Cited by 96Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Towards universal hybrid star formation rate estimators

Open access
Boquien, M., Kennicutt, R., Calzetti, D., Dale, D., Galametz, M., Sauvage, M., Croxall, K., Draine, B. +8 more·2016·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

Context. To compute the star formation rate (SFR) of galaxies from the rest-frame ultraviolet (UV), it is essential to take the obscuration by dust into account. To do so, one of the most popular methods consists in combining the UV with the emission from the dust itself in the infrared (IR). Yet, different studies have derived different estimators, showing that no such hybrid estimator is truly universal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201527759

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • ESTIMATING THE STAR FORMATION RATE AT 1 kpc SCALES IN NEARBY GALAXIES

    Leroy, A. K., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G., Boissier, S., Bolatto, A., Brinks, E., Madore, B., Munoz-Mateos, J.-C., Murphy, E., Sandstrom, K., et al. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/3 · Cited by 203 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “This can be achieved for instance by directly processing the images or by estimating the level of the diffuse emission from an ancillary dataset (e.g., from a gas map, assuming the gas–to–dust mass ratio and the radiation field intensity due to old stars, Leroy et al. 2012).”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boquien, M., Kennicutt, R., Calzetti, D., Dale, D., Galametz, M., Sauvage, M., Croxall, K., Draine, B., Kirkpatrick, A., Kumari, N., Hunt, L., De Looze, I., Pellegrini, E., Relaño, M., Smith, J.-D., & Tabatabaei, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Antofagasta (CL)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Wyoming (US)
  • European Southern Observatory (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory (IT)
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (ES)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
591
Pages
A6
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2314305972
Cited by
96
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS5‐98034)
  • California Institute of Technology (NAS5-98034)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (AYA2013-41243-P)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/N000927/1, ST/M001334/1)
  • Fondo de Innovación para la Competitividad
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
star formation rate, dust attenuation, infrared emission, dust continuum emission, galaxies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review