Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The evolution of the Milky Way from its earliest phases: Constraints on stellar nucleosynthesis

Open access
François, P., Matteucci, F., Cayrel, R., Spite, M., Spite, F., Chiappini, C.·2004·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

We computed the evolution of the abundances of O, Mg, Si, Ca, K, Ti, Sc, Ni, Mn, Co, Fe and Zn in the Milky Way. We made use of the most widely adopted nucleosynthesis calculations and compared the model results with observational data with the aim of imposing constraints upon stellar yields. To best fit the data in the solar neighborhood, when adopting the Woosley & Weaver (1995, ApJS, 101, 181) yields for massive stars and the Iwamoto et al. ([CITE], ApJS, 125, 439) ones for type Ia SNe, it is required that: i) the Mg yields should be increased in stars with masses from 11 to 20 and decreased in masses larger than 20 . The Mg yield should be also increased in SNe Ia. ii) The Si yields should be slightly increased in stars above 40 , whereas those of Ti should be increased between 11 and 20 and above 30 . iii) The Cr and Mn yields should be increased in stars with masses in the range 11–20 ; iv) the Co yields in SNe Ia should be larger and smaller in stars in the range 11–20 ; v) the Ni yield from type Ia SNe should be decreased; vi) the Zn yield from type Ia SNe should be increased. vii) The yields of O (metallicity dependent SN models), Ca, Fe, Ni, and Zn (the solar abundance case) in massive stars from Woosley & Weaver ([CITE]) are the best to fit the abundance patterns of these elements since they do not need any changes. We also adopted the yields by Nomoto et al. ([CITE], Nucl. Phys. A, 621, 467) and Limongi & Chieffi ([CITE], ApJ, 592, 404) for massive stars and discuss the corrections required in these yields in order to fit the observations. Finally, the small spread in the [el/Fe] ratios in the metallicity range from [Fe/H] = -4.0 up to -3.0 dex (Cayrel et al. [CITE], A&A, 416, 1117) is a clear sign that the halo of the Milky Way was well mixed even in the earliest phases of its evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361:20034140

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
François, P., Matteucci, F., Cayrel, R., Spite, M., Spite, F., & Chiappini, C.
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2004-06-22
Volume
421
Issue
2
Pages
613-621
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2114522326
Cited by
260
References
2
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of the Milky Way from its earliest phases: Constraints on stellar nucleosynthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361:20034140
The paper
François, P., Matteucci, F., Cayrel, R., Spite, M., Spite, F., & Chiappini, C. (2004). The evolution of the Milky Way from its earliest phases: Constraints on stellar nucleosynthesis. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20034140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.