followed by nucleic acids (from 0.8 ± 0.1% to 26.1 ± 2.4% of TN) and chlorophylls (from 0.2 ± 0.0% to 3.1 ± 0.3% of TN). Total amino acid residues ranged from 63.1 ± 4.6% up to 88.1 ± 11.2% of TN, which is in agreement with the presence of high NPN concentrations. N‐Prot factors are proposed for each growth phase in the studied species, based on the ratio of amino acid residues to TN, establishing specific N‐prot factors ranging from 3.60 ± 0.27 to 4.99 ± 0.64. The mean N‐Prot factor for all species/growth phases was 4.58 ± 0.11. The present study shows that the use of the traditional factor 6.25 is not suitable for these marine microalgae, and possibly for other species, because it overestimates their actual protein content.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340798.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Lourenço, S. O., Barbarino, E., Marquez, U. M. L., & Aidar, E.
Venue
Journal of Phycology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-10
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
798-811
ISSN
  • 0022-3646 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8817
OpenAlex
W2041961760
Cited by
191
References
0
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DISTRIBUTION OF INTRACELLULAR NITROGEN IN MARINE MICROALGAE: BASIS FOR THE CALCULATION OF SPECIFIC NITROGEN‐TO‐PROTEIN CONVERSION FACTORS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340798.x
The paper
Lourenço, S. O., Barbarino, E., Marquez, U. M. L., & Aidar, E. (1998). DISTRIBUTION OF INTRACELLULAR NITROGEN IN MARINE MICROALGAE: BASIS FOR THE CALCULATION OF SPECIFIC NITROGEN‐TO‐PROTEIN CONVERSION FACTORS. Journal of Phycology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340798.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.