Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitation of genomic DNA in plasma and serum samples: higher concentrations of genomic DNA found in serum than in plasma

Lee, Tzong‐Hae, Montalvo, Leilani, Chrebtow, Vera, Busch, Michael P.·2001·Transfusion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plasma and serum samples have been used to detect cell‐free genomic DNA in serum or plasma in certain pathologic conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, pulmonary embolism, and malignancies, as well as in fetal cell chimerisms in maternal serum and/or plasma. In this study, baseline concentrations of cell‐free DNA in serum and plasma samples were evaluated for the study of posttransfusion chimerism. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: DNA was extracted from fresh or stored (4°C for 1‐6 days) normal donor serum or plasma samples (ACD; EDTA) by using reagents from an HIV assay kit. After incubation and washing of samples, purified DNA was amplified with HLA DQ‐α primers (GH26 and 27) or human Y‐chromosome primers (SA and SD) to quantitate the concentration of genomic DNA. RESULTS: Fresh serum samples had concentrations of cell‐free DNA that were about 20‐fold higher than the concentrations in fresh plasma samples. The concentration of cell‐free genomic DNA in serum samples increased daily, to a level more than 100 times baseline after clotted blood tubes were stored at 4°C for 4 to 5 days. There was a small increase in cell‐free plasma DNA in stored ACD whole blood samples. Male WBCs, spiked into fresh nonanticoagulated female blood, were lysed during the process of clotting, with male DNA liberated into the serum samples. CONCLUSION: Most cell‐free DNA in serum samples is generated during the process of clotting in the original collection tube. The concentration of cell‐free genomic DNA in fresh plasma is probably the same as that in circulation. Consequently, while serum samples should not be used to monitor the concentration of cell‐free DNA in a patient's circulation, serum collected from sample tubes containing clots (i.e., without anticoagulant), 3 to 5 days after the date of phlebotomy, could be useful as a source of DNA with which to screen for posttransfusion microchimerism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41020276.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Lee, T., Montalvo, L., Chrebtow, V., & Busch, M. P.
Venue
Transfusion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-02
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
276-282
ISSN
  • 0041-1132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2995
OpenAlex
W2009026548
Cited by
311
References
2
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitation of genomic DNA in plasma and serum samples: higher concentrations of genomic DNA found in serum than in plasma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41020276.x
The paper
Lee, T., Montalvo, L., Chrebtow, V., & Busch, M. P. (2001). Quantitation of genomic DNA in plasma and serum samples: higher concentrations of genomic DNA found in serum than in plasma. Transfusion. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41020276.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.