Cited by 913Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchHistory and Developments in Astronomy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

No planet for HD 166435

Open access
Queloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J. P., Baliunas, S. L., Beuzit, J. L., Donahue, R. A., Mayor, M., Naef, D., Perrier, C., Udry, S.·2001·Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

The G0 V star HD 166435 has been observed by the fiber-fed spectrograph ELODIE as one of the targets in the large extra-solar planet survey that we are conducting at the Observatory of Haute-Provence. We detected coherent, low-amplitude, radial-velocity variations with a period of 3.7987 days, suggesting a possible close-in planetary companion. Subsequently, we initiated a series of high-precision photometric observations to search for possible planetary transits and an additional series of Ca II H and K observations to measure the level of surface magnetic activity and to look for possible rotational modulation. Surprisingly, we found the star to be photometrically variable and magnetically active. A detailed study of the phase stability of the radial-velocity signal revealed that the radial-velocity variability remains coherent only for durations of about 30 days. Analysis of the time variation of the spectroscopic line profiles using line bisectors revealed a correlation between radial velocity and line-bisector orientation. All of these observations, along with a one-quarter cycle phase shift between the photometric and the radial-velocity variations, are well explained by the presence of dark photospheric spots on HD 166435. We conclude that the radial-velocity variations are not due to gravitational interaction with an orbiting planet but, instead, originate from line-profile changes stemming from star spots on the surface of the star. The quasi-coherence of the radial-velocity signal over more than two years, which allowed a fair fit with a binary model, makes the stability of this star unusual among other active stars. It suggests a stable magnetic field orientation where spots are always generated at about the same location on the surface of the star.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361:20011308

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bisector slope and FWHM of the cross-correlation function provide good diagnostics for stellar activity.

    “Other parameters such as the span of the bisector slope and the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the cross-correlation function were measured as well. They provide good diagnostics for stellar activity (e.g. Queloz et al. 2001; Huélamo et al. 2008).”

    From Mass and period limits on the ringed companion transiting the young star J1407 (2015) · cites this paper as Queloz et al. 2001

    Section 2.2 (p. 4) defines the CCF bisector span as a measure of bisector slope and finds that it tracks radial velocity, providing evidence that the variation originates in the stellar atmosphere. The cited paper does not establish the FWHM of the CCF as an activity diagnostic; searches for FWHM and cross-correlation-function width found no such discussion. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Protostars and Planets VI

    Mannings, V., Boss, A., & Russell, S. (2000) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6299 · Cited by 3,354 · cited 2×

    “…we began a campaign of highprecision photometric observations with an automatic photoelectric telescope (APT) at Fairborn Observatory in Arizona to search for planetary transits and made tentative plans to announce the new planet at the Protostars and Planets IV conference (Mannings et al. 2000).”
    BackgroundMethod
  • Lecture Notes in Physics

    Ehlers, J., Hepp, K., Kippenhahn, M. R., WeidenmiJller, H. A., Zittartz, J., & Droz, M. (2001) · doi:10.1016/0030-3992(80)90094-8 · Cited by 2,242 · cited 1×

    “This phenomena is observed on the Sun to a lesser degree where leader spots tend to be larger and to live longer than follower spots, resulting in a displacement up to 5 0 between the photocenters of the spot and the associated plages (Dobson-Hockey & Radick 1986).”
    Background
  • Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun

    Baliunas, S. L., & Hartmann, L. W. (1984) · Lecture notes in physics · doi:10.1007/3-540-12907-3 · Cited by 524 · cited 1×

    “From 1998 June to 1998 August, 141 Ca II H and K measurements were made on 20 nights with the 100-inch telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory as part of the HK Project (Baliunas et al. 1998).”
    MethodSelf-citation
  • New Developments in Array Technology and Applications

    Philip, A. G. D., Janes, K., & Upgren, A. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0383-1 · Cited by 57 · cited 5×

    “In addition to the stellar radial velocity, the cross-correlation function (CCF) provides additional information about features in the averaged spectral lines (see Queloz 1994 for a review).”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential
  • A Solar Observatory

    Strach, E. (1996) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0999-0_24 · Cited by 1

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 7 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mannings, V., Boss, A. P., & Russell, S. S. 2000, Protostars and Planets IV (Tucson: University of Arizona Press)
  2. Queloz, D., Mayor, M., Sivan, et al. 1998, in 'Brown Dwrafs and Extrasolar Planets', ASP Conf. Ser., vol. 134 , ed. R. Rebolo, E. L. Martin, M. R. Zapatero Osorio, 324.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Queloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J. P., Baliunas, S. L., Beuzit, J. L., Donahue, R. A., Mayor, M., Naef, D., Perrier, C., & Udry, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Tennessee State University (US)
  • Observatoire de Haute-Provence (FR)
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
Venue
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2001-11
Volume
379
Issue
1
Pages
279-287
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0756
OpenAlex
W2116181668
Cited by
913
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 48
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9706268)
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (HRD-9706268, NCC596)
  • Carnegie Institution of Washington
  • Richard Lounsbery Foundation
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
radial velocity variations, stellar activity, stellar spots, line bisectors, photometric variability, stellar magnetic activity, Ca II H and K lines, phase stability, binary star models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review