Cited by 41Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Satellite Systems and Control

Orbital clustering of distant Kuiper belt objects by hypothetical Planet 9. Secular or resonant?

Open access
Beust, H.·2016·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

Context. Statistical analysis of the orbits of distant Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) has led to the suggestion that an additional planet should reside in the solar system. According to recent models, the secular action of this body should cause orbital alignment of the KBOs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201628638

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of Planet Nine are mainly secular, so the mean anomaly of Planet Nine does not affect the outcome.

    “As the effects of Planet Nine are now understood to be mainly secular (Beust 2016), the position of Planet Nine within its orbit (the mean anomaly, M 9 ) does not affect the outcome, so it is unused.”

    From The Orbit of Planet Nine (2021) · cites this paper as Beust 2016

    Section 2 and Appendix A show that the non-resonant secular model averages over Planet Nine’s mean anomaly, so its orbital position does not enter that model. But Section 4 says it is difficult to determine whether secular or resonant dynamics dominates, and Section 3 explains that resonant dynamics cannot be averaged over both orbits independently. The paper therefore does not support treating Planet Nine’s mean anomaly as irrelevant to the outcome generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]9. Malhotra, M., Volk, K., & Wang, X. 2016, ArXiv e-print [arXiv:1603.02196v2] · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beust, H.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Beust, H.
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2016-05-12
Volume
590
Pages
L2
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2366893103
Cited by
41
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
Planet Nine, orbital clustering, orbital alignment, secular perturbations, orbital resonance, undiscovered planet, solar system dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review