Cited by 54Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Are Nursing Homes Appropriate for Older Adults with Severe Mental Illness? Conflicting Consumer and Clinician Views and Implications for the Olmstead Decision

Bartels, Stephen J., Miles, Keith M., Dums, Aricca R., Levine, Kristin J.·2003·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: In response to the recent Olmstead decision, to compare consumer and clinician perspectives on the appropriateness of nursing home settings for older adults with severe mental illness (SMI) in relation to clinical characteristics and care needs. Design: Cross‐sectional, descriptive, correlational study. Setting: Ten community mental health centers and two state‐funded nursing homes specializing in long‐term care for older persons with SMI. Participants: Consumers of mental health services in the community (n=115) and in nursing homes (n=106), aged 60 and older, with SMI. Sixty‐four clinicians (51% registered nurses, 29% masters‐level clinicians, and 20% certified social workers) conducted ratings. Measurements: Consumers and their clinicians were independently asked to determine the most appropriate care setting for each consumer based on care needs from three alternatives: nursing home, congregate (group) living setting, or individual apartment/home. Clinical characteristics of participants with SMI were rated using the Mini‐Mental State Examination, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Specific Level of Function Scale, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics, a modified memory and orientation subscale from the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, and an item from the Minimum Data Set related to reasoning. Results: Of nursing home residents with SMI who did not have severe cognitive impairment, 40% (n=42) and 51% (n=54) were considered by consumers or by their clinician, respectively, to be more appropriate for a community‐based setting, but there was a low level of agreement (only 27.6%; no better than chance) between consumers and clinicians on which nursing home residents were most appropriate for living in the community. Determinations by clinicians were associated with clinical need (diagnosis and less‐severe behavioral problems), whereas there was no association between clinical needs and level of care determinations by consumers. Finally, clinicians considered a group home necessary for 93.7% of nursing home residents judged to be more appropri‐ate for a community‐based setting, whereas 90.5% of con‐sumers stated that an apartment or individual home was indicated. Conclusion: State implementation of the Olmstead decision will need to consider major differences in perspectives between clinicians and consumers on the most appropriate long‐term care setting for older persons with SMI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51508.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartels, S. J., Miles, K. M., Dums, A. R., & Levine, K. J.
Affiliations
Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bartels, Stephen J.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-24
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
1571-1579
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1524117130
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K07MH001052)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
nursing homes, severe mental illness, older adults, long-term care, customer perspective, clinician perspectives, group homes, community-based care, cognitive impairment, behavioral problems
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Consumer Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Institutionalization, Male, Nursing Homes, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Assisted Living Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review