The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What accuracy statistics really measure
Open accessAbstract
The paper aims to provide the software estimation research community with a better understanding of the meaning of, and relationship between, two statistics that are often used to assess the accuracy of predictive models: the mean magnitude relative error, MMRE, and the number of predictions within 25% of the actuals, pred(25). It is demonstrated that MMRE and pred(25) are, respectively, measures of the spread and the kurtosis of the variable z where z=estimate/actual. Thus, z is considered to be a measure of accuracy, and statistics such as MMRE and pred(25) to be measures of properties of the distribution of z. It is suggested that measures of the central location and skewness of z, as well as measures of spread and kurtosis, are necessary. Furthermore, since the distribution of z is non-normal, non-parametric measures of these properties may be needed. For this reason, boxplots of z are useful alternatives to simple summary metrics. It is also noted that the simple residuals are better behaved than the z variable, and could also be used as the basis for comparing prediction systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Botchkarev, A. (2019) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management · doi:10.28945/4184 · Cited by 616
How Long Will It Take to Fix This Bug?
Weiss, C., Premraj, R., Zimmermann, T., & Zeller, A. (2007) · Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR'07:ICSE Workshops 2007) · doi:10.1109/msr.2007.13 · Cited by 375
Data mining techniques for software effort estimation: a comparative study
Dejaeger, K., Verbeke, W., Martens, D., & Baesens, B. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2011.55 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Kitchenham, B. A., Pickard, L. M., MacDonell, S. G., & Shepperd, M. J.
- Venue
- IEE Proceedings - Software
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 81
- ISSN
- 1462-5970 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125791732
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What accuracy statistics really measure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1049/ip-sen:20010506
- The paper
- Kitchenham, B. A., Pickard, L. M., MacDonell, S. G., & Shepperd, M. J. (2001). What accuracy statistics really measure. IEE Proceedings - Software. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-sen%3A20010506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.