CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchHistory and Developments in Astronomy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The planet search programme at the ESO CES and HARPS: IV. The search for Jupiter analogues around solar-like stars

Open access
Zechmeister, M., Kürster, M., Endl, M., Lo Curto, G., Hartman, H., Nilsson, H., Henning, T., Hatzes, A. P., Cochran, W. D.·2013·Astronomy & Astrophysics
DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/201116551
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Context. In 1992 we began a precision radial velocity survey for planets around solar-like stars with the Coudé Echelle Spectrograph and the Long Camera (CES LC) at the 1.4 m telescope in La Silla (Chile) resulting in the discovery of the planet ι Hor b. We have continued the survey with the upgraded CES Very Long Camera (VLC) and the HARPS spectrographs, both at the 3.6 m telescope, until 2007.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201116551

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Super-Earths are more common than giant planets: ∼40% of stars have at least one super-Earth within a fifty day orbital period, whereas only ∼10% of stars have giant planets at any orbital period.

    “Super-Earths are more common than giant planets. ∼ 40% of stars have at least one super-Earth within a fifty day orbital period (Howard et al. 2010), whereas only ∼ 10% of stars have giant planets at any orbital period (e.g., Cumming et al. 2008, Zechmeister et al. 2013).”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Zechmeister et al. 2013

    The Abstract estimates a roughly 10% frequency of giant planets around solar-like stars, but limits it to orbital periods shorter than 10 years. The Summary and conclusion (p. 22) likewise cites survey estimates with period limits. The source therefore supports the approximate frequency, not the claim that it applies at any orbital period; the 40% super-Earth figure is attributed to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • No planet for HD 166435

    Queloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J. P., Baliunas, S. L., Beuzit, J. L., Donahue, R. A., Mayor, M., Naef, D., Perrier, C., & Udry, S. (2001) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011308 · Cited by 913 · cited 1×

    “To test this, one can analyse theR′HK-index and the shape of the cross-correlation function (CCF) function in particular its full width at half maximum (FWHM) and bisector span (BIS, Queloz et al. 2001) which are measures for the averaged stellar line width and asymmetry, respectively.”
    Method

  • An Earth-mass planet orbiting α Centauri B

    Dumusque, X., Pepe, F., Lovis, C., Ségransan, D., Sahlmann, J., Benz, W., Bouchy, F., Mayor, M., Queloz, D., Santos, N., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11572 · Cited by 404 · cited 3×

    “The trend seen in logR′HK is part of a longer magnetic cycle which be seen more clearly when adding recently published HARPS data by Dumusque et al. (2012).”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 96

  1. Anglada-Escudé, 2012, ApJS, 200, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/15 · DOI
  2. Baize, 1989, A&AS, 77, 497
  3. Baluev, 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2052, 10.1093/mnras/sts476 · DOI
  4. Benedict, 2006, AJ, 132, 2206, 10.1086/508323 · DOI
  5. Boisse, 2011, A&A, 528, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014354 · DOI
  6. Boisse, 2012, A&A, 545, A55, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118419 · DOI
  7. Bouchy, 2001, A&A, 374, 733, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010730 · DOI
  8. Bouchy, 2009, A&A, 505, 853, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912427 · DOI
  9. Bouchy, F., Isambert, J., Lovis, C., et al. 2009b, in EAS Pub. Ser., 37, ed. P. Kern, 247 · DOI
  10. Buccino, 2008, A&A, 483, 903, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078925 · DOI
  11. Burgasser, 2000, ApJ, 531, L57, 10.1086/312522 · DOI
  12. Butler, 1996, PASP, 108, 500, 10.1086/133755 · DOI
  13. Butler, 2001, ApJ, 555, 410, 10.1086/321467 · DOI
  14. Butler, 2006, ApJ, 646, 505, 10.1086/504701 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Connes, 1985, Ap&SS, 110, 211, 10.1007/BF00653671 · DOI
  16. Cox, 2000, S&T, 100, 72
  17. Cumming, 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1165, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08275.x · DOI
  18. Cumming, 2008, PASP, 120, 531, 10.1086/588487 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Deakin, 1999, The Australian Surveyor, 44, 74, 10.1080/00050351.1999.10558776 · DOI
  20. del Peloso, 2000, A&A, 358, 233
  21. Donahue, 1996, ApJ, 466, 384, 10.1086/177517 · DOI
  22. Drake, 1993, ApJ, 412, 797, 10.1086/172962 · DOI
  23. Dravins, 1998, A&A, 330, 1077
  24. Dumusque, X., Lovis, C., Udry, S., & Santos, N. C. 2011a, in IAU Symp., 276, eds. A. Sozzetti, M. G. Lattanzi, & A. P. Boss, 530 · DOI
  25. Dumusque, 2011, A&A, 525, A140, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014097 · DOI
  26. Eggenberger, 2007, A&A, 474, 273, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077447 · DOI
  27. Eiroa, 2010, A&A, 518, L131, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014594 · DOI
  28. Enard, D. 1982, in Presented at the SPIE Conf., 331, 232 · DOI
  29. Endl, 2000, A&A, 362, 585
  30. Endl, 2002, A&A, 392, 671, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020937 · DOI
  31. Favata, 1997, A&A, 323, 809
  32. Fröhlich, 2007, Astron. Nachr., 328, 1037, 10.1002/asna.200710876 · DOI
  33. Geißler, 2007, A&A, 461, 665, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065843 · DOI
  34. da Silva, 2012, A&A, 541, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118598 · DOI
  35. Hatzes, 2000, ApJ, 544, L145, 10.1086/317319 · DOI
  36. Heintz, 1978, ApJS, 37, 515, 10.1086/190540 · DOI
  37. Horne, 1986, PASP, 98, 609, 10.1086/131801 · DOI
  38. Isaacson, 2010, ApJ, 725, 875, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/875 · DOI
  39. Janson, 2007, AJ, 133, 2442, 10.1086/516632 · DOI
  40. Janson, 2008, A&A, 488, 771, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809984 · DOI
  41. Janson, 2009, MNRAS, 399, 377, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15285.x · DOI
  42. Jefferys, 1988, Celestial Mechanics, 41, 39, 10.1007/BF01238750 · DOI
  43. Jones, H. R. A., Butler, R. P., Tinney, C. G., et al. 2004, in Extrasolar Planets: Today and Tomorrow, eds. J. Beaulieu, A. Lecavelier Des Etangs, & C. Terquem, ASP Conf. Ser., 321, 298
  44. Kaper, 1966, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 18, 465
  45. King, 2010, A&A, 510, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912981 · DOI
  46. Kjeldsen, 1995, A&A, 293, 87
  47. Kürster, 2000, A&A, 353, L33
  48. Kürster, 2003, A&A, 403, 1077, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030396 · DOI
  49. Lineweaver, 2003, ApJ, 598, 1350, 10.1086/379124 · DOI
  50. Liseau, 2010, A&A, 518, L132, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014601 · DOI
  51. Lovis, 2006, Nature, 441, 305, 10.1038/nature04828 · DOI
  52. Lovis, C., Dumusque, X., Santos, N. C., et al. 2011, A&A, submitted [arXiv:1107.5325] · arXiv
  53. Marcy, 2008, Phys. Scr. T, 130, 014001, 10.1088/0031-8949/2008/T130/014001 · DOI
  54. Mason, 2001, AJ, 122, 3466, 10.1086/323920 · DOI
  55. Mayor, 1995, Nature, 378, 355, 10.1038/378355a0 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Mayor, 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20
  57. Mayor, M., Marmier, M., Lovis, C., et al. 2011, A&A, submitted [arXiv:1109.2497] · arXiv
  58. Metcalfe, 2010, ApJ, 723, L213, 10.1088/2041-8205/723/2/L213 · DOI
  59. Mordasini, 2012, A&A, 541, A97, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117350 · DOI
  60. Naef, 2001, A&A, 375, 205, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010841 · DOI
  61. Naef, 2003, A&A, 410, 1051, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031341 · DOI
  62. Naef, D., Mayor, M., Beuzit, J., et al. 2005, in 13th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, eds. F. Favata, G. A. J. Hussain, & B. Battrick, ESA SP, 560, 833
  63. Naef, 2010, A&A, 523, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913616 · DOI
  64. O’Toole, 2009, ApJ, 701, 1732, 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1732 · DOI
  65. Pepe, 2004, A&A, 423, 385, 10.1051/0004-6361:20040389 · DOI
  66. Pepe, 2011, A&A, 534, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117055 · DOI
  67. Perryman, 1997, A&A, 323, L49
  68. Pourbaix, 2002, A&A, 386, 280, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020287 · DOI
  69. Poveda, 1994, Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis., 28, 43
  70. Quillen, 2002, ApJ, 578, L149, 10.1086/344708 · DOI
  71. Reffert, 2011, A&A, 527, A140, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015861 · DOI
  72. Reidemeister, 2011, A&A, 527, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015328 · DOI
  73. Rivera, 2010, ApJ, 708, 1492, 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1492 · DOI
  74. Santos, 2004, A&A, 415, 1153, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034469 · DOI
  75. Santos, 2010, A&A, 511, A54, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913433 · DOI
  76. Schlesinger, 1917, AJ, 30, 137, 10.1086/104203 · DOI
  77. Scholz, 2003, A&A, 398, L29, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021847 · DOI
  78. Ségransan, 2010, A&A, 511, A45, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912136 · DOI
  79. Shporer, 2010, ApJ, 722, 880, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/880 · DOI
  80. Sousa, 2008, A&A, 487, 373, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809698 · DOI
  81. Standish, 1990, A&A, 233, 252
  82. Teixeira, 2009, A&A, 494, 237, 10.1051/0004-6361:200810746 · DOI
  83. Tinney, 2011, ApJ, 727, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/103 · DOI
  84. Unsöld, A., & Baschek, B. (eds.) 2002, in Der neue Kosmos (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) · DOI
  85. van Leeuwen, 2007, A&A, 474, 653, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078357 · DOI
  86. Vauclair, 2008, A&A, 482, L5, 10.1051/0004-6361:20079342 · DOI
  87. Vogt, 2005, ApJ, 632, 638, 10.1086/432901 · DOI
  88. Vogt, 2010, ApJ, 708, 1366, 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1366 · DOI
  89. Walker, 1995, Icarus, 116, 359, 10.1006/icar.1995.1130 · DOI
  90. Wittenmyer, 2006, AJ, 132, 177, 10.1086/504942 · DOI
  91. Wittenmyer, 2011, ApJ, 727, 102, 10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/102 · DOI
  92. Worley, 1997, A&AS, 125, 523, 10.1051/aas:1997239 · DOI
  93. Wright, 2004, ApjS, 152, 261, 10.1086/386283 · DOI
  94. Wright, 2008, ApJ, 683, L63, 10.1086/587461 · DOI
  95. Zechmeister, 2009, A&A, 496, 577, 10.1051/0004-6361:200811296 · DOI
  96. Zechmeister, 2009, A&A, 505, 859, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912479 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zechmeister, M., Kürster, M., Endl, M., Lo Curto, G., Hartman, H., Nilsson, H., Henning, T., Hatzes, A. P., & Cochran, W. D.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
  • McDonald Observatory (US)
  • Malmö University (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2013-04
Volume
552
Pages
A78
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/201116551
OpenAlex
W4298470318
Cited by
77
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
exoplanet detection, radial velocity, HARPS spectrograph, solar-type stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review