The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new algorithm for haplotype‐based association analysis: the Stochastic‐EM algorithm
Abstract
Summary: It is now widely accepted that haplotypic information can be of great interest for investigating the role of a candidate gene in the etiology of complex diseases. In the absence of family data, haplotypes cannot be deduced from genotypes, except for individuals who are homozygous at all loci or heterozygous at only one site. Statistical methodologies are therefore required for inferring haplotypes from genotypic data and testing their association with a phenotype of interest. Two maximum likelihood algorithms are often used in the context of haplotype‐based association studies, the Newton‐Raphson (NR) and the Expectation‐Maximisation (EM) algorithms. In order to circumvent the limitations of both algorithms, including convergence to local minima and saddle points, we here described how a stochastic version of the EM algorithm, referred to as SEM, could be used for testing haplotype‐phenotype association. Statistical properties of the SEM algorithm were investigated through a simulation study for a large range of practical situations, including small/large samples and rare/frequent haplotypes, and results were compared to those obtained by use of the standard NR algorithm. Our simulation study indicated that the SEM algorithm provides results similar to those of the NR algorithm, making the SEM algorithm of great interest for haplotype‐based association analysis, especially when the number of polymorphisms is quite large.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple imputation after 18+ years
Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908 · Cited by 4,072
Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population.
(1995) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040269 · Cited by 1,950
Cited by
Li, Z., Zhang, Z., He, Z., Tang, W., Li, T., Zeng, Z., He, L., & Shi, Y. (2009) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2009.33 · Cited by 759
Borel, P., Lietz, G., Goncalves, A., Szabo de Edelenyi, F., Lecompte, S., Curtis, P., Goumidi, L., Caslake, M. J., Miles, E. A., Packard, C., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.112.172734 · Cited by 156
EADI consortium, G. C., Lambert, J.-C., Grenier-Boley, B., Harold, D., Zelenika, D., Chouraki, V, Kamatani, Y., Sleegers, K., Ikram, M. A., Hiltunen, M., et al. (2013) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2012.14 · Cited by 129
Self-citationQi, L., Liu, S., Rifai, N., Hunter, D., & Hu, F. B. (2007) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.05.006 · Cited by 67
Immonen, I., Seitsonen, S., Tommila, P., Kangas-Kontio, T., Kakko, S., Savolainen, E.-R., Savolainen, M. J., & Liinamaa, M. J. (2010) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.037 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Tregouet, D. A., Escolano, S., Tiret, L., Mallet, A., & Golmard, J. L.
- Venue
- Annals of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-09
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-177
- ISSN
- 0003-4800 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1809
- OpenAlex
- W2066608222
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new algorithm for haplotype‐based association analysis: the Stochastic‐EM algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.00085.x
- The paper
- Tregouet, D. A., Escolano, S., Tiret, L., Mallet, A., & Golmard, J. L. (2004). A new algorithm for haplotype‐based association analysis: the Stochastic‐EM algorithm. Annals of Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.00085.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.