Cited by 28Traffic Prediction and Management TechniquesTransportation Planning and OptimizationUrban Transport Systems Analysis

A two‐stage method for bus passenger load prediction using automatic passenger counting data

Open access
Wang, Pengfei, Chen, Xuewu, Chen, Jingxu, Hua, Mingzhuang, Pu, Ziyuan·2021·IET Intelligent Transport Systems

Abstract

In high‐frequency transit, providing real‐time crowding information (RTCI) is a potential way to promote passenger satisfaction and reduce negative crowding externalities, by assisting passengers in choosing less crowded vehicles. To make RTCI convincing and reliable, it is necessary to provide predictive RTCI, in which bus passenger load (BPL) prediction is the primary problem. This paper proposes a novel two‐stage BPL prediction method using automatic passenger counting (APC) data. The first stage is to predict short‐term passenger flows at stops based on an adaptive Kalman filter approach. Using the outputs from the first stage as well as other variables directly from APC data, the second stage is to predict BPL based on a support vector regression algorithm. Several methods from the existing literature are used as benchmarks to test the relative performance of the proposed method. An empirical study on bus line 1 in Suzhou, China shows that the proposed method outperforms all the benchmarks, and shows significant superiority over other methods for stops with sharp increases in BPL and for multi‐step ahead prediction. This study contributes to the limited literature on BPL prediction and lays the foundation for providing accurate and reliable predictive RTCI in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/itr2.12018

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Addressing challenges through preprocessing techniques, comprehensive training datasets, adherence to data privacy regulations, and strategic system design will be crucial for successful deployment and operation of these systems in public transport.

    “Addressing these challenges through preprocessing techniques [102], comprehensive training datasets [103], adherence to data privacy regulations [104], and strategic system design will be crucial for the successful deployment and operation of these systems in public transport.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, P., Chen, X., Chen, J., Hua, M., & Pu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Monash University Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Chen, Xuewu
Venue
IET Intelligent Transport Systems
Published
2021-01-07
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
248-260
ISSN
  • 1751-956X (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-9578
OpenAlex
W3119724063
Cited by
28
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IET Intelligent Transport Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2018YFB1601300)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71901059)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Urban Transport Systems Analysis
Keywords
automatic passenger counting, adaptive Kalman filter, support vector regression, two-stage prediction, multi-step forecasting, passenger demand forecasting, bus stops

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review