The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Survey of automatic modulation classification techniques: classical approaches and new trends
Abstract
The automatic recognition of the modulation format of a detected signal, the intermediate step between signal detection and demodulation, is a major task of an intelligent receiver, with various civilian and military applications. Obviously, with no knowledge of the transmitted data and many unknown parameters at the receiver, such as the signal power, carrier frequency and phase offsets, timing information and so on, blind identification of the modulation is a difficult task. This becomes even more challenging in real-world scenarios with multipath fading, frequency-selective and time-varying channels. With this in mind, the authors provide a comprehensive survey of different modulation recognition techniques in a systematic way. A unified notation is used to bring in together, under the same umbrella, the vast amount of results and classifiers, developed for different modulations. The two general classes of automatic modulation identification algorithms are discussed in detail, which rely on the likelihood function and features of the received signal, respectively. The contributions of numerous articles are summarised in compact forms. This helps the reader to see the main characteristics of each technique. However, in many cases, the results reported in the literature have been obtained under different conditions. So, we have also simulated some major techniques under the same conditions, which allows a fair comparison among different methodologies. Furthermore, new problems that have appeared as a result of emerging wireless technologies are outlined. Finally, open problems and possible directions for future research are briefly discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deep Learning Models for Wireless Signal Classification With Distributed Low-Cost Spectrum Sensors
Rajendran, S., Meert, W., Giustiniano, D., Lenders, V., & Pollin, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2018.2835460 · Cited by 868
Modulation Classification Based on Signal Constellation Diagrams and Deep Learning
Peng, S., Jiang, H., Wang, H., Alwageed, H., Zhou, Y., Sebdani, M. M., & Yao, Y.-D. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2850703 · Cited by 632
Peng, S., Sun, S., & Yao, Y.-D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3085433 · Cited by 308
Automatic modulation classification using recurrent neural networks
Hong, D., Zhang, Z., & Xu, X. (2017) · 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/compcomm.2017.8322633 · Cited by 257
Reverse engineering and security evaluation of commercial tags for RFID-based IoT applications
Fernández-Caramés, T., Fraga-Lamas, P., Suárez-Albela, M., & Castedo, L. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17010028 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobre, O. A., Abdi, A., Bar-Ness, Y., & Su, W.
- Venue
- IET Communications
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-156
- ISSN
- 1751-8628 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8636
- OpenAlex
- W2005956500
- Cited by
- 1,393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survey of automatic modulation classification techniques: classical approaches and new trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1049/iet-com:20050176
- The paper
- Dobre, O. A., Abdi, A., Bar-Ness, Y., & Su, W. (2007). Survey of automatic modulation classification techniques: classical approaches and new trends. IET Communications. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com%3A20050176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.