Cited by 119Gait Recognition and AnalysisBiometric Identification and SecurityHuman Pose and Action Recognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 215 of the 220 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robust gait recognition: a comprehensive survey

Open access
Rida, Imad, Almaadeed, Noor, Almaadeed, Somaya·2019·IET Biometrics

Abstract

Gait recognition has emerged as an attractive biometric technology for the identification of people by analysing the way they walk. However, one of the main challenges of the technology is to address the effects of inherent various intra‐class variations caused by covariate factors such as clothing, carrying conditions, and view angle that adversely affect the recognition performance. The main aim of this survey is to provide a comprehensive overview of existing robust gait recognition methods. This is intended to provide researchers with state of the art approaches in order to help advance the research topic through an understanding of basic taxonomies, comparisons, and summaries of the state‐of‐the‐art performances on several widely used gait recognition datasets.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/iet-bmt.2018.5063

Cites

215 of 215 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 220 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bhowmik S., 2016, A literature survey on human identification by gait, Imperial J. Interdiscip Res., 2
  2. Kent J.T.: ‘New directions in shape analysis’ The Art Stat. Sci. 1992 pp.115–127
  3. Li X., 2013, ‘Gait recognition based on structural gait energy image’ J., Comput. Inf. Syst., 9, 121
  4. Liu Y. Zhang J. Wang C. et al. : ‘Multiple hog templates for gait recognition’.In: Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition 2012 Tsukuba Japan November2012 pp.2930–2933

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rida, I., Almaadeed, N., & Almaadeed, S.
Affiliations
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • Department of Computer Science and Engineering Qatar University Doha Qatar
Corresponding author
Rida, Imad
Venue
IET Biometrics
Published
2018-10-31
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
14-28
ISSN
2047-4938 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888394219
Cited by
119
References
220
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IET Biometrics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Qatar Foundation
  • Qatar National Research Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
gait recognition, biometric identification, intra-class variation, covariate effects, clothing variation, viewpoint variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review