Cited by 97Blood donation and transfusion practicesBlood transfusion and managementBlood groups and transfusion

Donation reactions among autologous donors

McVay, P.A., Andrews, A., Kaplan, E.B., Black, D.B., Stehling, L.C., Strauss, R.G., Toy, P.T.C.Y.·1990·Transfusion

Abstract

Studies of risk factors associated with reactions among autologous blood donors have been limited. Therefore, 2091 autologous and 4737 homologous donations were examined. Donors at greatest risk for reaction were autologous donors who had reactions at first donation; among 45 who made repeat donations for the same surgery, 17 (38%) had repeat reactions. The group least likely to experience reactions were the autologous donors ≥66 years old; they experienced a 1.9≥ percent (6/310) incidence of reactions. More reactions were seen in both autologous and homologous donors in the categories of first‐time donor, female gender, decreasing age, and lower weight. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that all of these variables were independent predictors of donor reaction, with first‐time donation (odds ratio, 2.4) and female gender (odds ratio, 1.9) being the strongest predictors of reaction. Donor room personnel should be alerted that autologous donors who react at first donation are very likely to react at subsequent donations. Contrary to common concern, elderly autologous donors are least likely to have reactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30390194347.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among female donors in various donation setups.

    “Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among the female donors in various donation setup (4,9,16,17,22,23, 24, 25, 26).”

    From ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS: SPECTRUM AND REMEDY (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McVay, P. A., Andrews, A., Kaplan, E. B., Black, D. B., Stehling, L. C., Strauss, R. G., & Toy, P. T. C. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • American Red Cross (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Toy, P.T.C.Y.
Venue
Transfusion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-03-04
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
249-252
ISSN
  • 0041-1132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2995
OpenAlex
W2083554346
Cited by
97
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
16.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transfusion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k07hl001426-02, 5k07hl001270-05, 5k07hl001257-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K07-HL01426, K07 HL01257, K07 HL01270)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood groups and transfusion
Keywords
autologous blood donation, donor reactions, risk factors, first-time donors, female donor, age, weight
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aging, Blood Donors, Blood Transfusion, Autologous, Blood Vessels, Female, Humans, Risk Factors, Vagus Nerve, Vascular Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review