The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Vulnerable Elders Survey: A Tool for Identifying Vulnerable Older People in the Community
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop a simple method for identifying community‐dwelling vulnerable older people, defined as persons age 65 and older at increased risk of death or functional decline. To assess whether self‐reported diagnoses and conditions add predictive ability to a function‐based survey. DESIGN: Analysis of longitudinal survey data. SETTING: A nationally representative community‐based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Six thousand two hundred five Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Bivariate and multivariate analyses of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey; development and comparison of scoring systems that use age, function, and self‐reported diagnoses to predict future death and functional decline. RESULTS: A multivariate model using function, self‐rated health, and age to predict death or functional decline was only slightly improved when self‐reported diagnoses and conditions were included as predictors and was significantly better than a model using age plus self‐reported diagnoses alone. These analyses provide the basis for a 13‐item function‐based scoring system that considers age, self‐rated health, limitation in physical function, and functional disabilities. A score of ≥3 targeted 32% of this nationally representative sample as vulnerable. This targeted group had 4.2 times the risk of death or functional decline over a 2‐year period compared with those with scores <3. The receiver operating characteristics curve had an area of .78. An alternative scoring system that included self‐reported diagnoses did not substantially improve predictive ability when compared with a function‐based scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: A function‐based targeting system effectively and efficiently identifies older people at risk of functional decline and death. Self‐reported diagnoses and conditions, when added to the system, do not enhance predictive ability. The function‐based targeting system relies on self‐report and is easily transported across care settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
Fried, L. P. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.8.585 · Cited by 1,107
Serum Albumin Level and Physical Disability as Predictors of Mortality in Older Persons
Corti, M.-C. (1994) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520130074036 · Cited by 672
Seeman, T. E., Charpentier, P. A., Berkman, L. F., Tinetti, M. E., Guralnik, J. M., Albert, M., Blazer, D., & Rowe, J. W. (1994) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/49.3.m97 · Cited by 522
Cited by
Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients:
Extermann, M., Aapro, M., Bernabei, R., Cohen, H. J., Droz, J.-P., Lichtman, S., Mor, V., Monfardini, S., Repetto, L., Sørbye, L., et al. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.06.003 · Cited by 1,098
Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J. M., Studenski, S., Fried, L. P., Cutler, G. B., Walston, J. D., & The Interventions on Frailty Working Group (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52174.x · Cited by 1,027
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Index for 4-Year Mortality in Older Adults
Lee, S. J. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.7.801 · Cited by 809
Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review
de Vries, N. M., Staal, J. B., van Ravensberg, C. D., Hobbelen, J. S. M., Olde Rikkert, M. G. M., & Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. (2011) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.001 · Cited by 793
Frailty in older adults: a nationally representative profile in the United States
Bandeen-Roche, K., Seplaki, C. L., Huang, J., Buta, B., Kalyani, R. R., Varadhan, R., Xue, Q.-L., Walston, J. D., & Kasper, J. D. (2015) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glv133 · Cited by 800
Metadata
- Authors
- Saliba, D., Elliott, M., Rubenstein, L. Z., Solomon, D. H., Young, R. T., Kamberg, C. J., Carol Roth, R., MacLean, C. H., Shekelle, P. G., Sloss, E. M., & Wenger, N. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1691-1699
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2107336306
- Cited by
- 1,073
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Vulnerable Elders Survey: A Tool for Identifying Vulnerable Older People in the Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49281.x
- The paper
- Saliba, D., Elliott, M., Rubenstein, L. Z., Solomon, D. H., Young, R. T., Kamberg, C. J., Carol Roth, R., MacLean, C. H., Shekelle, P. G., Sloss, E. M., & Wenger, N. S. (2001). The Vulnerable Elders Survey: A Tool for Identifying Vulnerable Older People in the Community. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49281.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.