Accurate range estimation for an electric vehicle including changing environmental conditions and traction system efficiency
Open accessAbstract
Range anxiety is an obstacle to the acceptance of electric vehicles (EVs), caused by drivers’ uncertainty regarding their vehicle's state of charge (SoC) and the energy required to reach their destination. Most estimation methods for these variables use simplified models with many assumptions that can result in significant error, particularly if dynamic and environmental conditions are not considered. For example, the combined efficiency of the inverter drive and electric motor varies throughout the route and is not constant as assumed in most range estimation methods. This study proposes an improved method for SoC and range estimation by taking into account location‐dependent environmental conditions and time‐varying drive system losses. To validate the method, an EV was driven along a selected route and the measured EV battery SoC at the destination was compared with that predicted by the algorithm. The results demonstrated excellent accuracy in the SoC and range estimation, which should help alleviate range anxiety.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simplified backward-looking models are considered sufficiently accurate for range evaluation and have advantages of higher flexibility, lower computational effort, and requiring knowledge of a smaller number of input data.
“At the same time, for range evaluation purposes, simplified backward looking models are considered sufficiently accurate, and have the advantages of higher flexibility, lower computational effort, and requiring the knowledge of a smaller number of input data [35].”
From Effect of Ambient Temperature on Electric Vehicles’ Energy Consumption and Range: Model Definition and Sensitivity Analysis Based on Nissan Leaf Data (2019) · cites this paper as [35]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 22 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Sarrafan, K., Sutanto, D., Muttaqi, K. M., & Town, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sarrafan, Kaveh
- Venue
- IET Electrical Systems in Transportation
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-124
- ISSN
- 2042-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2392639447
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- IET Electrical Systems in Transportation (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
- Keywords
- state of charge estimation, range anxiety, environmental factors, battery consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review