Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CALIFA: a diameter-selected sample for an integral field spectroscopy galaxy survey

Open access
Walcher, C. J., Wisotzki, L., Bekeraité, S., Husemann, B., Iglesias-Páramo, J., Backsmann, N., Barrera Ballesteros, J., Catalán-Torrecilla, C., Cortijo, C., del Olmo, A., Garcia Lorenzo, B., Falcón-Barroso, J., Jilkova, L., Kalinova, V., Mast, D., Marino, R. A., Méndez-Abreu, J., Pasquali, A., Sánchez, S. F., Trager, S., Zibetti, S., Aguerri, J. A. L., Alves, J., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Boselli, A., Castillo Morales, A., Cid Fernandes, R., Flores, H., Galbany, L., Gallazzi, A., García-Benito, R., Gil de Paz, A., González-Delgado, R. M., Jahnke, K., Jungwiert, B., Kehrig, C., Lyubenova, M., Márquez Perez, I., Masegosa, J., Monreal Ibero, A., Pérez, E., Quirrenbach, A., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Roth, M. M., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., Spekkens, K., Tundo, E., van de Ven, G., Verheijen, M. A. W., Vilchez, J. V., Ziegler, B.·2014·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

We describe and discuss the selection procedure and statistical properties of the galaxy sample used by the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area (CALIFA) survey, a public legacy survey of 600 galaxies using integral field spectroscopy. The CALIFA “mother sample” was selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR7 photometric catalogue to include all galaxies with an r-band isophotal major axis between 45′′ and 79.2′′ and with a redshift 0.005 < z < 0.03. The mother sample contains 939 objects, 600 of which will be observed in the course of the CALIFA survey. The selection of targets for observations is based solely on visibility and thus keeps the statistical properties of the mother sample. By comparison with a large set of SDSS galaxies, we find that the CALIFA sample is representative of galaxies over a luminosity range of −19 > Mr > −23.1 and over a stellar mass range between 109.7 and 1011.4 M⊙. In particular, within these ranges, the diameter selection does not lead to any significant bias against – or in favour of – intrinsically large or small galaxies. Only below luminosities of Mr = −19 (or stellar masses <109.7 M⊙) is there a prevalence of galaxies with larger isophotal sizes, especially of nearly edge-on late-type galaxies, but such galaxies form <10% of the full sample. We estimate volume-corrected distribution functions in luminosities and sizes and show that these are statistically fully compatible with estimates from the full SDSS when accounting for large-scale structure. For full characterization of the sample, we also present a number of value-added quantities determined for the galaxies in the CALIFA sample. These include consistent multi-band photometry based on growth curve analyses; stellar masses; distances and quantities derived from these; morphological classifications; and an overview of available multi-wavelength photometric measurements. We also explore different ways of characterizing the environments of CALIFA galaxies, finding that the sample covers environmental conditions from the field to genuine clusters. We finally consider the expected incidence of active galactic nuclei among CALIFA galaxies given the existing pre-CALIFA data, finding that the final observed CALIFA sample will contain approximately 30 Sey2 galaxies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201424198

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Walcher, C. J., Wisotzki, L., Bekeraité, S., Husemann, B., Iglesias-Páramo, J., Backsmann, N., Barrera Ballesteros, J., Catalán-Torrecilla, C., Cortijo, C., del Olmo, A., Garcia Lorenzo, B., Falcón-Barroso, J., Jilkova, L., Kalinova, V., Mast, D., Marino, R. A., Méndez-Abreu, J., Pasquali, A., Sánchez, S. F., Trager, S., Zibetti, S., Aguerri, J. A. L., Alves, J., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Boselli, A., Castillo Morales, A., Cid Fernandes, R., Flores, H., Galbany, L., Gallazzi, A., García-Benito, R., Gil de Paz, A., González-Delgado, R. M., Jahnke, K., Jungwiert, B., Kehrig, C., Lyubenova, M., Márquez Perez, I., Masegosa, J., Monreal Ibero, A., Pérez, E., Quirrenbach, A., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Roth, M. M., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., Spekkens, K., Tundo, E., van de Ven, G., Verheijen, M. A. W., Vilchez, J. V., & Ziegler, B.
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2014-09
Volume
569
Pages
A1
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W1997129189
Cited by
252
References
1
FWCI
15.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CALIFA: a diameter-selected sample for an integral field spectroscopy galaxy survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361/201424198
The paper
Walcher, C. J., Wisotzki, L., Bekeraité, S., Husemann, B., Iglesias-Páramo, J., Backsmann, N., Barrera Ballesteros, J., Catalán-Torrecilla, C., Cortijo, C., del Olmo, A., Garcia Lorenzo, B., Falcón-Barroso, J., Jilkova, L., Kalinova, V., Mast, D., Marino, R. A., Méndez-Abreu, J., Pasquali, A., Sánchez, S. F., . . . Ziegler, B. (2014). CALIFA: a diameter-selected sample for an integral field spectroscopy galaxy survey. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424198

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.