The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Typology Design of Performance Metrics to Measure Errors in Machine Learning Regression Algorithms
Open accessAbstract
Aim/Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze various performance metrics and approaches to their classification. The main goal of the study was to develop a new typology that will help to advance knowledge of metrics and facilitate their use in machine learning regression algorithms Background: Performance metrics (error measures) are vital components of the evaluation frameworks in various fields. A performance metric can be defined as a logical and mathematical construct designed to measure how close are the actual results from what has been expected or predicted. A vast variety of performance metrics have been described in academic literature. The most commonly mentioned metrics in research studies are Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), etc. Knowledge about metrics properties needs to be systematized to simplify the design and use of the metrics. Methodology: A qualitative study was conducted to achieve the objectives of identifying related peer-reviewed research studies, literature reviews, critical thinking and inductive reasoning. Contribution: The main contribution of this paper is in ordering knowledge of performance metrics and enhancing understanding of their structure and properties by proposing a new typology, generic primary metrics mathematical formula and a visualization chart Findings: Based on the analysis of the structure of numerous performance metrics, we proposed a framework of metrics which includes four (4) categories: primary metrics, extended metrics, composite metrics, and hybrid sets of metrics. The paper identified three (3) key components (dimensions) that determine the structure and properties of primary metrics: method of determining point distance, method of normalization, method of aggregation of point distances over a data set. For each component, implementation options have been identified. The suggested new typology has been shown to cover a total of over 40 commonly used primary metrics Recommendations for Practitioners: Presented findings can be used to facilitate teaching performance metrics to university students and expedite metrics selection and implementation processes for practitioners Recommendation for Researchers: By using the proposed typology, researchers can streamline development of new metrics with predetermined properties Impact on Society: The outcomes of this study could be used for improving evaluation results in machine learning regression, forecasting and prognostics with direct or indirect positive impacts on innovation and productivity in a societal sense Future Research: Future research is needed to examine the properties of the extended metrics, composite metrics, and hybrid sets of metrics. Empirical study of the metrics is needed using R Studio or Azure Machine Learning Studio, to find associations between the properties of primary metrics and their “numerical” behavior in a wide spectrum of data characteristics and business or research requirements
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R. (2014) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 · Cited by 7,178 · cited 4×
“Chai and Draxler (2014) clarified that “as every statistical measure condenses a large number of data into a single value, it only provides one projection of the model errors emphasizing a certain aspect of the error characteristics of the model performance.””
BackgroundInfluentialWillmott, C., & Matsuura, K. (2005) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr030079 · Cited by 6,512 · cited 3×
“Suggested in this paper generic formula for primary performance metrics is more comprehensive than used by Willmott & Matsuura (2005), as their definition can be applied only to metrics with mean-averaging type of error aggregation.”
BackgroundMethodAnother look at measures of forecast accuracy
Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 · Cited by 5,757
Analysis of Ecological Communities
Anderson, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0981(03)00091-1 · Cited by 5,086
Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models
Willmott, C. J., Ackleson, S. G., Davis, R. E., Feddema, J. J., Klink, K. M., Legates, D. R., O'Donnell, J., & Rowe, C. M. (1985) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/jc090ic05p08995 · Cited by 2,026
Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions
Cha, S.-H. (2007) · Cited by 1,644
25 years of time series forecasting
De Gooijer, J. G., & Hyndman, R. J. (2006) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.01.001 · Cited by 1,587
Statistical and machine learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward
Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194889 · Cited by 1,528
Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: Empirical comparisons
Armstrong, J. S., & Collopy, F. (1992) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(92)90008-w · Cited by 1,396
Cited by
Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., & Jurman, G. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.623 · Cited by 5,380
A Deep Learning Framework for Optimization of MISO Downlink Beamforming
Xia, W., Zheng, G., Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, J., & Petropulu, A. P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2019.2960361 · Cited by 345
“On the contrary, the MSE loss function is highly sensitive to outliers in the dataset because the MSE function tries to adjust the model according to these outlier values, at the expense of other samples [50].”
BackgroundTapeh, A. T. G., & Naser, M. Z. (2023) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09793-w · Cited by 320
Desai, F., Chowdhury, D., Kaur, R., Peeters, M., Arya, R. C., Wander, G. S., Gill, S. S., & Buyya, R. (2022) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2021.100485 · Cited by 97
Wells, B. J., Nguyen, H. M., McWilliams, A., Pallini, M., Bovi, A., Kuzma, A., Kramer, J., Chou, S.-H., Hetherington, T., Corn, P., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01900-y · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Botchkarev, A.
- Venue
- Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management
- Publisher
- Informing Science Institute
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 045-076
- ISSN
- 1555-1229 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-1237
- OpenAlex
- W3105640742
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 59.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Typology Design of Performance Metrics to Measure Errors in Machine Learning Regression Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.28945/4184
- The paper
- Botchkarev, A. (2019). A New Typology Design of Performance Metrics to Measure Errors in Machine Learning Regression Algorithms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management. https://doi.org/10.28945/4184
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.