Cited by 38Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

A test of the inventory of attitudes towards seeking mental health services

Open access
Hyland, Philip, Boduszek, Daniel, Dhingra, Katie, Shevlin, Mark, Maguire, Rebecca, Morley, Kevin·2015·British Journal of Guidance & Counselling

Abstract

This study investigates the construct validity, composite reliability and concurrent validity of the Inventory of attitudes towards seeking mental health services (IASMHS). A large sample of Irish police officers (N = 331) participated in the study. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure of the scale, while composite reliability results demonstrated that the IASMHS possessed excellent internal reliability. Structural equation modelling indicated that help-seeking propensity was the strongest predictor of intentions to engage in psychological counselling followed by psychological openness. Neuroticism was a weak, significant predictor of intentions. Implications of these results are discussed in relation to improving utilisation rates of mental health services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03069885.2014.963510

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Raunic, A., & Xenos, S. (2008). University counseling services utilization by local and international students and user characteristics: A review. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 30, 262-267.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hyland, P., Boduszek, D., Dhingra, K., Shevlin, M., Maguire, R., & Morley, K.
Affiliations
  • National College of Ireland (IE)
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Dublin Business School (IE)
Corresponding author
Hyland, Philip
Venue
British Journal of Guidance & Counselling
Published
2014-10-13
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
397-412
ISSN
  • 0306-9885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3534
OpenAlex
W2007254302
Cited by
38
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Guidance and Counselling (publishedVersion)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • NORMA (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
  • Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (submittedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
help-seeking attitudes, mental health service utilization, police officers, open-mindedness, neuroticism, construct validity, scale development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review