Cited by 28Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

Cosmologists in search of planet nine: The case for CMB experiments

Open access
Cowan, Nicolas B., Holder, Gil, Kaib, Nathan A.·2016·The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract

Cosmology experiments at millimeter wavelengths can detect Planet Nine if it is the size of Neptune, has an effective temperature of 40 K, and is 700 au from the Sun. It would appear as a ∼30 mJy source at 1 mm with an annual parallax of ∼5 arcmin. The challenge is to distinguish it from the approximately 4000 foreground asteroids brighter than 30 mJy. Fortunately, these asteroids are known to the Minor Planet Center and can be identified because they move across a resolution element in a matter of hours, orders of magnitude faster than Planet Nine. If Planet Nine is smaller, colder, and/or more distant than expected, then it could be as faint as 1 mJy at 1 mm. There are roughly 10 6 asteroids this bright and many are unknown, making current cosmology experiments confusion limited for moving sources. Nonetheless, it may still be possible to find the proverbial needle in the haystack using a matched filter. This would require millimeter telescopes with high angular resolution and high sensitivity in order to alleviate confusion and to enable the identification of moving sources with relatively short time baselines. Regardless of its millimeter flux density, searching for Planet Nine would require frequent radio measurements for large swaths of the sky, including the ecliptic and Galactic plane. Even if Planet Nine had already been detected by other means, measuring its millimeter flux would constrain its internal energy budget, and therefore help resolve the mystery of Uranus and Neptune, which have vastly different internal heat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/l2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current cosmological experiments at millimeter wavelengths have sufficient sensitivity to detect Planet Nine, but a systematic search would require millimeter telescopes with both high sensitivity and high angular resolution to robustly detect moving sources.

    “While current cosmological experiments at millimeter wavelengths have su cient sensitivity to detect Planet Nine (Cowan et al., 2016), a systematic search would require millimeter telescopes with both high sensitivity and high angular resolution to robustly detect moving sources.”

    From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Cowan et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cowan, N. B., Holder, G., & Kaib, N. A.
Affiliations
  • Trottier Space Institute at McGill (CA)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Cowan, Nicolas B.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2016-04-22
Volume
822
Issue
1
Pages
L2
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2275900960
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
Planet Nine, matched filter, annual parallax, trans-Neptunian objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review