Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cell–cell interaction and diversity of emergent behaviours

Damiani, C., Serra, R., Villani, M., Kauffman, S.A., Colacci, A.·2011·IET Systems Biology
DOI 10.1049/iet-syb.2010.0039
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Despite myriads of possible gene expression profiles, cells tend to be found in a confined number of expression patterns. The dynamics of Boolean models of gene regulatory networks has proven to be a likely candidate for the description of such self-organisation phenomena. Because cells do not live in isolation, but they constantly shape their functions to adapt to signals from other cells, this raises the question of whether the cooperation among cells entails an expansion or a reduction of their possible steady states. Multi random Boolean networks are introduced here as a model for interaction among cells that might be suitable for the investigation of some generic properties regarding the influence of communication on the diversity of cell behaviours. In spite of its simplicity, the model exhibits a non-obvious phenomenon according to which a moderate exchange of products among adjacent cells fosters the variety of their possible behaviours, which on the other hand are more similar to one another. On the contrary, a more invasive coupling would lead cells towards homogeneity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/iet-syb.2010.0039

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Berks, 1991, 113, 131
  2. Bull, L., and Alonso-Sanz, R.: ‘On coupling random Boolean networks’’, Adamatzky, A., Alonso-Sanz, R., Lawniczak, A., Martinez, G.J., Morita, K., Worsch, T., Automata-2008: Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata, (Luniver Press 2008), p. 292–305
  3. Serra, 2008, Proc. Eighth Int. Conf. on Cellular Auotomata ACRI 2008, 315
  4. Kauffman, S.A.: ‘At home in the universe’, (Oxford University Press 1995)
  5. Serra, 2007, Proc. European Conf. on Complex Systems, ECCS07, paper 35
  6. Damiani, 2008, WIVACE 2008, 271
  7. Okamoto, 1997, 57, 141
  8. Yacoubi, 2006, Seventh Int. Conf. on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry

Cited by

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Damiani, C., Serra, R., Villani, M., Kauffman, S. A., & Colacci, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Social, Cognitive and Quantitative Sciences, Modena and Reggio Emilia University, via Allegri 9, Reggio Emilia, I-42100, Italia
  • Complex Systems Centre, University of Vermont, 200C Farrell Hall, 210 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
  • Excellence Environmental Carcinogenesis, Environmental Protection and Health Prevention Agency, Emilia-Romagna, viale Filopanti 22, Bologna, Italia
Venue
IET Systems Biology
Publisher
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
Published
2011-03-11
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
137-144
ISSN
  • 1751-8849
  • 1751-8857
DOI
10.1049/iet-syb.2010.0039
Cited by
38
References
25
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.