Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship Between QRS Duration and Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients with End‐Stage Heart Failure

BLEEKER, GABE B., SCHALIJ, MARTIN J., MOLHOEK, SANDER G., VERWEY, HARRIETTE F., HOLMAN, EDUARD R., BOERSMA, ERIC, STEENDIJK, PAUL, VAN DER WALL, ERNST E., BAX, JEROEN J.·2004·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with end‐stage heart failure and a wide QRS complex are considered candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, 20% to 30% of patients do not respond to CRT. Lack of left ventricular dyssynchrony may explain the nonresponse. Accordingly, we evaluated the presence of left ventricular dyssynchrony using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in 90 consecutive patients with heart failure. Methods and Results: Ninety patients with severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, New York Heart Association class III–IV) were prospectively evaluated. Based on QRS duration, 30 consecutive patients with a narrow QRS complex were included (QRS duration ≤120 ms), 30 patients with an intermediate QRS duration (120–150 ms), and 30 patients with a wide QRS complex (>150 ms). All patients underwent TDI to assess left ventricular dyssynchrony. Extensive left ventricular dyssynchrony was defined as an electromechanical delay on TDI between the septum and lateral wall, the so‐called septal‐to‐lateral delay, of >60 ms. Severe dyssynchrony was observed in 27% of patients with narrow QRS complex, 60% with intermediate QRS duration, and 70% with wide QRS complex. No relation existed between QRS duration and septal‐to‐lateral delay. Conclusion: From 30% to 40% of heart failure patients with QRS duration >120 ms do not exhibit left ventricular dyssynchrony, which may explain the nonresponse to CRT. Alternatively, 27% of patients with heart failure and a narrow QRS complex show significant left ventricular dyssynchrony and may be candidates for CRT. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 15, pp. 544‐549, May 2004)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03604.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
BLEEKER, G. B., SCHALIJ, M. J., MOLHOEK, S. G., VERWEY, H. F., HOLMAN, E. R., BOERSMA, E., STEENDIJK, P., VAN DER WALL, E. E., & BAX, J. J.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04-30
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
544-549
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W1989053350
Cited by
425
References
1
FWCI
24.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship Between QRS Duration and Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients with End‐Stage Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03604.x
The paper
BLEEKER, G. B., SCHALIJ, M. J., MOLHOEK, S. G., VERWEY, H. F., HOLMAN, E. R., BOERSMA, E., STEENDIJK, P., VAN DER WALL, E. E., & BAX, J. J. (2004). Relationship Between QRS Duration and Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients with End‐Stage Heart Failure. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03604.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.