The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic consensus of linear multi-agent systems
Abstract
This study concerns the consensus of a network of agents with general linear or linearised dynamics, whose communication topology contains a directed spanning tree. An observer-type consensus protocol based on the relative outputs of the neighbouring agents is adopted. The notion of consensus region is introduced, as a measure for the robustness of the protocol and as a basis for the protocol design. For neutrally stable agents, it is shown that there exists a protocol achieving consensus together with a consensus region that is the entire open right-half plane if and only if each agent is stabilisable and detectable. An algorithm is further presented for constructing such a protocol. For consensus with a prescribed convergence speed, a multi-step protocol design procedure is given, which yields an unbounded consensus region and at the same time maintains a favourable decoupling property. Finally, the consensus algorithms are extended to solve the formation control problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Cited by
Event-triggered communication and control of networked systems for multi-agent consensus
Nowzari, C., Garcia, E., & Cortés, J. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.03.009 · Cited by 655
Decentralized event-triggered consensus with general linear dynamics
Garcia, E., Cao, Y., & Casbeer, D. W. (2014) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.08.024 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Duan, Z., & Chen, G.
- Venue
- IET Control Theory & Applications
- Published
- 2011-01-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-28
- ISSN
- 1751-8644 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8652
- OpenAlex
- W2011113406
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic consensus of linear multi-agent systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0466
- The paper
- Li, Z., Duan, Z., & Chen, G. (2011). Dynamic consensus of linear multi-agent systems. IET Control Theory & Applications. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.