Cited by 914Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchHistory and Developments in Astronomy

Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets

Open access
Butler, R. P., Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Vogt, S. S., Tinney, C. G., Jones, H. R. A., Carter, B. D. +3 more·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present a catalog of nearby exoplanets. It contains the 172 known low-mass companions with orbits established through radial velocity and transit measurements around stars within 200 pc. We include five previously unpublished exoplanets orbiting the stars HD 11964, HD 66428, HD 99109, HD 107148, and HD 164922. We update orbits for 83 additional exoplanets, including many whose orbits have not been revised since their announcement, and include radial velocity time series from the Lick, Keck, and Anglo-Australian Observatory planet searches. Both these new and previously published velocities are more precise here due to improvements in our data reduction pipeline, which we applied to archival spectra. We present a brief summary of the global properties of the known exoplanets, including their distributions of orbital semimajor axis, minimum mass, and orbital eccentricity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/504701

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jupiter-mass and Neptune-mass exoplanets have been found closer to their host than Mercury is to the Sun.

    “However, Jupiter-mass and Neptune-mass exoplanets have been found closer to their host than Mercury is to the Sun (Butler et al., 2006; Borucki et al., 2010), so planetary migration through the disk has been suggested to explain how these hot giant planets moved from their birth locations to their current locations (see below).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Butler et al., 2006

Cites

  • Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star

    Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312457 · Cited by 1,415 · see citing works

  • No planet for HD 166435

    Queloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J. P., Baliunas, S. L., Beuzit, J. L., Donahue, R. A., Mayor, M., Naef, D., Perrier, C., & Udry, S. (2001) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011308 · Cited by 913 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…stars are bright enough to permit precise photometric and chromospheric monitoring by telescopes of modest size, permitting careful assessment of velocity jitter, starspots, and possible transits, e.g., Henry (1999); Henry et al. (2000); Queloz et al. (2001); Eaton, Henry, & Fekel (2003).”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butler, R. P., Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Vogt, S. S., Tinney, C. G., Jones, H. R. A., Carter, B. D., Johnson, J. A., McCarthy, C., & Penny, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Australian Astronomical Observatory (AU)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • University of Southern Queensland (AU)
  • Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (GB)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-07-20
Volume
646
Issue
1
Pages
505-522
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2109435540
Cited by
914
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 64
FWCI
59.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
low-mass companions, radial velocity, transit, exoplanet catalog, orbital elements, orbital eccentricity, minimum mass, radial velocity time series, data reduction pipeline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review