CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Planck 2018 results

Alves, Joao, Forveille, Thierry, Pentericci, Laura, Shore, Steve·2020·Astronomy & Astrophysics
DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/202039265
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Planck 2018 resultsIn this volume, we proudly present a special feature on the results from the ESA Planck mission, based on data released by ESA and the Planck Collaboration in July 2018.This 2018 data release has significantly lower systematic residuals for both Planck instruments, LFI and HFI, and a more accurate photometric calibration for HFI.These calibration improvements are most significant over the largest angular scales and for the polarized emission.The resulting frequency maps were used to separate the diffuse sky emission into maps of the cosmic microwave background, the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, the cosmic infrared background, and the Galactic thermal dust, carbon monoxide, anomalous dust, free-free, and synchrotron emission.The 12 articles in the special issue describe the released data products and present scientific results extracted by the Planck Collaboration from this data.The six-parameter ΛCDM model continues to provide an excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift.Planck measures five of those six parameters to better than 1%, and together with external datasets, sets tight limits to many possible extensions of the model.Beyond those immediate results, the Planck 2018 dataset constitutes an essential treasure trove and will have lasting importance for both cosmology and foreground astrophysics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/202039265

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Planck lensing reconstruction power spectrum is consistent with the expected amplitude for the ΛCDM model that fits the CMB temperature and polarization power spectra, i.e., compatible with A_lens=1.

    “the Planck lensing measurement is compatible with A lens = 1 [80]”

    From Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Alves, J., Forveille, T., Pentericci, L., & Shore, S.
ORCID
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2020-09
Volume
641
Pages
E1
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/202039265
OpenAlex
W3148237350
Cited by
264
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.edpsciences.org/en/authors/copyright-and-licensing (vor, 10 d)
Locations
Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
cosmic microwave background, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, CMB polarization, thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, cosmic infrared background, synchrotron radiation, free-free emission, carbon monoxide emissions, foreground separation, photometric calibration, cosmological parameters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review