Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clusters in the inner spiral arms of M 51: The cluster IMF and the formation history

Open access
Bik, A., Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Bastian, N., Panagia, N., Romaniello, M.·2003·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

We present the results of an analysis of the HST–WFPC2 observations of the interacting galaxy M 51. From the observations in 5 broadband filters (UBVRI) and two narrowband filters (Hα and [OIII]) we study the cluster population in a region of 3.2 kpc2 in the inner spiral arms of M 51, at a distance of about 1 to 3 kpc from the nucleus. We found 877 cluster candidates and we derived their ages, initial masses and extinctions by means of a comparison between the observed spectral energy distribution and the predictions from cluster synthesis models for instantaneous star formation and solar metallicity. The lack of [OIII] emission in even the youngest clusters with strong Hα emission, indicates the absence of the most massive stars and suggests a mass upper limit of about 25 to 30 . The mass versus age distribution of the clusters shows a drastic decrease in the number of clusters with age, much more severe than can be expected on the basis of evolutionary fading of the clusters. This indicates that cluster dispersion is occurring on a timescale of 10 Myr or longer. The cluster initial mass function has been derived from clusters younger than 10 Myr by a linear regression fit of the cumulative mass distribution. This results in an exponent in the range of but with an overabundance of clusters with . In the restricted range of we find . This exponent is very similar to the value derived for clusters in the interacting Antennae galaxies, and to the exponent of the mass distribution of the giant molecular clouds in our Galaxy. To study the possible effects of the interaction of M 51 with its companion NGC 5195 about 400 Myr ago, which triggered a huge starburst in the nucleus, we determined the cluster formation rate as a function of time for clusters with an initial mass larger than 104 . There is no evidence for a peak in the cluster formation rate at around 200 to 400 Myr ago within 2 σ accuracy, i.e. within a factor two. The formation rate of the detected clusters decreases strongly with age by about a factor 102 between 10 Myr and 1 Gyr. For clusters older than about 150 Myr this is due to the evolutionary fading of the clusters below the detection limit. For clusters younger than 100 Myr this is due to the dispersion of the clusters, unless one assumes that the cluster formation rate has been steadily increasing with time from 1 Gyr ago to the present time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361:20021384

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Bik, A., Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Bastian, N., Panagia, N., & Romaniello, M.
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2002-12-17
Volume
397
Issue
2
Pages
473-486
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2138111676
Cited by
186
References
2
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clusters in the inner spiral arms of M 51: The cluster IMF and the formation history. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361:20021384
The paper
Bik, A., Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Bastian, N., Panagia, N., & Romaniello, M. (2003). Clusters in the inner spiral arms of M 51: The cluster IMF and the formation history. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20021384

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.