Cited by 8,339Distributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsOpinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceTraffic control and management

Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules

Open access
Jadbabaie, A., Jie Lin, Morse, A.S.·2003·IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Abstract

In a recent Physical Review Letters article, Vicsek et al. propose a simple but compelling discrete-time model of n autonomous agents (i.e., points or particles) all moving in the plane with the same speed but with different headings. Each agent's heading is updated using a local rule based on the average of its own heading plus the headings of its "neighbors." In their paper, Vicsek et al. provide simulation results which demonstrate that the nearest neighbor rule they are studying can cause all agents to eventually move in the same direction despite the absence of centralized coordination and despite the fact that each agent's set of nearest neighbors change with time as the system evolves. This paper provides a theoretical explanation for this observed behavior. In addition, convergence results are derived for several other similarly inspired models. The Vicsek model proves to be a graphic example of a switched linear system which is stable, but for which there does not exist a common quadratic Lyapunov function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tac.2003.812781

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. D. Grunbaum and A. Okubo, "Modeling social animal aggregations," in Frontiers in Theoretical Biology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994, 100 of Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, pp. 296-325.
  2. A. S. Morse, "Dwell-time switching," in Proc. 2nd Eur. Control Conf., 1993, pp. 176-181.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
2003-06
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
988-1001
ISSN
0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165744313
Cited by
8,339
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 114 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 244 · 2023: 281 · 2022: 265 · 2021: 288 · 2020: 336 · 2019: 364 · 2018: 429 · 2017: 501 · 2016: 500 · 2015: 554 · 2014: 640 · 2013: 556 · 2012: 571
FWCI
209.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
Vicsek model, collective coordination, nearest neighbor rule, multi-agent systems, convergence analysis, switched linear systems, common quadratic Lyapunov function, distributed coordination, flocking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review